Top Military Sector Architecture Firms
| Rank | Company | 2012 Military Revenue ($) |
| 1 | HDR Architecture | $63,546,903 |
| 2 | Heery International | $21,224,842 |
| 3 | HKS | $13,500,000 |
| 4 | HNTB Archtecture | $12,276,306 |
| 5 | Leo A Daly | $11,114,441 |
| 6 | RTKL Associates | $10,777,000 |
| 7 | Sherlock, Smith & Adams | $9,637,000 |
| 8 | VOA Associates | $8,354,050 |
| 9 | EwingCole | $8,000,000 |
| 10 | Corgan | $7,428,547 |
| 11 | Hoefer Wysocki Architecture | $7,221,000 |
| 12 | RSP Architects | $6,831,000 |
| 13 | Reynolds, Smith and Hills | $6,540,000 |
| 14 | HOK | $6,243,000 |
| 15 | EYP | $5,800,000 |
| 16 | LS3P | $5,065,979 |
| 17 | Hammel, Green and Abrahamson | $4,092,000 |
| 18 | Flad Architects | $3,484,000 |
| 19 | Emersion Design | $3,449,838 |
| 20 | KZF Design | $3,165,696 |
| 21 | RNL | $3,102,000 |
| 22 | Morris Architects | $2,900,000 |
| 23 | ZGF Architects | $2,654,318 |
| 24 | PGAL | $2,510,000 |
| 25 | Gensler | $2,500,000 |
| 26 | Skidmore, Owings & Merrill | $2,350,000 |
| 27 | IBI Group | $2,146,453 |
| 28 | Albert Kahn Family of Companies | $2,011,177 |
| 29 | CTA Architects Engineers | $1,762,047 |
| 30 | WHR Architects | $1,476,330 |
| 31 | SmithGroupJJR | $816,000 |
| 32 | Wight & Co. | $751,000 |
| 33 | OZ Architecture | $678,554 |
| 34 | Moseley Architects | $458,816 |
| 35 | Carrier Johnson + Culture | $367,935 |
| 36 | Harvard Jolly Architecture | $213,000 |
| 37 | Gresham, Smith and Partners | $180,318 |
| 38 | Fletcher-Thompson | $150,000 |
| 39 | SMMA | Symmes Maini & McKee Associates | $115,000 |
| 40 | Cooper Carry | $104,811 |
| 41 | TEG Architects - The Estopinal Group | $30,717 |
| 42 | WDG Architecture | $6,000 |
Top Military Sector Engineering Firms
| Rank | Company | 2012 Military Revenue ($) |
| 1 | Fluor | $2,063,244,000 |
| 2 | URS Corp. | $350,209,483 |
| 3 | AECOM Technology Corp. | $256,000,000 |
| 4 | Michael Baker Jr. | $70,890,000 |
| 5 | Science Applications International Corp. | $45,989,771 |
| 6 | Burns & McDonnell | $35,650,000 |
| 7 | Clark Nexsen | $27,896,498 |
| 8 | Allen & Shariff | $27,500,000 |
| 9 | Merrick & Co. | $20,000,000 |
| 10 | STV | $16,510,000 |
| 11 | Eaton Energy Solutions | $14,462,482 |
| 12 | Parsons Brinckerhoff | $12,293,193 |
| 13 | Guernsey | $9,746,352 |
| 14 | Barge, Waggoner, Sumner and Cannon | $9,000,000 |
| 15 | Affiliated Engineers | $4,112,000 |
| 16 | BRPH | $4,000,500 |
| 17 | KCI Technologies | $4,000,000 |
| 18 | Dewberry | $3,584,673 |
| 19 | Coffman Engineers | $3,025,000 |
| 20 | H&A Architects & Engineers | $2,998,476 |
| 21 | Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates | $2,860,000 |
| 22 | TLC Engineering for Architecture | $2,586,925 |
| 23 | RMF Engineering Design | $2,500,000 |
| 24 | Ross & Baruzzini | $2,404,599 |
| 25 | Newcomb & Boyd | $2,166,918 |
| 26 | Sparling | $2,151,181 |
| 27 | KPFF Consulting Engineers | $2,000,000 |
| 27 | Rolf Jensen & Associates | $2,000,000 |
| 29 | Smith Seckman Reid | $1,273,546 |
| 30 | Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers | $1,098,183 |
| 31 | Vanderweil Engineers | $1,078,000 |
| 32 | Heapy Engineering | $1,071,676 |
| 33 | TTG | $1,050,980 |
| 34 | CCRD Partners | $1,000,000 |
| 35 | Davis, Bowen & Friedel | $816,200 |
| 36 | Henderson Engineers | $779,884 |
| 37 | M-E Engineers | $750,000 |
| 38 | Interface Engineering | $572,371 |
| 39 | GRW | $487,940 |
| 40 | Spectrum Engineers | $436,740 |
