Top Science and Technology Sector Architecture Firms
| Rank | Company | 2013 S&T Sector Revenue |
| 1 | HDR | $55,700,000 |
| 2 | HOK | $50,260,857 |
| 3 | Stantec | $46,654,078 |
| 4 | Flad Architects | $38,940,000 |
| 5 | Perkins+will | $37,475,908 |
| 6 | Payette | $30,980,610 |
| 7 | SmithGroupJJR | $19,384,285 |
| 8 | EwingCole | $12,175,000 |
| 9 | ZGF Architects | $10,606,469 |
| 10 | Harley Ellis Devereaux | $9,340,000 |
| 11 | Ennead Architects | $6,158,951 |
| 12 | Kirksey | $5,138,330 |
| 13 | RS&H | $4,900,000 |
| 14 | NBBJ | $4,582,000 |
| 15 | Hastings+Chivetta Architects | $3,874,537 |
| 16 | RTKL Associates | $3,488,000 |
| 17 | Perkins Eastman | $3,100,000 |
| 18 | BSA LifeStructures | $2,854,789 |
| 19 | Clark Nexsen | $2,673,019 |
| 20 | Lord Aeck Sargent | $2,186,460 |
| 21 | HKS | $2,138,731 |
| 22 | EYP Architecture & Engineering | $2,000,000 |
| 23 | Shepley Bulfinch | $1,770,000 |
| 24 | Emersion Design | $1,726,902 |
| 25 | Bergmann Associates | $1,700,000 |
| 26 | Gensler | $1,644,004 |
| 27 | Ballinger | $1,608,659 |
| 28 | WHR Architects | $1,560,060 |
| 29 | Solomon Cordwell Buenz | $1,500,000 |
| 30 | Ware Malcomb | $1,449,500 |
| 31 | Hammel, Green and Abrahamson | $1,399,297 |
| 32 | Symmes Maini & McKee Associates | $1,290,000 |
| 33 | Page | $1,250,000 |
| 34 | NORR | $1,037,901 |
| 35 | FKP Architects | $1,000,000 |
| 36 | Francis Cauffman | $794,987 |
| 37 | VOA Associates | $794,232 |
| 38 | Heery International | $791,990 |
| 39 | Cooper Carry | $755,279 |
| 40 | DesignGroup | $676,860 |
| 41 | Skidmore, Owings & Merrill | $578,240 |
| 42 | RSP Architects | $552,000 |
| 43 | Swanke Hayden Connell Architects | $545,000 |
| 44 | Epstein | $506,000 |
| 45 | Wilson Architects | $500,000 |
| 46 | S/L/A/M Collaborative, The | $495,535 |
| 47 | Nelson | $404,850 |
| 48 | CTA Architects Engineers | $306,754 |
| 49 | JRS Architect | $145,000 |
| 50 | Harvard Jolly Architecture | $120,530 |
| 51 | Margulies Perruzzi Architects | $119,521 |
| 52 | KZF Design | $71,077 |
| 53 | Commonwealth Architects | $69,580 |
| 54 | Baskervill | $41,280 |
| 55 | Little | $33,876 |
| 56 | NAC|Architecture | $17,236 |
| 57 | Ratio Architects | $1,379 |
Top Science and Technology Sector Engineering Firms
| Rank | Company | 2013 S&T Sector Revenue |
| 1 | Affiliated Engineers | $28,609,000 |
| 2 | URS Corp. | $15,213,288 |
| 3 | WSP Group | $13,550,000 |
| 4 | Jacobs | $10,760,000 |
| 5 | Vanderweil Engineers | $9,556,500 |
| 6 | RMF Engineering | $8,900,000 |
| 7 | CRB | $8,200,000 |
| 8 | Paulus, Sokolowski and Sartor | $5,200,000 |
| 9 | BR+A Consulting Engineers | $4,600,000 |
| 10 | Degenkolb Engineers | $4,476,429 |
| 11 | CCRD Partners | $3,530,000 |
| 12 | Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers | $3,479,323 |
| 13 | Mazzetti | $3,044,920 |
| 14 | Rist-Frost-Shumway Engineering | $3,000,000 |
| 15 | RDK Engineers | $2,830,000 |
| 16 | M-E Engineers | $1,931,000 |
| 17 | Newcomb & Boyd | $1,831,915 |
| 18 | SSOE Group | $1,765,501 |
| 19 | Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corp. | $1,500,000 |
| 20 | Environmental Systems Design | $1,355,590 |
| 21 | STV | $1,114,000 |
| 22 | Glumac | $1,077,171 |
| 23 | Syska Hennessy Group | $985,040 |
| 24 | Karpinski Engineering | $868,633 |
| 25 | KPFF Consulting Engineers | $800,000 |
| 26 | AKF Group | $740,000 |
| 27 | P2S Engineering | $445,624 |
