flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

COURTHOUSE GIANTS: A ranking of the nation's top courthouse design and construction firms

COURTHOUSE GIANTS: A ranking of the nation's top courthouse design and construction firms

DLR Group, NBBJ, Hensel Phelps, Sundt Construction, AECOM, and Dewberry top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest courthouse sector AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.


By BD+C Staff | September 1, 2016

Pixabay Public Domain

TOP 20 COURTHOUSE ARCHITECTURE FIRMS
Rank Firm 2015 Revenue
1 DLR Group $10,100,000
2 NBBJ $6,000,000
3 Moseley Architects $5,487,385
4 HOK $4,857,000
5 EYP $4,383,235
6 Skidmore, Owings & Merrill $4,073,500
7 Heery International $3,965,047
8 LPA $3,819,537
9 JLG Architects $3,030,963
10 NORR $2,846,179
11 HMC Architects $2,706,683
12 Gensler $2,700,000
13 Environetics $2,525,040
14 ZGF Architects $2,021,406
15 Beyer Blinder Belle Architects & Planners $2,019,874
16 Gresham, Smith and Partners $1,497,000
17 EwingCole $1,314,000
18 Wold Architects and Engineers $1,300,000
19 HDR $1,259,200
20 Stantec $1,045,461
21 CO Architects $854,000
22 CTA Architects Engineers $549,694
     
     
TOP 20 COURTHOUSE CONSTRUCTION FIRMS
Rank Firm 2015 Revenue
1 Hensel Phelps $275,220,000
2 Sundt Construction $206,025,749
3 Turner Construction Co. $171,604,876
4 Clark Group $154,006,050
5 JE Dunn Construction $102,632,438
6 Walsh Group, The $83,936,815
7 PCL Construction Enterprises $66,345,923
8 KBE Building Corp. $33,152,583
9 Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., The $27,745,624
10 Gilbane Building Co. $17,146,000
11 Lendlease $15,598,000
12 Layton Construction Co. $13,200,000
13 Yates Companies, The $8,200,000
14 Kitchell Corp. $6,690,253
15 Skanska USA $6,336,097
16 Manhattan Construction Group $5,987,000
17 Hill International $4,000,000
18 Fortis Construction $2,487,890
19 Cumming $1,540,500
20 WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff $1,474,000
21 Suffolk Construction Co. $1,386,332
22 Zak Companies $483,916
23 Alberici-Flintco $431,359
     
     
TOP 20 COURTHOUSE ENGINEERING FIRMS
Rank Firm 2015 Revenue
1 AECOM $30,000,000
2 Dewberry $8,066,646
3 Jacobs $6,800,000
4 Loring Consulting Engineers $5,000,000
5 WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff $4,353,000
6 KJWW / TTG $1,551,237
7 Spectrum Engineers $1,475,505
8 Woolpert $981,307
9 Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates $780,000
10 Newcomb & Boyd $764,895
11 JBA Consulting Engineers $667,816
12 Jensen Hughes $666,716
13 Magnusson Klemencic Associates $375,179
14 TLC Engineering for Architecture $358,742
15 Mazzetti $350,563
16 Peter Basso Associates $333,424
17 P2S Engineering $310,951
18 Glumac $244,860
19 Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers $209,662
20 ME Engineers $200,000

 

RETURN TO THE GIANTS 300 LANDING PAGE

Related Stories

| Apr 12, 2011

American Institute of Architects announces Guide for Sustainable Projects

AIA Guide for Sustainable Projects to provide design and construction industries with roadmap for working on sustainable projects.

| Apr 11, 2011

Wind turbines to generate power for new UNT football stadium

The University of North Texas has received a $2 million grant from the State Energy Conservation Office to install three wind turbines that will feed the electrical grid and provide power to UNT’s new football stadium. 

| Apr 8, 2011

SHW Group appoints Marjorie K. Simmons as CEO

Chairman of the Board Marjorie K. Simmons assumes CEO position, making SHW Group the only firm in the AIA Large Firm Roundtable to appoint a woman to this leadership position

| Apr 5, 2011

Zaha Hadid’s civic center design divides California city

Architect Zaha Hadid  is in high demand these days, designing projects in Hong Kong, Milan, and Seoul, not to mention the London Aquatics Center, the swimming arena for the 2012 Olympics. But one of the firm’s smaller clients, the city of Elk Grove, Calif., recently conjured far different kinds of aquatic life when members of the City Council and the public chose words like “squid,” “octopus,” and “starfish” to describe the latest renderings for a proposed civic center.

| Apr 5, 2011

Are architects falling behind on BIM?

A study by the National Building Specification arm of RIBA Enterprises showed that 43% of architects and others in the industry had still not heard of BIM, let alone started using it. It also found that of the 13% of respondents who were using BIM only a third thought they would be using it for most of their projects in a year’s time.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Urban Planning

Bridging the gap: How early architect involvement can revolutionize a city’s capital improvement plans

Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs) typically span three to five years and outline future city projects and their costs. While they set the stage, the design and construction of these projects often extend beyond the CIP window, leading to a disconnect between the initial budget and evolving project scope. This can result in financial shortfalls, forcing cities to cut back on critical project features.



Libraries

Reasons to reinvent the Midcentury academic library

DLR Group's Interior Design Leader Gretchen Holy, Assoc. IIDA, shares the idea that a designer's responsibility to embrace a library’s history, respect its past, and create an environment that will serve student populations for the next 100 years.

halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021