| 41 | Aon Fire Protection Engineering | $400,000 |
| 41 | Paulus, Sokolowski and Sartor | $400,000 |
| 43 | Peter Basso Associates | $300,000 |
| 44 | Syska Hennessy Group | $278,129 |
| 45 | GRAEF | $259,738 |
| 46 | Apogee Consulting Group | $251,000 |
| 47 | KJWW Engineering Consultants | $242,970 |
| 48 | Simpson Gumpertz & Heger | $200,000 |
| 49 | H.F. Lenz | $180,000 |
| 50 | SSOE Group | $146,989 |
| 51 | Glumac | $128,000 |
| 52 | CTLGroup | $100,000 |
| 52 | Dunham Associates | $100,000 |
| 52 | Rist-Frost-Shumway Engineering | $100,000 |
| 55 | Total Building Commissioning | $71,349 |
| 56 | Walter P Moore | $29,068 |
| 57 | Brinjac Engineering | $16,166 |
| 58 | Environmental Systems Design | $10,000 |
| 59 | Shive-Hattery | $3,071 |
| 60 | CJL Engineering | $3,000 |
Top Military Sector Construction Firms
| Rank | Company | 2012 Military Revenue ($) |
| 1 | Balfour Beatty | $835,493,608 |
| 2 | Hensel Phelps | $705,861,979 |
| 3 | B. L. Harbert International | $504,804,208 |
| 4 | Clark Group | $459,441,089 |
| 5 | Lend Lease | $448,232,000 |
| 6 | ECC | $404,881,855 |
| 7 | JE Dunn Construction | $383,882,914 |
| 8 | Gilbane | $343,600,000 |
| 9 | Walsh Group, The | $312,117,849 |
| 10 | Manhattan Construction | $200,119,000 |
| 11 | Weitz Co., The | $190,000,000 |
| 12 | McCarthy Holdings | $182,000,000 |
| 13 | Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., The | $173,204,860 |
| 14 | Turner Corporation, The | $163,707,000 |
| 15 | Hunt Companies | $159,295,120 |
| 16 | Mortenson Construction | $141,767,000 |
| 17 | Swinerton Builders | $128,767,700 |
| 18 | Walbridge | $113,929,436 |
| 19 | Sundt Construction | $88,800,392 |
| 20 | CORE Construction Group | $82,025,741 |
| 21 | W. M. Jordan Co. | $72,506,220 |
| 22 | Yates Cos., The | $69,400,000 |
| 23 | Jones Lang LaSalle | $60,287,223 |
| 24 | Absher Construction | $55,810,000 |
| 25 | Haskell | $52,656,368 |
| 26 | Consigli Construction | $49,230,541 |
| 27 | Messer Construction | $33,725,402 |
| 28 | Skanska USA | $33,600,000 |
| 29 | Harkins Builders | $30,500,000 |
| 30 | Brasfield & Gorrie | $29,147,688 |
| 31 | Hunt Construction Group | $29,000,000 |
| 32 | Suffolk Construction | $28,999,924 |
| 33 | Barton Malow | $25,600,015 |
| 34 | PCL Construction Enterprises | $19,907,096 |
| 35 | Coakley & Williams Construction | $16,555,554 |
| 36 | New South Construction | $13,300,000 |
| 37 | S. M. Wilson & Co. | $9,637,564 |
| 38 | Hoffman Construction | $7,820,967 |
| 39 | C.W. Driver | $6,896,321 |
| 40 | Choate Construction | $4,921,619 |
| 41 | Robins & Morton | $4,200,000 |
| 42 | Bomel Construction | $2,400,000 |
| 43 | Flintco | $1,400,000 |
| 44 | KBE Building Corporation | $1,229,621 |
| 45 | Doster Construction | $1,124,889 |
| 46 | Hoar Construction | $1,101,000 |
| 47 | Graycor | $571,323 |
| 48 | Power Construction | $200,000 |
| 49 | Tutor Perini Corporation | $188,000 |
| 50 | Alberici Constructors | $100,186 |
| 51 | DPR Construction | $86,891 |
| 52 | E.W. Howell | $85,000 |
Read the full 2013 Giants 300 Report
Related Stories
Multifamily Housing | Mar 7, 2023
Multifamily housing development in Chicago takes design inspiration from patchwork and quilting
HUB 32, a 65-unit multifamily housing development, will provide affordable housing and community amenities in Chicago’s Garfield Park neighborhood. Brooks + Scarpa’s recently unveiled design takes inspiration from the American tradition of patchwork and quilting.
