flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

Codes and Standards

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. 


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | April 22, 2015
OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The Construction Industry Safety Coalition will cost the industry $5 billion per year. Image: Morgue File/PenMac

A new report by the Construction Industry Safety Coalition (CISC) found that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) proposed silica standards for U.S. construction industry will cost the industry $5 billion per year. That’s about $4.5 billion per year more than OSHA’s estimate.

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. The proposed rule aims to greatly reduce the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of crystalline silica for the construction industry.

The agency pegged the cost to the construction industry at about $511 million a year. “The OSHA analysis included major errors and omissions that account for the large discrepancies with the CISC report,” according to a statement from the industry group.

The CISC report estimates that about 80% of the cost ($3.9 billion/year) will be direct compliance expenditures by the industry such as additional equipment, labor and record-keeping costs.

The remaining 20% will come from increased prices that the industry will have to pay for construction materials and building products such as concrete block, glass, and roofing shingles. OSHA’s estimates failed to take into account these additional costs, CISC says. The added cost would be passed down to customers, the industry group says.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Jul 9, 2020

Funding opportunity for field validation of high-impact building technologies

Dept. of Energy program targets dynamic interactions with electric grid.

Codes and Standards | Jul 8, 2020

Standards for reducing risk of COVID-19 in senior living communities

AIA releases strategies and illustrations for the sector.

Codes and Standards | Jul 6, 2020

Guide presents benefits of public-private partnerships

Discusses process from project conception to construction.

Codes and Standards | Jul 1, 2020

COVID-19 public health guidelines may be downplaying building systems solutions

Emphasis on cleaning surfaces overlooks importance of mechanical infrastructure.

Codes and Standards | Jun 30, 2020

WELL building institute steps up health safety rating for hotels and resorts

Certification body forms advisory group of industry leaders and health experts.

Codes and Standards | Jun 30, 2020

7 must reads for the AEC industry today: June 30, 2020

Affordable housing comes to the Bay Area and this is not the end of cities.

Codes and Standards | Jun 29, 2020

Mandated building retrofits are necessary to meet climate crisis

Performance standards could greatly reduce GHG emissions.

Codes and Standards | Jun 29, 2020

New buildings can fall short of designed performance

Similar structures can produce different energy usage results.

Codes and Standards | Jun 25, 2020

Arc offers tools, analytics for safe workplace re-entry

Platform helps sustainability teams to collect data, benchmark progress, measure impact, and improve performance.

Codes and Standards | Jun 24, 2020

New API enables design and construction technology platforms to connect

Construction Specifications Institute offers “digital classification engine.”

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021