flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

Codes and Standards

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. 


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | April 22, 2015
OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The Construction Industry Safety Coalition will cost the industry $5 billion per year. Image: Morgue File/PenMac

A new report by the Construction Industry Safety Coalition (CISC) found that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) proposed silica standards for U.S. construction industry will cost the industry $5 billion per year. That’s about $4.5 billion per year more than OSHA’s estimate.

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. The proposed rule aims to greatly reduce the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of crystalline silica for the construction industry.

The agency pegged the cost to the construction industry at about $511 million a year. “The OSHA analysis included major errors and omissions that account for the large discrepancies with the CISC report,” according to a statement from the industry group.

The CISC report estimates that about 80% of the cost ($3.9 billion/year) will be direct compliance expenditures by the industry such as additional equipment, labor and record-keeping costs.

The remaining 20% will come from increased prices that the industry will have to pay for construction materials and building products such as concrete block, glass, and roofing shingles. OSHA’s estimates failed to take into account these additional costs, CISC says. The added cost would be passed down to customers, the industry group says.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | May 18, 2021

Cross-laminated timber performs better than expected in shear test

Tests conducted in support of new criteria for design of CLT diaphragm.

Codes and Standards | May 13, 2021

LEED-certified federal buildings don’t use less energy than average

May be due to trade-offs on how score is developed.

Codes and Standards | May 12, 2021

White paper examines how to reduce pathogen transmission in ventilation

Pressure barriers and airflow distribution can be effective in existing buildings.

Codes and Standards | May 11, 2021

Pressure builds on White House to rein in cost of lumber

Spike in prices has added nearly $36,000 to price of average new home.

Codes and Standards | May 11, 2021

Residential codes should be upgraded to protect from cooking pollutants

Report examines ventilation standards, calls for increased public awareness of issue.

Codes and Standards | May 6, 2021

Blue roofs can provide relief to overwhelmed stormwater systems

Benefits most evident in industrial commercial areas.

Codes and Standards | May 5, 2021

Majority of schools took steps to improve air quality during pandemic

Districts still have unmet needs, face high costs and outdated building infrastructure.

Codes and Standards | May 3, 2021

Fire stops critical to preserving three-decker housing

Old multi-family structures continue to provide badly needed homes in urban zones.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021