Top Science and Technology Sector Architecture Firms
| Rank | Company | 2013 S&T Sector Revenue |
| 1 | HDR | $55,700,000 |
| 2 | HOK | $50,260,857 |
| 3 | Stantec | $46,654,078 |
| 4 | Flad Architects | $38,940,000 |
| 5 | Perkins+will | $37,475,908 |
| 6 | Payette | $30,980,610 |
| 7 | SmithGroupJJR | $19,384,285 |
| 8 | EwingCole | $12,175,000 |
| 9 | ZGF Architects | $10,606,469 |
| 10 | Harley Ellis Devereaux | $9,340,000 |
| 11 | Ennead Architects | $6,158,951 |
| 12 | Kirksey | $5,138,330 |
| 13 | RS&H | $4,900,000 |
| 14 | NBBJ | $4,582,000 |
| 15 | Hastings+Chivetta Architects | $3,874,537 |
| 16 | RTKL Associates | $3,488,000 |
| 17 | Perkins Eastman | $3,100,000 |
| 18 | BSA LifeStructures | $2,854,789 |
| 19 | Clark Nexsen | $2,673,019 |
| 20 | Lord Aeck Sargent | $2,186,460 |
| 21 | HKS | $2,138,731 |
| 22 | EYP Architecture & Engineering | $2,000,000 |
| 23 | Shepley Bulfinch | $1,770,000 |
| 24 | Emersion Design | $1,726,902 |
| 25 | Bergmann Associates | $1,700,000 |
| 26 | Gensler | $1,644,004 |
| 27 | Ballinger | $1,608,659 |
| 28 | WHR Architects | $1,560,060 |
| 29 | Solomon Cordwell Buenz | $1,500,000 |
| 30 | Ware Malcomb | $1,449,500 |
| 31 | Hammel, Green and Abrahamson | $1,399,297 |
| 32 | Symmes Maini & McKee Associates | $1,290,000 |
| 33 | Page | $1,250,000 |
| 34 | NORR | $1,037,901 |
| 35 | FKP Architects | $1,000,000 |
| 36 | Francis Cauffman | $794,987 |
| 37 | VOA Associates | $794,232 |
| 38 | Heery International | $791,990 |
| 39 | Cooper Carry | $755,279 |
| 40 | DesignGroup | $676,860 |
| 41 | Skidmore, Owings & Merrill | $578,240 |
| 42 | RSP Architects | $552,000 |
| 43 | Swanke Hayden Connell Architects | $545,000 |
| 44 | Epstein | $506,000 |
| 45 | Wilson Architects | $500,000 |
| 46 | S/L/A/M Collaborative, The | $495,535 |
| 47 | Nelson | $404,850 |
| 48 | CTA Architects Engineers | $306,754 |
| 49 | JRS Architect | $145,000 |
| 50 | Harvard Jolly Architecture | $120,530 |
| 51 | Margulies Perruzzi Architects | $119,521 |
| 52 | KZF Design | $71,077 |
| 53 | Commonwealth Architects | $69,580 |
| 54 | Baskervill | $41,280 |
| 55 | Little | $33,876 |
| 56 | NAC|Architecture | $17,236 |
| 57 | Ratio Architects | $1,379 |
Top Science and Technology Sector Engineering Firms
| Rank | Company | 2013 S&T Sector Revenue |
| 1 | Affiliated Engineers | $28,609,000 |
| 2 | URS Corp. | $15,213,288 |
| 3 | WSP Group | $13,550,000 |
| 4 | Jacobs | $10,760,000 |
| 5 | Vanderweil Engineers | $9,556,500 |
| 6 | RMF Engineering | $8,900,000 |
| 7 | CRB | $8,200,000 |
| 8 | Paulus, Sokolowski and Sartor | $5,200,000 |
| 9 | BR+A Consulting Engineers | $4,600,000 |
| 10 | Degenkolb Engineers | $4,476,429 |
| 11 | CCRD Partners | $3,530,000 |
| 12 | Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers | $3,479,323 |
| 13 | Mazzetti | $3,044,920 |
| 14 | Rist-Frost-Shumway Engineering | $3,000,000 |
| 15 | RDK Engineers | $2,830,000 |
| 16 | M-E Engineers | $1,931,000 |
| 17 | Newcomb & Boyd | $1,831,915 |
| 18 | SSOE Group | $1,765,501 |
| 19 | Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corp. | $1,500,000 |
| 20 | Environmental Systems Design | $1,355,590 |
| 21 | STV | $1,114,000 |
| 22 | Glumac | $1,077,171 |
| 23 | Syska Hennessy Group | $985,040 |
| 24 | Karpinski Engineering | $868,633 |
| 25 | KPFF Consulting Engineers | $800,000 |
| 26 | AKF Group | $740,000 |
| 27 | P2S Engineering | $445,624 |
| 28 | KJWW Engineering Consultants | $385,407 |
| 29 | Interface Engineering | $348,341 |
| 30 | Coffman Engineers | $279,999 |
| 31 | Dunham Associates | $250,000 |
| 32 | TLC Engineering for Architecture | $239,313 |
| 33 | Henderson Engineers | $219,691 |
| 34 | Thornton Tomasetti | $213,485 |
| 35 | H.F. Lenz | $211,000 |
| 36 | I. C. Thomasson Associates | $200,000 |
| 37 | OLA Consulting Engineers | $184,800 |
| 38 | Davis, Bowen & Friedel | $174,710 |
| 39 | Allen & Shariff | $128,000 |
| 40 | Spectrum Engineers | $126,582 |
| 41 | TTG | $124,162 |
| 42 | CJL Engineering | $122,500 |
| 43 | Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates | $110,000 |
| 44 | Sparling | $107,790 |
| 45 | Wick Fisher White | $74,325 |
| 46 | Guernsey | $58,515 |
| 47 | Magnusson Klemencic Associates | $50,243 |
