flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

Codes and Standards

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. 


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | April 22, 2015
OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The Construction Industry Safety Coalition will cost the industry $5 billion per year. Image: Morgue File/PenMac

A new report by the Construction Industry Safety Coalition (CISC) found that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) proposed silica standards for U.S. construction industry will cost the industry $5 billion per year. That’s about $4.5 billion per year more than OSHA’s estimate.

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. The proposed rule aims to greatly reduce the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of crystalline silica for the construction industry.

The agency pegged the cost to the construction industry at about $511 million a year. “The OSHA analysis included major errors and omissions that account for the large discrepancies with the CISC report,” according to a statement from the industry group.

The CISC report estimates that about 80% of the cost ($3.9 billion/year) will be direct compliance expenditures by the industry such as additional equipment, labor and record-keeping costs.

The remaining 20% will come from increased prices that the industry will have to pay for construction materials and building products such as concrete block, glass, and roofing shingles. OSHA’s estimates failed to take into account these additional costs, CISC says. The added cost would be passed down to customers, the industry group says.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Sep 22, 2021

Group proposes Carbon Use Intensity metric for new buildings

Plan would track embedded carbon on projects.

Codes and Standards | Sep 22, 2021

Cities need to step up flood mitigation efforts to save lives

Recent storms highlight climate change dangers.

Codes and Standards | Sep 21, 2021

Steps to improve ventilation for Covid can combat colds and flu

New look at airborne disease spread shows time viruses linger in air may have been underestimated.

Codes and Standards | Sep 15, 2021

USGBC will change leaders, conduct strategic review

Aims to ensure organization is ‘well positioned to scale its work in the post-pandemic world’.

Codes and Standards | Sep 15, 2021

LEED-certified offices earn higher rents than non-sustainable properties

Are also more resilient to dips in real estate market.

Codes and Standards | Sep 7, 2021

Boston turns to developer fees to fund flood protection infrastructure

Assessments on commercial properties will help build seawall and other protective measures.

Codes and Standards | Sep 3, 2021

Low-cost methods can have substantial impact on reducing embodied carbon

Whole-building design, material substitution, and specification strategies can slash carbon by up to 46%.

Codes and Standards | Sep 2, 2021

Case for power resiliency in buildings grows with more disaster and outages

Essential businesses like data centers, hospitals are first adopters of new storage systems.

Codes and Standards | Aug 31, 2021

UK industry group wants mandatory whole-life carbon assessments of buildings

Aims to address hidden emissions embedded in supply chains.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021