flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Resistance to Toronto’s ‘smart city’ reveals pitfalls of such ambitious projects

Codes and Standards

Resistance to Toronto’s ‘smart city’ reveals pitfalls of such ambitious projects

Concerns over data privacy, governance, feasibility prompt criticism.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | November 14, 2019

Courtesy Pixabay

Two years ago, a plan to create a smart city project along Toronto’s waterfront was unveiled with great fanfare.

Since then, the proposal, spearheaded by Sidewalk Labs, a subsidiary of Alphabet (Google’s parent company) has prompted extensive public criticism and a lawsuit by the Canadian Civil Liberties Association over data privacy and misuse concerns. The ambitious project was conceived as a showcase for the latest smart city technologies.

The project is to be centered on sustainable and safe transportation systems, and efficient and affordable housing. Technology such as “adaptive traffic lights” would prioritize cyclists and pedestrians and study the possibility of autonomous transit options. Innovative building materials and new occupancy models, like “co-housing”, would offer green, reasonably-priced housing.

With sensors tracking people and vehicles sprinkled throughout the development, privacy rights advocates are concerned that the data could be used for surveillance and discourage people to exercise free speech rights. It didn’t help that at public hearings Sidewalk Labs seemed unable to spell out where this data would be stored and how it would be used.

The company also presented a greatly expanded scope of the proposal from the original 12 acres to a 190-acre area at a public meeting, perhaps misreading the intent of the agreement with the city. These issues have caused delays to the project, but Waterfront Toronto, the city group overseeing it, recently voted to go forward with the 12-acre development.

Other smart city projects around the globe, including in South Korea and India, have been also been plagued by delays and controversies. These challenges indicate that making cities smarter will not be easy.

Related Stories

| Mar 22, 2012

Bill would reintroduce “opt-out” provision in lead paint law

The Lead Exposure Reduction Amendments Act of 2012 (S2148) would restore the "Opt-Out" provision removed from the Environmental Protection Agency's Lead Renovate, Repair and Painting (LRRP) rule in April 2010.

| Mar 15, 2012

New Florida building code establishes flood and storm surge provisions

The new 2010 code establishes minimum design and construction requirements to protect buildings from wind, rain, floods, and storm surges.

| Mar 15, 2012

Illinois city rejects international code due to home sprinkler requirement

Macomb, Illinois aldermen voted to recommend that the city not adopt 2012 international building and residential code standards requiring the installation of overhead sprinkler systems in newly constructed one-family and two-family homes.

| Mar 15, 2012

Tenant advocates propose licensing landlords in New York City

With thousands of New York City rental units posing potential dangers to tenants, city advocates are proposing measures to make landlords improve building safety.

| Mar 15, 2012

Construction industry a big winner in federal small disadvantaged business procurement

Last year, only 5% of federal contract dollars went to small disadvantaged businesses. Construction and facilities support firms were the biggest beneficiaries.

| Mar 15, 2012

ANSI approves new fall protection standards

The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) has approved two American Society of Safety Engineers' (ASSE) standards addressing fall protection.

| Mar 8, 2012

Engineering innovation provides new option for meeting seismic codes in skyscrapers

Two University of Toronto engineers have developed “viscoelastic-energy-dissipating dampers” to replace many of the heavy concrete beams used in tall structures.

| Mar 8, 2012

CSI webinar on building code compliance March 22

A March 22 webinar will provide an overview of a 28-step process during the design of a building to ensure compliance with building codes.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021