flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

Codes and Standards

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. 


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | April 22, 2015
OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The Construction Industry Safety Coalition will cost the industry $5 billion per year. Image: Morgue File/PenMac

A new report by the Construction Industry Safety Coalition (CISC) found that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) proposed silica standards for U.S. construction industry will cost the industry $5 billion per year. That’s about $4.5 billion per year more than OSHA’s estimate.

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. The proposed rule aims to greatly reduce the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of crystalline silica for the construction industry.

The agency pegged the cost to the construction industry at about $511 million a year. “The OSHA analysis included major errors and omissions that account for the large discrepancies with the CISC report,” according to a statement from the industry group.

The CISC report estimates that about 80% of the cost ($3.9 billion/year) will be direct compliance expenditures by the industry such as additional equipment, labor and record-keeping costs.

The remaining 20% will come from increased prices that the industry will have to pay for construction materials and building products such as concrete block, glass, and roofing shingles. OSHA’s estimates failed to take into account these additional costs, CISC says. The added cost would be passed down to customers, the industry group says.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Jun 8, 2020

OSHA construction safety inspections fall 84% during COVID-19 pandemic

Agency focuses on preventing disease transmission in healthcare industry.

Codes and Standards | Jun 8, 2020

5 must reads for the AEC industry today: June 8, 2020

Frank Lloyd Wright sites set to reopen and construction jobs rise by 464,000.

Codes and Standards | Jun 8, 2020

Reopened offices raise liability risk for businesses and owners

Risks may not be covered by property insurance.

Codes and Standards | Jun 4, 2020

American Wood Council updates report on fire resistance of wood members and assemblies

Provides new examples and background on mass timber calculations.

Codes and Standards | Jun 3, 2020

Virginia makes GCs liable for subs employee wages

New law allows workers to sue GCs for wages in class action.

Codes and Standards | Jun 2, 2020

Designers, owners reinventing restaurants to cope with COVID-19

Options include rearranged seating, mobile ordering, designated flow spaces.

Codes and Standards | Jun 1, 2020

How owners should comply with OSHA roofing safety guidelines

Buildings should have fall protection and restraint provisions for those who go on roofs.

Codes and Standards | May 29, 2020

AIA releases new, updated sustainable project documents

Streamlined sustainable design and construction process included.

Codes and Standards | May 28, 2020

USGBC outlines how it will support pandemic recovery efforts

Includes emergency guidance and upgrades to the LEED green building program.

Codes and Standards | May 27, 2020

Office market could be COVID-19 casualty

As companies get used to work at home, post-pandemic office market could collapse.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021