flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Construction industry could be hurt by non-renewal of terrorism insurance bill

Despite broad support, measure stalled in Senate


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | January 8, 2015
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons
Photo: Abderitestatos via Wikimedia Commons

The construction industry and real estate development could be hampered by the U.S. Congress’s failure to renew the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA).

Insurance industry experts say without federal terrorism reinsurance in place for 2015, resulting canceled property/casualty insurance coverage and market chaos could be disruptive to the economy.

"A major terrorist attack occurring without a TRIA law on the books will be far more disruptive to the U.S. economy than one where TRIA is in place," saidInsurance Information Institute President Robert Hartwig. “Terrorism insurance policies are going to lapse in 2015, and insurers will be under no obligation to renew them, adversely impacting the construction, energy, and real estate industries, among others.”

Federal terrorism reinsurance had helped stabilize the market in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2011 terrorist attacks, and it had been renewed several times since. There was widespread bipartisan support for TRIA renewal, but retiring U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican, held up passage. Coburn objected to a measure included in the bill that would have set up the National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers, an entity that would have potentially bypassed state regulators.

One positive sign: A.M. Best said it “has determined that no rating actions on insurers previously identified as over-reliant upon [TRIA] are necessary at this time.” The rating agency said it reviewed action plans from insurance carriers addressing what they would do if TRIA was not renewed and concluded that “sufficient mitigation initiatives were developed to avoid a material impact on a rating unit’s financial strength.”

(http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2014/12/18/350561.htm)

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | May 7, 2015

Widespread damage from Nepal earthquake due to poor implementation of building code

Nepal’s code author says destruction was ‘inevitable.’

Codes and Standards | May 7, 2015

Lavish residential skyscrapers prompt concern over shadows

New York, San Francisco, Washington, D.C., and Boston among cities grappling with height regulations.

Codes and Standards | May 7, 2015

Several states moving to repeal prevailing wage laws

Anti-prevailing wage bills that apply to state-funded construction projects have been passed in West Virginia and Nevada. Similar laws could be passed in Indiana and Illinois.

Codes and Standards | May 7, 2015

New OSHA rule aimed at protecting construction workers in confined spaces

The agency says the rule will protect about 800 workers a year from serious injury.

Codes and Standards | May 1, 2015

Colorado House kills construction defects bill

The legislation would have made it harder for condo owners to sue builders.

Codes and Standards | May 1, 2015

New energy efficiency program, Tenant Star, gets OK from Congress

The voluntary program for commercial and government buildings is modeled after Energy Star.

Smart Buildings | May 1, 2015

FEMA to require states to evaluate risks posed by climate change

The aim is for states to do a better job planning for natural disasters they are likely to face in a warming world.

Codes and Standards | May 1, 2015

Department of Energy asks for feedback on cost-effectiveness of building energy codes

DOE’s RFI wants input on how to improve methodology on cost assessment.

Codes and Standards | Apr 22, 2015

New York State renews design-build authority

Five state agencies are allowed to use design-build on certain projects.

Codes and Standards | Apr 22, 2015

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. 

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021