| 48 | French & Parrello Associates | $50,000 |
| 49 | Apogee Consulting Group | $42,320 |
| 50 | Walter P Moore and Associates | $41,790 |
| 51 | Zak Companies | $17,283 |
| 52 | Heapy Engineering | $14,759 |
| 53 | Brinjac Engineering | $8,704 |
Top Science and Technology Sector Construction Firms
| Rank | Company | 2013 S&T Sector Revenue |
| 1 | Skanska USA | $567,520,664 |
| 2 | DPR Construction | $269,947,839 |
| 3 | Turner Construction | $205,000,000 |
| 4 | Suffolk Construction | $164,816,499 |
| 5 | JE Dunn Construction | $162,998,885 |
| 6 | Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., The | $144,884,163 |
| 7 | Structure Tone | $92,170,000 |
| 8 | Kraus-Anderson Construction | $75,000,000 |
| 9 | Consigli Construction | $70,990,917 |
| 10 | Hathaway Dinwiddie Construction | $44,180,000 |
| 11 | Choate Construction | $38,400,718 |
| 12 | Manhattan Construction | $36,800,000 |
| 13 | LeChase Construction Services | $32,800,000 |
| 14 | McCarthy Holdings | $32,000,000 |
| 15 | Hill & Wilkinson | $30,263,000 |
| 16 | Hensel Phelps | $30,090,000 |
| 17 | McGough | $24,000,000 |
| 18 | Flintco | $14,250,000 |
| 19 | Alberici Constructors | $10,407,230 |
| 20 | S. M. Wilson & Co. | $10,383,344 |
| 21 | E.W. Howell | $9,541,000 |
| 22 | Hill International | $9,000,000 |
| 23 | Fortis Construction | $7,700,000 |
| 24 | Hoar Construction | $6,050,000 |
| 25 | Shawmut Design and Construction | $5,000,000 |
| 26 | HITT Contracting | $4,200,000 |
| 27 | Messer Construction | $3,491,416 |
| 28 | Tutor Perini Corp. | $3,447,967 |
| 29 | James G. Davis Construction | $2,884,634 |
| 30 | Stalco Construction | $2,602,000 |
| 31 | O'Neil Industries/W.E. O'Neil | $1,820,063 |
| 32 | BlueScope Construction | $1,555,063 |
| 33 | Coakley & Williams Construction | $1,514,454 |
| 34 | STV | $1,114,000 |
| 35 | Heery International | $791,990 |
| 36 | Bomel Construction | $578,354 |
| 37 | Weitz Company, The | $215,744 |
| 38 | JLL | $172,953 |
| 39 | W. M. Jordan Company | $171,674 |
| 40 | Allen & Shariff | $128,000 |
| 41 | Austin Commercial | $60,044 |
Read BD+C's full 2014 Giants 300 Report
Related Stories
| Oct 27, 2011
ASSA Abloy, MAXXESS Systems announce U.S. Aperio integration
Aperio will integrate with MAXXESS's eAXxess and Efusion Event Management Software packages.
| Oct 26, 2011
Metl-Span selected for re-roof project
School remained in session during the renovation and it was important to minimize the disruption as much as possible.
| Oct 26, 2011
Shawmut Design and Construction awarded Tag Heuer build in Aventura, Fla.
New store features 1,200 sf fit out at Aventura Mall.
| Oct 25, 2011
HKS Science & Technology practice formed
Specializing in the planning and design of highly technical building types, HKS’s Science & Technology practice offers the broadest range of services available to the academic and biomedical research, biotechnology, pharmaceutical and medical device community, including laboratory programming, planning and design, strategic science planning and laboratory equipment planning.
| Oct 25, 2011
Universal teams up with Earthbound Corp. to provide streamlined commercial framing solutions
The primary market for the Intact Structural Frame is light commercial buildings that are typically designed with concrete masonry walls, steel joists and steel decks.
| Oct 25, 2011
Ritner Steel CEO elected to AISC Board
Freund will begin serving on the AISC board of directors, assisting with the organization's planning and leadership in the steel construction industry.
| Oct 25, 2011
Commitment to green building practices pays off
The study, conducted by the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, built on a good indication of the potential for increased productivity and performance pilot research completed two years ago, with similarly impressive results.
| Oct 25, 2011
DOE issues report on financing solar photovoltaic systems for K-12 schools
The report examines the two primary types of ownership models used to obtain solar installations. This analysis can help school administrators across the country select the best option for deploying solar technologies in their school districts.
