The built environment has a profound impact on our natural environment, economy, health, and productivity, according to the US Green Building Council (USGBC). In the United States alone, buildings account for:
* 65% of electricity consumption
* 36% of energy use
* 40% of greenhouse gas emissions
* 30% of raw materials use
* 30% of waste output (136 million tons annually)
* 12% of potable water consumption
When you think about these statistics, it’s no wonder that a movement toward sustainability has been underway for the past 16 years. LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design), first introduced in 2000, is an ecology-oriented building certification program run under the auspices of the USGBC. LEED concentrates its efforts on improving performance across five key areas of environmental and human health: energy efficiency, indoor environmental quality, materials selection, sustainable site development and water savings.
The LEED rating is the globally accepted benchmark for the design, construction, and operation of high-performance green buildings. LEED certification provides independent, third-party verification that a building project is environmentally responsible and a healthy place to live and work.
Early adopters in the healthcare sector struggled with adapting LEED standards to the special needs of healthcare operations with limited success. Recognizing this, in 2009 the USGBC launched LEED for Healthcare, codifying in the LEED structure principles from the Green Guide for Healthcare. In 2011, LEED for Healthcare was updated and rebranded as LEED BD+C: Healthcare. This designation seeks to align the points of emphasis from the traditional LEED framework to the realities of the healthcare environment. For example, many of LEED’s Indoor Environmental Quality requirements were modified to reflect the need for infection prevention, as well as the existing code requirements for ventilation in healthcare facilities. Since its launch, over 40 different projects worldwide have met LEED criteria to be certified by the USGBC under LEED for Healthcare.
The pursuit of LEED can come with a price tag, in some cases adding a 1% to 3% premium to the overall construction budget. With tight budget constraints placed on healthcare executives, paying the additional premium to be “green” and achieving the project’s financial goals can be seen as mutually exclusive. However, when considering the triple bottom line—Pocketbook, People, and Planet—going green can be a responsible decision.
Pocketbook
Energy costs represent a large portion of healthcare expenditures. Recognizing this, over one fifth of the available LEED points are tied to energy performance gains. At a minimum, LEED requires a 10% improvement in building performance rating over the baseline case. Initially, achieving these credits can be costly. However, a payback in energy savings can be realized down the road. For example, high-efficiency chillers can cost 20% more than comparable standard units, but installing these more efficient units can result in up to a 42% reduction in the energy required for space cooling and a potential 48% savings in cooling tower use.
In addition, process water used to operate building systems such as boilers, chillers, cooling towers, and sterilizers comprises 75% of the water used at hospitals. Even modest improvements in process water efficiency (e.g. using condensate for cooling tower makeup water) can save institutions thousands of gallons of water annually.
Lighting upgrades, coupled with smart controls and increased natural lighting, can decrease electrical usage while creating an environment more conducive to healing. Recent advances in LED lighting technology have in many instances made the first cost of these fixtures equal to or less expensive than fluorescent or incandescent options.
People
Increasing connections to the natural environment and available natural light are important components of the LEED framework. A growing body of research shows positive correlation between maximizing natural light and reduced lengths of stay. Prudent owners are requesting that their designers go well beyond the code minimum requirements for clear views in order to take advantage of this correlation.
Giving patients control over their environment has been linked with better patient outcomes and higher patient satisfaction scores. Dimmable lighting systems, operable window shades, and in-room thermostats allow the in-room environment to be tailored to the particular needs of each patient. Coupled with a robust building automation system, these control points can also be used to reduce energy consumption by avoiding unnecessarily lighting or heating unoccupied spaces.
Building green can also increase staff satisfaction. Recent studies have shown a link between LEED facilities, staff comfort, and satisfaction levels. For example, a 2014 study in the Journal of Hospital Administration showed higher levels of staff engagement at the LEED Platinum Dell Children’s Hospital in Austin, Texas, compared to two other non-LEED hospitals. In addition, staff turnover decreased after moving from Dell’s predecessor into the new LEED facility.
Better indoor air quality-that is, the control of both internally generated and external pollutants-will also have a positive impact on the well-being of building occupants. Careful selection of building materials, along with proper ventilation, operation, and maintenance can improve indoor air quality. Improvements in the indoor environment of our healthcare facilities can have a profound impact on sensitive populations such as children, the elderly, and patients who are immunocompromised or have respiratory problems.
Planet
In 2009, researchers estimated that greenhouse gas emissions related to healthcare activities represented 8% of the total in the United States. More recent research has shown that the healthcare sector’s carbon footprint is growing, increasing by more than 30% over the past 10 years.
