flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Process leads to new design values for southern pine and other visually graded dimension lumber

Process leads to new design values for southern pine and other visually graded dimension lumber


By BD+C Staff | October 20, 2011
A summary of the process used to develop new design values will clarify many of the questions received by the SFPA.

The Southern Forest Products Association (SFPA) does not test lumber or establish design values. SFPA markets lumber products and helps users understand Southern Pine grading rules and design values. “Our objective is to provide information helpful to our member producers and their customers,” said SFPA president Adrian Blocker. “We feel a summary of the process used to develop new design values will clarify many of the questions we have received.”

Design values for structural lumber go through a rigorous, step-by-step process, including development by the appropriate rules-writing agency (such as the Southern Pine Inspection Bureau (SPIB) for Southern Pine), approval by the American Lumber Standard Committee (ALSC) Board of Review, and adoption into the building codes by the International Codes Council.

  1. ALSC provides the basis for design value acceptance. ALSC serves as the standing committee for the American Softwood Lumber Standard, Voluntary Product Standard PS 20, developed in accordance with U.S. Department of Commerce procedures. ALSC administers the American Lumber Standard system which provides the basis for acceptance of lumber and design values for lumber by the building codes throughout the U.S. The last major change for visually graded dimension lumber occurred in 1991 when design values for Southern Pine and other North American species were published based on In-Grade testing of full-size samples of commercially produced lumber.
  2. The resource is monitored by rules-writing agencies. Since 1994, the Southern Pine Inspection Bureau (SPIB) has conducted an annual resource monitoring program developed in collaboration with the U.S. Forest Products Laboratory (FPL).
  3. Possible resource changes are detected. During 17 years of resource monitoring by SPIB, the level established to trigger additional testing was never reached. However, overall trends in the annual test data suggested a possible shift in the raw material resource or product mix. These trends, along with anecdotal external information, prompted SPIB to conduct an enhanced testing program.
  4. Sampling and testing plans are approved by the ALSC Board of Review. SPIB’s Special Procedures for Monitoring Southern Pine Design Values plan was approved on November 18, 2010.
  5. Testing and data analysis is conducted by rules-writing agencies. SPIB partnered with Timber Products Inspection to sample No.2 2x4 test specimens according to the approved plan. SPIB and Timber Products conducted destructive tests in bending and tension, plus gathered stiffness and property data, all in accordance with ASTM International standards. SPIB performed the data analysis, also in conformance with ASTM standards. The SPIB Board of Governors studied the results and considered all options, including the possibility of modifying SPIB’s Standard Grading Rules for Southern Pine Lumber to cull out the lowest strength pieces. The conclusion reached was that the test results did not support such a grading rule change. Instead, the SPIB Board of Governors concluded the appropriate outcome was to propose new design values for all grades and sizes of visually graded Southern Pine dimension lumber. Moving forward, the SPIB Board of Governors committed to the completion of the full In-Grade testing matrix by testing Select Structural 2x4s, No.2 and Select Structural 2x8s, and No.2 and Select Structural 2x10s. SPIB and Timber Products will conduct destructive tests in bending, tension and compression, plus gather stiffness and property data. Testing is scheduled to be completed by Spring 2012. 
  6. Proposed new design values are submitted to the ALSC Board of Review by rules-writing agencies. SPIB was the first agency to submit proposed new design values. The National Lumber Grading Authority has submitted its monitoring data. All other rules-writing agencies are immediately undertaking evaluation of their resources and have submitted sampling and testing plans for their species to the ALSC Board of Review.
  7. Technical review is performed by the U.S. Forest Products Laboratory at the request of the ALSC Board of Review.
  8. New design values are approved by the ALSC Board of Review. The ALSC Board of Review will review information involving design values for all species at its next meeting, scheduled for October 20, 2011. New design values for Southern Pine could be approved at that meeting. Or, the ALSC Board of Review may decide additional information, such as the results from SPIB’s full In-Grade matrix testing, is needed before granting final approval.
  9. New design values are published by rules-writing agencies. SPIB will publish new design values for visually graded Southern Pine dimension lumber upon approval by the ALSC Board of Review.
  10. New design values are incorporated into the building codes by reference through the National Design Specification® (NDS®). The American Wood Council (AWC) will update the NDS Design Value Supplement, a compendium of approved lumber design values published by rules-writing agencies. In addition, AWC will update the Wood Frame Construction Manual (WFCM) which references the NDS supplement for development of prescriptive designs. AWC will submit new span and application tables to the International Codes Council, as well as propose other code and standard changes needed to incorporate new design values into the building codes.

