Indoor waterparks are great. They allow for year-round use regardless of whether it is raining, snowing, or below freezing outside. But the main reason they exist is to allow people who live in climates that aren’t necessarily water park friendly the opportunity to join in on the fun. Given the option, wouldn’t the majority of us pick an outdoor water park to an indoor one?
It is that same line of thinking that has James Richards and his partner Ben Olschner, two Houston architects who previously worked at Herzog & de Meuron, questioning whether or not transforming the Astrodome into an indoor park and events center is really the best option. The preliminary plan for the Astrodome, as The Urban Edge blog reports, is to raise the floor and plop a 9-acre park on top, leaving the space beneath for parking or storage. With time, a conservatory could be developed that would fund a series of trails within the park.
The problem is, at least in the eyes of Richards, an indoor park is not that novel of an idea. Not only that, but the Houston area is ripe with beautiful outdoor parks and events space as it is, which begs the question, will people actually use the indoor park if it is created?
Richards doesn’t believe so. While Houston has very hot summers, the climate the rest of the year is relatively mild and perfect for outdoor activities. Richards also questions if such a large amount of plant life will even be able to thrive indoors and if restaurants and vendors would be financially viable based on the number of people who may visit the park regularly.
There are quite a few problems Richards has with the current plans. But, as is said, so easy to condemn, so hard to create. Only, Richards has taken the next step and created what he believes to be a better vision for what to do with the Astrodome.
Named “A-Dome park,” Richards, Olschner, and their partners’ proposal preserves the Astrodome while also highlighting and exposing the architectural elements that made it famous. The proposal would, for all intents and purposes, leave the Astrodome standing, while also providing open air events space beneath the dome.
Rendering courtesy of adomepark.org
How would they get the best of both worlds? By removing all non-structural surfaces on the interior and exterior of the Astrodome, leaving behind nothing but the steel skeleton, which would then be painted to prevent decay.
Additionally, the proposal calls for the removal of 1,800 parking spots (that would then be replaced by an underground parking structure), replacing them with a forest. Perhaps the most enticing part of the plan is a series of boardwalks that would circle around the dome all the way to the top of the structure, providing scenic views of the surrounding city for anyone who ventures all the way to the top. The space beneath the dome would still have electric access and could host a variety of events such as carnivals.
Besides the fact that it will most likely take more than a well-developed idea to get the county to complete change their plans on what to do with the Astrodome, there are a few other hurdles, as well.
First, the Texas Historical Commission would have to approve the plans to leave nothing but the Astrodome’s skeleton standing. Per state law, the Commission can reject any significant structural change to the building. There is also the question of finances. Richards says the project will cost $180 million, but funds can be raised via donations, money from private foundations, and endowments.
While getting the county to accept his new proposal may prove nearly impossible, Richards hopes his idea will at least show that other, more innovative options for what to do with the Astrodome exist.
Rendering courtesy of adomepark.org
Rendering courtesy of adomepark.org
To read the original story on The Urban Edge blog, click here.
To view the project’s website, including additional renderings and project details, click here.
Related Stories
| Jul 22, 2013
Convention Center Report [2013 Giants 300 Report]
Building Design+Construction's rankings of design and construction firms with the most revenue from convention center projects, as reported in the 2013 Giants 300 Report.
| Jul 22, 2013
Cultural Facility Report [2013 Giants 300 Report]
Building Design+Construction's rankings of design and construction firms with the most revenue from cultural facility projects, as reported in the 2013 Giants 300 Report.
| Jul 19, 2013
Reconstruction Sector Construction Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]
Structure Tone, DPR, Gilbane top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest reconstruction contractor and construction management firms in the U.S.
| Jul 19, 2013
Reconstruction Sector Architecture Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]
Stantec, HOK, HDR top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest reconstruction architecture and architecture/engineering firms in the U.S.
| Jul 19, 2013
Renovation, adaptive reuse stay strong, providing fertile ground for growth [2013 Giants 300 Report]
Increasingly, owners recognize that existing buildings represent a considerable resource in embodied energy, which can often be leveraged for lower front-end costs and a faster turnaround than new construction.
| Jul 18, 2013
Top Local Government Sector Construction Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]
Turner, Clark Group, PCL top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest local government sector contractor and construction management firms in the U.S.
| Jul 18, 2013
Top State Government Sector Engineering Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]
Jacobs, AECOM, URS top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest state government sector engineering and engineering/architecture firms in the U.S.
| Jul 18, 2013
Top State Government Sector Architecture Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]
Stantec, Perkins+Will, HNTB top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest state government sector architecture and architecture/engineering firms in the U.S.
| Jul 18, 2013
Top Federal Government Sector Construction Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]
Clark Group, PCL, Hensel Phelps top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest federal government sector contractor and construction management firms in the U.S.
| Jul 18, 2013
Top Federal Government Sector Engineering Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]
Fluor, URS, AECOM top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest federal government sector engineering and engineering/architecture firms in the U.S.