Greening both the built environment and the supply chain provides hospitals the opportunity to live up to their obligation to “first, do no harm.” By making environmentally conscious choices in the design and construction of their facilities, organizations can reduce their impact to the planet. As noted above, reduction in energy and water usage will show up on financial statements, but in considering the decision to go green administrators should weigh such non-financial measures as:
* waste diverted from landfills
* reduction in water drawn from aquifers
* reduction in wastewater discharged to local waterways
* reduction in carbon emissions from power plants, boilers, and generators
* access to green transit options, which lower the environmental impacts of staff and patient commuting
* use of sustainable building materials and products
Conclusion
As we approach the end of the second decade of LEED, the financial costs and benefits of going green are well documented. In many cases, due to increased demand for environmentally friendly products, the cost of implementing certain green strategies is negligible. However, there are still areas where green choices do not pass a purely financial test.
Fortunately, healthcare systems are not purely in the business of generating financial returns. Healthcare organizations must also care for people they encounter—patients, staff, and visitors—and the world around them. Considering the triple bottom line, pocketbook, people, and planet, gives healthcare executives additional justification for using green building strategies to advance the organization’s mission.
Related Stories
| Jan 31, 2011
CISCA releases White Paper on Acoustics in Healthcare Environments
The Ceilings & Interior Systems Construction Association (CISCA) has released an extensive white paper “Acoustics in Healthcare Environments” for architects, interior designers, and other design professionals who work to improve healthcare settings for all users. This white paper serves as a comprehensive introduction to the acoustical issues commonly confronted on healthcare projects and howbest to address those.
| Jan 27, 2011
Perkins Eastman's report on senior housing signals a changing market
Top international design and architecture firm Perkins Eastman is pleased to announce that the Perkins Eastman Research Collaborative recently completed the “Design for Aging Review 10 Insights and Innovations: The State of Senior Housing” study for the American Institute of Architects (AIA). The results of the comprehensive study reflect the changing demands and emerging concepts that are re-shaping today’s senior living industry.
| Jan 21, 2011
Harlem facility combines social services with retail, office space
Harlem is one of the first neighborhoods in New York City to combine retail with assisted living. The six-story, 50,000-sf building provides assisted living for residents with disabilities and a nonprofit group offering services to minority groups, plus retail and office space.
| Jan 21, 2011
Research center built for interdisciplinary cooperation
The Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital, in Houston, the first basic research institute for childhood neurological diseases, is a 13-story twisting tower in the center of the hospital campus.
| Jan 19, 2011
Biomedical research center in Texas to foster scientific collaboration
The new Health and Biomedical Sciences Center at the University of Houston will facilitate interaction between scientists in a 167,000-sf, six-story research facility. The center will bring together researchers from many of the school’s departments to collaborate on interdisciplinary projects. The facility also will feature an ambulatory surgery center for the College of Optometry, the first of its kind for an optometry school. Boston-based firms Shepley Bulfinch and Bailey Architects designed the project.
| Jan 19, 2011
New Fort Hood hospital will replace aging medical center
The Army Corps of Engineers selected London-based Balfour Beatty and St. Louis-based McCarthy to provide design-build services for the Fort Hood Replacement Hospital in Texas, a $503 million, 944,000-sf complex partially funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The firm plans to use BIM for the project, which will include outpatient clinics, an ambulance garage, a central utility plant, and three parking structures. Texas firms HKS Architects and Wingler & Sharp will participate as design partners. The project seeks LEED Gold.
| Jan 10, 2011
Michael J. Alter, president of The Alter Group: ‘There’s a significant pent-up demand for projects’
Michael J. Alter, president of The Alter Group, a national corporate real estate development firm headquartered in Skokie, Ill., on the growth of urban centers, project financing, and what clients are saying about sustainability.
| Dec 17, 2010
ARRA-funded Navy hospital aims for LEED Gold
The team of Clark/McCarthy, HKS Architects, and Wingler & Sharp are collaborating on the design of a new naval hospital at Camp Pendleton in Southern California. The $451 million project is the largest so far awarded by the U.S. Navy under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The 500,000-sf, 67-bed hospital, to be located on a 70-acre site, will include facilities for emergency and primary care, specialty care clinics, surgery, and intensive care. The Building Team is targeting LEED Gold.
| Dec 17, 2010
Arizona outpatient cancer center to light a ‘lantern of hope’
Construction of the Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center in Gilbert, Ariz., is under way. Located on the Banner Gateway Medical Center campus near Phoenix, the three-story, 131,000-sf outpatient facility will house radiation oncology, outpatient imaging, multi-specialty clinics, infusion therapy, and various support services. Cannon Design incorporated a signature architectural feature called the “lantern of hope” for the $90 million facility.
| Oct 18, 2010
World’s first zero-carbon city on track in Abu Dhabi
Masdar City, the world’s only zero-carbon city, is on track to be built in Abu Dhabi, with completion expected as early as 2020. Foster + Partners developed the $22 billion city’s master plan, with Adrian Smith + Gordon Gill Architecture, Aedas, and Lava Architects designing buildings for the project’s first phase, which is on track to be ready for occupancy by 2015.
