One Bryant Park, also known as the Bank of America Tower, in Manhattan faces an estimated $2.4 million in annual fines when New York City’s York’s Local Law 97 goes into effect.
The potential hefty levy on this property is ironic given that it was certified LEED Platinum after it opened in 2010. An in-depth article at Bloomberg.com about this predicament illustrates the complexities owners face in addressing the law, which imposes carbon caps that are backed up by fines for non-compliance.
Passed in 2019, the law is a sweeping measure establishing emissions limits for almost 50,000 of the city’s largest buildings. The owners of an estimated 20% of these office buildings, hotels, and multifamily properties will likely face fines in 2024 when the law goes into effect. Many more buildings would face fines in 2030, when the caps will be lowered by 40%.
Part of the issue for the Bank of America Tower is a density of employees with heavy computer usage—at least on some floors—that use a lot of electricity. The owner says Local Law 97 is deeply flawed because it doesn’t distinguish between different densities and usages of properties and points out that the terms of the lease with the bank preclude him from limiting their power usage.
The Bank of America Tower had some impressive green features when it was built: a natural gas-fueled cogeneration plant for electricity that uses heat from the combustion process for additional power to operate HVAC systems, a cooling system that uses ice made overnight when power demand is lower, and a green roof. Today, when the ultimate goal is carbon neutrality, though, these features do not create the desired impact.
The details of the law are still being worked out, though, and that may bode well for the owner. There is support from some city officials to make allowances for buildings such as the Bank of America Tower that time their energy use.
Related Stories
Codes and Standards | May 7, 2015
Widespread damage from Nepal earthquake due to poor implementation of building code
Nepal’s code author says destruction was ‘inevitable.’
Codes and Standards | May 7, 2015
Lavish residential skyscrapers prompt concern over shadows
New York, San Francisco, Washington, D.C., and Boston among cities grappling with height regulations.
Codes and Standards | May 7, 2015
Several states moving to repeal prevailing wage laws
Anti-prevailing wage bills that apply to state-funded construction projects have been passed in West Virginia and Nevada. Similar laws could be passed in Indiana and Illinois.
Codes and Standards | May 7, 2015
New OSHA rule aimed at protecting construction workers in confined spaces
The agency says the rule will protect about 800 workers a year from serious injury.
Codes and Standards | May 1, 2015
Colorado House kills construction defects bill
The legislation would have made it harder for condo owners to sue builders.
Codes and Standards | May 1, 2015
New energy efficiency program, Tenant Star, gets OK from Congress
The voluntary program for commercial and government buildings is modeled after Energy Star.
Smart Buildings | May 1, 2015
FEMA to require states to evaluate risks posed by climate change
The aim is for states to do a better job planning for natural disasters they are likely to face in a warming world.
Codes and Standards | May 1, 2015
Department of Energy asks for feedback on cost-effectiveness of building energy codes
DOE’s RFI wants input on how to improve methodology on cost assessment.
Codes and Standards | Apr 22, 2015
New York State renews design-build authority
Five state agencies are allowed to use design-build on certain projects.
Codes and Standards | Apr 22, 2015
OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually
The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach.