| 28 | KJWW Engineering Consultants | $385,407 |
| 29 | Interface Engineering | $348,341 |
| 30 | Coffman Engineers | $279,999 |
| 31 | Dunham Associates | $250,000 |
| 32 | TLC Engineering for Architecture | $239,313 |
| 33 | Henderson Engineers | $219,691 |
| 34 | Thornton Tomasetti | $213,485 |
| 35 | H.F. Lenz | $211,000 |
| 36 | I. C. Thomasson Associates | $200,000 |
| 37 | OLA Consulting Engineers | $184,800 |
| 38 | Davis, Bowen & Friedel | $174,710 |
| 39 | Allen & Shariff | $128,000 |
| 40 | Spectrum Engineers | $126,582 |
| 41 | TTG | $124,162 |
| 42 | CJL Engineering | $122,500 |
| 43 | Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates | $110,000 |
| 44 | Sparling | $107,790 |
| 45 | Wick Fisher White | $74,325 |
| 46 | Guernsey | $58,515 |
| 47 | Magnusson Klemencic Associates | $50,243 |
| 48 | French & Parrello Associates | $50,000 |
| 49 | Apogee Consulting Group | $42,320 |
| 50 | Walter P Moore and Associates | $41,790 |
| 51 | Zak Companies | $17,283 |
| 52 | Heapy Engineering | $14,759 |
| 53 | Brinjac Engineering | $8,704 |
Top Science and Technology Sector Construction Firms
| Rank | Company | 2013 S&T Sector Revenue |
| 1 | Skanska USA | $567,520,664 |
| 2 | DPR Construction | $269,947,839 |
| 3 | Turner Construction | $205,000,000 |
| 4 | Suffolk Construction | $164,816,499 |
| 5 | JE Dunn Construction | $162,998,885 |
| 6 | Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., The | $144,884,163 |
| 7 | Structure Tone | $92,170,000 |
| 8 | Kraus-Anderson Construction | $75,000,000 |
| 9 | Consigli Construction | $70,990,917 |
| 10 | Hathaway Dinwiddie Construction | $44,180,000 |
| 11 | Choate Construction | $38,400,718 |
| 12 | Manhattan Construction | $36,800,000 |
| 13 | LeChase Construction Services | $32,800,000 |
| 14 | McCarthy Holdings | $32,000,000 |
| 15 | Hill & Wilkinson | $30,263,000 |
| 16 | Hensel Phelps | $30,090,000 |
| 17 | McGough | $24,000,000 |
| 18 | Flintco | $14,250,000 |
| 19 | Alberici Constructors | $10,407,230 |
| 20 | S. M. Wilson & Co. | $10,383,344 |
| 21 | E.W. Howell | $9,541,000 |
| 22 | Hill International | $9,000,000 |
| 23 | Fortis Construction | $7,700,000 |
| 24 | Hoar Construction | $6,050,000 |
| 25 | Shawmut Design and Construction | $5,000,000 |
| 26 | HITT Contracting | $4,200,000 |
| 27 | Messer Construction | $3,491,416 |
| 28 | Tutor Perini Corp. | $3,447,967 |
| 29 | James G. Davis Construction | $2,884,634 |
| 30 | Stalco Construction | $2,602,000 |
| 31 | O'Neil Industries/W.E. O'Neil | $1,820,063 |
| 32 | BlueScope Construction | $1,555,063 |
| 33 | Coakley & Williams Construction | $1,514,454 |
| 34 | STV | $1,114,000 |
| 35 | Heery International | $791,990 |
| 36 | Bomel Construction | $578,354 |
| 37 | Weitz Company, The | $215,744 |
| 38 | JLL | $172,953 |
| 39 | W. M. Jordan Company | $171,674 |
| 40 | Allen & Shariff | $128,000 |
| 41 | Austin Commercial | $60,044 |
Read BD+C's full 2014 Giants 300 Report
Related Stories
K-12 Schools | Feb 18, 2023
Atlanta suburb opens $85 million serpentine-shaped high school designed by Perkins&Will
In Ellenwood, Ga., a southeast suburb of Atlanta, Perkins and Will has partnered with Clayton County Public Schools and MEJA Construction to create a $85 million secondary school. Morrow High School, which opened in fall 2022, serves more than 2,200 students in Clayton County, a community with students from over 30 countries.