Industrial Facilities | Mar 6, 2023
The largest planned logistics and business park in North America gets under way in Southern California
The $25 billion World Logistics Center will boost the supply chain capabilities of Southern California and will serve as a distribution center for destinations across the continent.
Healthcare Facilities | Mar 6, 2023
NBBJ kicks off new design podcast with discussion on behavioral health facilities
During the second week of November, the architecture firm NBBJ launched a podcast series called Uplift, that focuses on the transformative power of design. Its first 30-minute episode homed in on designing for behavioral healthcare facilities, a hot topic given the increasing number of new construction and renovation projects in this subsector.
Adaptive Reuse | Mar 5, 2023
Pittsburgh offers funds for office-to-residential conversions
The City of Pittsburgh’s redevelopment agency is accepting applications for funding from developers on projects to convert office buildings into affordable housing. The city’s goals are to improve downtown vitality, make better use of underutilized and vacant commercial office space, and alleviate a housing shortage.
Student Housing | Mar 5, 2023
Calif. governor Gavin Newsom seeks to reform environmental law used to block student housing
California Gov. Gavin Newsom wants to reform a landmark state environmental law that he says was weaponized by wealthy homeowners to block badly needed housing for students at the University of California, Berkeley.
Green Renovation | Mar 5, 2023
Dept. of Energy offers $22 million for energy efficiency and building electrification upgrades
The Buildings Upgrade Prize (Buildings UP) sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy is offering more than $22 million in cash prizes and technical assistance to teams across America. Prize recipients will be selected based on their ideas to accelerate widespread, equitable energy efficiency and building electrification upgrades.
Windows and Doors | Mar 5, 2023
2022 North American Fenestration Standard released
The 2022 edition of AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440, “North American Fenestration Standard/Specification for windows, doors, and skylights” (NAFS) has been published. The updated 2022 standard replaces the 2017 edition, part of a continued evolution of the standard to improve harmonization across North America, according to a news release.
AEC Innovators | Mar 3, 2023
Meet BD+C's 2023 AEC Innovators
More than ever, AEC firms and their suppliers are wedding innovation with corporate responsibility. How they are addressing climate change usually gets the headlines. But as the following articles in our AEC Innovators package chronicle, companies are attempting to make an impact as well on the integrity of their supply chains, the reduction of construction waste, and answering calls for more affordable housing and homeless shelters. As often as not, these companies are partnering with municipalities and nonprofit interest groups to help guide their production.
Modular Building | Mar 3, 2023
Pallet Shelter is fighting homelessness, one person and modular pod at a time
Everett, Wash.-based Pallet Inc. helped the City of Burlington, Vt., turn a municipal parking lot into an emergency shelter community, complete with 30 modular “sleeping cabins” for the homeless.
Codes | Mar 2, 2023
Biden Administration’s proposed building materials rules increase domestic requirements
The Biden Administration’s proposal on building materials rules used on federal construction and federally funded state and local buildings would significantly boost the made-in-America mandate. In the past, products could qualify as domestically made if at least 55% of the value of their components were from the U.S.
