flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

A survey challenges the efficacy of decentralized nurses station design

Healthcare Facilities

A survey challenges the efficacy of decentralized nurses station design

The Institute of Health + Wellness Design at the University of Kansas raised questions after reviewing a hospital’s renovated orthopedic unit.


By John Caulfield, Senior Editor | January 19, 2017

Decentralized nurses stations are becoming more common in hospitals looking to improve their patient satisfaction scores. But a University of Kansas research team wonders whether decentralization might be hampering nurses' collaboration. Image: University of Kansas

When evidence-based design collides with conventional wisdom, the outcome will sometimes be disruptive.

Take, for example, the generally accepted advantages in patient care and observation related to decentralizing nurses’ stations in hospitals, which is becoming standard practice for healthcare clients and their AEC partners.

A recent evaluation of a renovated Missouri hospital, conducted by University of Kansas faculty members, raised questions about the impact of decentralization on patient satisfaction and the communication among nursing teams within the facility.

The St. Louis-based architectural firm Lawrence Group retained the Institute for Health + Wellness Design (IHWD) at KU’s School of Architecture, Design, and Planning to provide a third-party review of the firm’s 2014 remodeling of the orthopedic unit at SSM St. Mary’s Hospital in Jefferson City. That healthcare system was about to embark on an expansion of its St. Joseph Hospital West in Lake St. Louis.

Lawrence Group is an affiliate member of IHWD.

The Institute assessed the unit using an evidence-based design checklist developed by the nonprofit Center for Health Design in California. Its survey included a “space syntax” evaluation that generated a heat map, which showed how the unit’s layout might affect patient satisfaction.

“We wanted to see does moving into a new facility improve patient satisfaction scores, which is one of the most important things for hospital owners today,” said Hui Cai, Assistant Professor at KU, who with Professor Kent Spreckelmeyer and Frank Zilm, IHWD’s chairman, presented findings from the Institute’s nursing unit study at the Healthcare Design Conference 2016 in Houston last November.

The study found, perhaps not surprisingly, that the facility itself showed “statistically significant increase[s]” in scores after the renovation. But patient-quality scores mostly stayed the same, and one score—nurses’ responses to patient calls—actually dropped slightly.

The Institute hypothesizes that decentralization was the culprit, due to the physical distance and visual disconnection of decentralized nursing unit design, which necessitates that nurses must move farther to get from station to station. The Institute suggests these distances might be an impediment to interaction among nurses that might also delay responses to patients.

“This design trend needs to be further investigated before it is accepted as standard for every hospital,” said Cai. “We have to see how to modify the design to achieve balance between shorter walking distance, better patient surveillance and better staff communication and collaboration.”

This is one of the first research studies to link decentralized nurse station design with organizational performance and patient outcomes. The Institute has conducted a second phase of study to evaluate further the degree to which decentralized design affects nurses’ teamwork and patients’ perception of care. In late 2017, IHWD plans to present and publish the results of this study, which included a second hospital, the University Medical Center of Princeton at Plainsboro, N.J.

Related Stories

Giants 400 | Jan 23, 2024

Top 70 Medical Office Building Construction Firms for 2023

PCL Construction Enterprises, Swinerton, Skanska USA, Clark Group, and Hensel Phelps top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest medical office building general contractors and construction management (CM) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Jan 23, 2024

Top 50 Medical Office Building Engineering Firms for 2023

Jacobs, Salas O'Brien, KPFF Consulting Engineers, IMEG, and Kimley-Horn head BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest medical office building engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report.  

Giants 400 | Jan 23, 2024

Top 110 Medical Office Building Architecture Firms for 2023

SmithGroup, CannonDesign, E4H Environments for Health Architecture, and Perkins Eastman top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest medical office building architecture and architecture engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Jan 22, 2024

Top 100 Outpatient Facility Architecture Firms for 2023

HDR, CannonDesign, Stantec, Perkins&Will, and ZGF top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest outpatient facility architecture and architecture engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report. Note: This ranking includes design revenue for work related to outpatient medical buildings, including cancer centers, heart centers, urgent care facilities, and other medical centers.

Giants 400 | Jan 22, 2024

Top 40 Outpatient Facility Engineering Firms for 2023

Jacobs, IMEG, TLC Engineering Solutions, KPFF Consulting Engineers, and Syska Hennessy Group head BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest outpatient facility engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report. Note: This ranking includes design revenue for work related to outpatient medical buildings, including cancer centers, heart centers, urgent care facilities, and other medical centers.

Giants 400 | Jan 22, 2024

Top 60 Outpatient Facility Construction Firms for 2023

DPR Construction, PCL Construction Enterprises, The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company, Skanska USA, and Power Construction top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest outpatient facility general contractors and construction management (CM) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report. Note: This ranking includes construction revenue for work related to outpatient medical buildings, including cancer centers, heart centers, urgent care facilities, and other medical centers.

Sponsored | BD+C University Course | Jan 17, 2024

Waterproofing deep foundations for new construction

This continuing education course, by Walter P Moore's Amos Chan, P.E., BECxP, CxA+BE, covers design considerations for below-grade waterproofing for new construction, the types of below-grade systems available, and specific concerns associated with waterproofing deep foundations.

Giants 400 | Jan 15, 2024

Top 90 Hospital Facility Construction Firms for 2023

Turner Construction, Brasfield & Gorrie, JE Dunn Construction, McCarthy Holdings, and STO Building Group top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest hospital facility general contractors and construction management (CM) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Jan 15, 2024

Top 80 Hospital Facility Engineering Firms for 2023

Jacobs, WSP, BR+A, IMEG, and AECOM head BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest hospital facility engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021