State and local code jurisdictions determine adoption and enforcement timelines. Rules-writing agencies are responsible for making new design values publically available upon approval by the ALSC Board of Review. SFPA and AWC will assist by providing the new information to the design, specification, user, and enforcement communities. It is then the responsibility of building code jurisdictions to determine how and when to begin enforcement.

“SFPA is the marketing organization that communicates new design value information with key customer groups and allied industry organizations,” said Blocker. “Many in the construction industry, including SFPA, support an orderly and logical transition for achieving a timely changeover to new design values while avoiding project stoppages or delays. BD+C

Related Stories

Office Buildings | Feb 9, 2023

Post-Covid Manhattan office market rebound gaining momentum

Office workers in Manhattan continue to return to their workplaces in sufficient numbers for many of their employers to maintain or expand their footprint in the city, according to a survey of more than 140 major Manhattan office employers conducted in January by The Partnership for New York City.

Giants 400 | Feb 9, 2023

New Giants 400 download: Get the complete at-a-glance 2022 Giants 400 rankings in Excel

See how your architecture, engineering, or construction firm stacks up against the nation's AEC Giants. For more than 45 years, the editors of Building Design+Construction have surveyed the largest AEC firms in the U.S./Canada to create the annual Giants 400 report. This year, a record 519 firms participated in the Giants 400 report. The final report includes 137 rankings across 25 building sectors and specialty categories.   

University Buildings | Feb 8, 2023

STEM-focused Kettering University opens Stantec-designed Learning Commons

In Flint, Mich., Kettering University opened its new $63 million Learning Commons, designed by Stantec. The new facility will support collaboration, ideation, and digital technology for the STEM-focused higher learning institution.

Sustainability | Feb 8, 2023

A wind energy system—without the blades—can be placed on commercial building rooftops

Aeromine Technologies’ bladeless system captures and amplifies a building’s airflow like airfoils on a race car.

Codes and Standards | Feb 8, 2023

GSA releases draft of federal low embodied carbon material standards

The General Services Administration recently released a document that outlines standards for low embodied carbon materials and products to be used on federal construction projects.

University Buildings | Feb 7, 2023

Kansas City University's Center for Medical Education Innovation can adapt to changes in medical curriculum

The Center for Medical Education Innovation (CMEI) at Kansas City University was designed to adapt to changes in medical curriculum and pedagogy. The project program supported the mission of training leaders in osteopathic medicine with a state-of-the-art facility that leverages active-learning and simulation-based training.

Multifamily Housing | Feb 7, 2023

Multifamily housing rents flat in January, developers remain optimistic

Multifamily rents were flat in January 2023 as a strong jobs report indicated that fears of a significant economic recession may be overblown. U.S. asking rents averaged $1,701, unchanged from the prior month, according to the latest Yardi Matrix National Multifamily Report.

Giants 400 | Feb 6, 2023

2022 Reconstruction Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. building reconstruction and renovation sector

Gensler, Stantec, IPS, Alfa Tech, STO Building Group, and Turner Construction top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest reconstruction sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Feb 6, 2023

2022 Transit Facility Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. transit facility sector

Walsh Group, Skanska USA, HDR, Perkins and Will, and AECOM top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest transit facility sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Feb 6, 2023

2022 Telecommunications Facility Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. telecommunications facility sector

AECOM, Alfa Tech, Kraus-Anderson, and Stantec head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest telecommunications facility sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2022 Giants 400 Report.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Urban Planning

Bridging the gap: How early architect involvement can revolutionize a city’s capital improvement plans

Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs) typically span three to five years and outline future city projects and their costs. While they set the stage, the design and construction of these projects often extend beyond the CIP window, leading to a disconnect between the initial budget and evolving project scope. This can result in financial shortfalls, forcing cities to cut back on critical project features.



Libraries

Reasons to reinvent the Midcentury academic library

DLR Group's Interior Design Leader Gretchen Holy, Assoc. IIDA, shares the idea that a designer's responsibility to embrace a library’s history, respect its past, and create an environment that will serve student populations for the next 100 years.

halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021