Museums | Feb 17, 2023
First Americans Museum uses design metaphors of natural elements to honor native worldview
First Americans Museum (FAM) in Oklahoma City honors the 39 tribes in Oklahoma today, reflecting their history through design metaphors of nature’s elements of earth, wind, water, and fire. The design concept includes multiple circles suggested by arcs, reflecting the native tradition of a circular worldview that encompasses the cycle of life, the seasons, and the rotation of the earth.
Architects | Feb 17, 2023
Architect of the Capitol fired by President Biden after strong bipartisan criticism
Architect of the Capitol J. Brett Blanton was let go this week following alleged abuse of authority, misuse of government property, and wasted taxpayer money.
High-rise Construction | Feb 15, 2023
Bjarke Ingels' 'leaning towers' concept wins Qianhai Prisma Towers design competition
A pair of sloped high-rises—a 300-meter residential tower and a 250-meter office tower—highlight the Qianhai Prisma Towers development in Qianhai, Shenzhen, China. BIG recently won the design competition for the project.
Senior Living Design | Feb 15, 2023
Passive House affordable senior housing project opens in Boston
Work on Phase Three C of The Anne M. Lynch Homes at Old Colony, a 55-apartment midrise building in Boston that stands out for its use of Passive House design principles, was recently completed. Designed by The Architectural Team (TAT), the four-story structure was informed throughout by Passive House principles and standards.
Designers | Feb 13, 2023
Hoffmann Architects + Engineers Establishes Diversity Advancement Scholarship Fund
Hoffmann Architects + Engineers, a design firm specializing in the rehabilitation of building exteriors, contributed $25,000 to fund the Hoffmann Diversity Advancement Scholarship, administered through the Connecticut Architecture Foundation. The fund provides scholarships for students from underrepresented racial or ethnic groups who are seeking degrees in architecture or engineering.
Office Buildings | Feb 12, 2023
Smyrna Ready Mix’s new office HQ mimics the patterns in the company’s onsite stone quarry
Designed by EOA Architects to showcase various concrete processes and applications, Smyrna Ready Mix's new office headquarters features vertical layering that mimics the patterns in the company’s stone quarry, located on the opposite end of the campus site. The building’s glass and concrete bands are meant to mirror the quarry’s natural contours and striations.
Multifamily Housing | Feb 11, 2023
8 Gold and Platinum multifamily projects from the NAHB's BALA Awards
This year's top BALA multifamily winners showcase leading design trends, judged by eight industry professionals from across the country.
Multifamily Housing | Feb 10, 2023
Dallas to get a 19-story, 351-unit residential high-rise
In Dallas, work has begun on a new multifamily high-rise called The Oliver. The 19-story, 351-unit apartment building will be located within The Central, a 27-acre mixed-use development near the Knox/Henderson neighborhood north of downtown Dallas.
Sustainability | Feb 9, 2023
New guide for planning, designing, and operating onsite water reuse systems
The Pacific Institute, a global nonpartisan water think tank, has released guidance for developers to plan, design, and operate onsite water reuse systems. The Guide for Developing Onsite Water Systems to Support Regional Water Resilience advances circular, localized approaches to managing water that reduce a site’s water footprint, improve its resilience to water shortage or other disruptions, and provide benefits for local communities and regional water systems.
