Planners are often asked to test a facilities concept, define how much space it will take, and determine how much it will cost to complete. These questions are useful in the early concept phase of a project, but the basis for planning is missing; what am I solving for, and how does this potential “bricks and mortar” solution meet a defined service, market, or strategic need of the organization? It’s all about scoping the right concept before getting too far down the facility planning phase.
Defining and documenting project scope (the project intention, goal, or purpose) at the outset and controlling scope throughout the planning and delivery process is essential to ensuring the project vision becomes reality.
Ask yourself:
● What strategies and goals are we trying to achieve?
● What is the scope of the envisioned project and how was it defined?
Clearly defining the project, then articulating the scope and rationale to the team is paramount prior to launch. Scope typically relates to:
● Meeting the demands of the organization’s patients (service area)
● Cultivating a new or expanded service line opportunity
● Helping to improve throughput and operations
● Fixing an infrastructure or standard-of-care issue
● Scope control/communicating clear scope of work
● Attaining successful project definition
Rushing into design and construction without clearly defining the project scope can lead to project delay and frustration later in the process. If each team member cannot clearly articulate the scope of the project, you should stop and get everyone on the same page. Establish measurable project goals early to stay on track.
Scope Definition and Documentation
A facility project is a tactical element of a strategic plan or the output of business plan; this plan is built on the mission, vision, and goals of the organization. An organization’s strategic plan should include:
● Mission and vision identification
● SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats)
● Internal and external environmental analysis
● Identification of gaps between mission/vision and internal/external needs
● Service needs identification
● Market-based needs and capacity analysis
● Strategic financial analysis
● Measurable strategic goals
● Tactics to meet the strategic goals of the organization
The needs identified in a strategic plan or focused business plan drive the tactical need for a project—not the other way around. A well-conceived scope guides facilities master planning and the detailed programming and design phases of a project. The scope of the project also acts as the base to define the project budget. Scope and budget are inextricably linked and need to be constantly checked against each other. It’s imperative that the two balance relative to a complete financial analysis of the project. If the project doesn’t “pencil” from a return-on-investment (ROI) perspective, then you’ll need to adjust scope and budget to get the project in line financially and still meet the market and service delivery goals of the organization.
If you conduct these analyses early, you have a better chance of making less costing changes if needed. As you move through the project delivery process, the ability to easily make changes decreases, and the cost of changes increases. Therefore, it’s important to appropriately define the scope, test it against the budget, and communicate and document it at the project outset.
Scope Control
Once scope is defined and clearly communicated to the project delivery team, it must be managed. Use scope control tools developed during the early planning phases and during each subsequent planning and design phase (master planning, space planning, schematic design, design development, and construction documents) to avoid scope creep. Scope creep refers to uncontrolled changes in a project’s defined scope. Typically, scope increases consist of new services, new features, or additional room elements without corresponding strategic or market demand justification. Avoid scope creep early by:
● Plan based on defined and justified needs rather than articulated wants
● Encourage stakeholder participation and plan based on facts and analysis to ensure buy-in from all parties
● Eliminate “pet” projects or elements with no financial strategic justification; this is “wish-casting” instead of “forecasting” and usually results in wasted finite resources at the expense of needed projects
● Clearly communicate scope to all key constituents and members of the project delivery team before embarking on detailed planning, design, and construction
● Track scope early and continue to track throughout the life of the project
Remember, you don’t need to eliminate scope changes all together. Sound strategic logic and rapidly changing market dynamics may dictate appropriate (controlled) changes to scope that are justified. Strong scope controls will identify acceptable variances and appropriately jump-start conversations as to the “why” for the changes.
Scope increases may require additional resources (e.g. staffing, space, equipment, capital costs, time, and operational costs) which must be justified or they could potentially put the project at risk. A few thousand square feet of scope creep could add millions to your total project cost, create delays if changed late in the design process, and cause a few headaches along the way. Allowing scope creep without correlating demand and revenue may require additional staffing resources, equipment, and furnishings, and carries the long-term operational cost without the requisite return on investment.
Interestingly scope can shrink too. Cutting revenue producing scope to make budget will have downward impact on potential ROI, the ability to meet service demand, and ability to offer services and recruit new staff. If a department is downsized to allow another area to grow and still remain within budget, make sure the downsized department is not rendered dysfunctional. If this happens, you may pay once the facility is operational.
There is great risk and cost to unfettered scope creep and a poorly defined project; therefore, proper planning and controls must be in place to prevent your project from being derailed. Items to consider:
● Thoroughly understand the project vision and involve all stakeholders in defining and documenting the project scope
● Utilize tools to monitor and control scope, and track the departmental “units” (e.g. number of rooms) and departmental space
● Expect changes; develop processes and criteria to evaluate proposed scope changes and to decide which changes are necessary to fulfill the intended vision
Start with acutely defining and documenting scope on the front end of the project. Control scope throughout the process to position yourself to control your project, instead of your project controlling you.
If you build it, will they come?
In summary, too often healthcare executives employ an “If you build it, they will come” mentality to a project. Sure, a new facility or space frequently have a halo effect and activity may spike initially. But if the services aren’t what the patient, caregivers, and physicians require, then they will stop coming. The analyses conducted in the planning phase will help to accurately define project scope; meet the strategic, market, and financial goals of leadership; and meet the needs of the healthcare organization’s community.
Related Stories
| Jul 28, 2014
LEO A DALY hires Peter Yakowicz to oversee VA projects
New hire will work with healthcare and federal market sectors on programs specifically for the Department of Veterans Affairs.
| Jul 23, 2014
Holistic care model, regulatory changes make outpatient facilities a high priority [2014 Giants 300 Report]
With the Affordable Care Act still in its infancy, Building Teams are seeing reverberations in the investment decisions of healthcare providers, including new ideas about the types of buildings they are asked to create.
| Jul 23, 2014
Top Healthcare Sector Construction Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]
Turner, McCarthy, and Skanska USA top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest healthcare contractors and construction management firms in the U.S.
| Jul 23, 2014
Top Healthcare Sector Engineering Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]
AECOM, Jacobs, and URS Corp. top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest healthcare engineering and engineering/architecture firms in the U.S.
| Jul 23, 2014
Top Healthcare Sector Architecture Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]
HDR, Stantec, and HKS top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest healthcare architecture and architecture/engineering firms in the U.S.
| Jul 23, 2014
Architecture Billings Index up nearly a point in June
AIA reported the June ABI score was 53.5, up from a mark of 52.6 in May.
| Jul 21, 2014
Economists ponder uneven recovery, weigh benefits of big infrastructure [2014 Giants 300 Report]
According to expert forecasters, multifamily projects, the Panama Canal expansion, and the petroleum industry’s “shale gale” could be saving graces for commercial AEC firms seeking growth opportunities in an economy that’s provided its share of recent disappointments.
| Jul 20, 2014
IPD contract saves time and money for cancer center [2014 Building Team Awards]
Partners share the risk and reward of extreme collaboration on this LEED Silver project, which relies heavily on Lean principles.
| Jul 18, 2014
Contractors warm up to new technologies, invent new management schemes [2014 Giants 300 Report]
“UAV.” “LATISTA.” “CMST.” If BD+C Giants 300 contractors have anything to say about it, these new terms may someday be as well known as “BIM” or “LEED.” Here’s a sampling of what Giant GCs and CMs are doing by way of technological and managerial innovation.
| Jul 18, 2014
Top Construction Management Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]
Jacobs, Barton Malow, Hill International top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest construction management and project management firms in the United States.