| Rank | Company | 2012 Healthcare Revenue ($) |
| 1 | AECOM Technology Corp. | $180,210,000 |
| 2 | Jacobs Engineering Group | $77,100,000 |
| 3 | URS Corp. | $43,327,332 |
| 4 | Smith Seckman Reid | $40,105,600 |
| 5 | KPFF Consulting Engineers | $30,000,000 |
| 6 | Affiliated Engineers | $28,217,000 |
| 7 | TTG | $24,719,905 |
| 8 | Parsons Brinckerhoff | $22,700,000 |
| 9 | Dewberry | $21,226,702 |
| 10 | Allen & Shariff | $20,300,000 |
| 11 | Bard, Rao + Athanas Consulting Engineers | $19,000,000 |
| 12 | KJWW Engineering Consultants | $18,937,680 |
| 13 | Mazzetti | $18,293,579 |
| 14 | Degenkolb Engineers | $18,070,782 |
| 15 | CCRD Partners | $18,000,000 |
| 16 | Burns & McDonnell | $16,375,000 |
| 17 | TLC Engineering for Architecture | $13,500,933 |
| 18 | Syska Hennessy Group | $11,495,282 |
| 19 | AKF Group | $10,770,000 |
| 20 | Arup | $9,244,250 |
| 21 | Shive-Hattery | $8,381,840 |
| 22 | Heapy Engineering | $8,159,633 |
| 23 | Zak Companies | $7,640,496 |
| 24 | M-E Engineers | $7,200,000 |
| 24 | RMF Engineering Design | $7,200,000 |
| 26 | Thornton Tomasetti | $6,858,953 |
| 27 | Sparling | $6,768,165 |
| 28 | Buro Happold Consulting Engineers | $6,520,000 |
| 29 | Rolf Jensen & Associates | $6,400,000 |
| 30 | Walter P Moore | $6,232,472 |
| 31 | Michael Baker Jr. | $6,200,000 |
| 32 | SSOE Group | $6,192,909 |
| 33 | Simpson Gumpertz & Heger | $5,700,000 |
| 34 | M/E Engineering | $5,671,750 |
| 35 | Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates | $5,390,000 |
| 36 | Dunham Associates | $5,000,000 |
| 37 | Vanderweil Engineers | $4,846,600 |
| 38 | Interface Engineering | $4,633,068 |
| 39 | RDK Engineers | $4,572,000 |
| 40 | Karpinski Engineering | $4,438,224 |
| 41 | Clark Nexsen | $4,167,051 |
| 42 | Peter Basso Associates | $4,066,000 |
| 43 | Aon Fire Protection Engineering | $4,000,728 |
| 44 | H.F. Lenz | $3,983,000 |
| 45 | Newcomb & Boyd | $3,942,400 |
| 46 | Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers | $3,879,844 |
| 47 | STV | $3,735,000 |
| 48 | Walker Parking Consultants | $3,719,693 |
| 49 | Science Applications International Corp. | $3,621,708 |
| 50 | Eaton Energy Solutions | $3,502,239 |
| 51 | KCI Technologies | $3,500,000 |
| 52 | Coffman Engineers | $3,350,000 |
| 53 | Spectrum Engineers | $3,338,950 |
| 54 | Glumac | $3,296,000 |
| 55 | WSP USA | $2,411,684 |
| 56 | CJL Engineering | $2,390,686 |
| 57 | Environmental Systems Design | $2,383,822 |
| 58 | KLH Engineers | $2,100,000 |
| 59 | Rist-Frost-Shumway Engineering | $2,000,000 |
| 60 | Apogee Consulting Group | $1,582,000 |
| 61 | Ross & Baruzzini | $1,505,511 |
| 62 | Henderson Engineers | $1,469,261 |
| 63 | Brinjac Engineering | $1,367,836 |
| 64 | GRAEF | $1,335,473 |
| 65 | ThermalTech Engineering | $1,300,000 |
| 66 | Haynes Whaley Associates | $1,226,927 |
| 67 | Bergmann Associates | $1,177,000 |
| 68 | Wick Fisher White | $1,137,773 |
| 69 | Magnusson Klemencic Associates | $1,053,699 |
| 70 | Bala Consulting Engineers | $850,000 |
| 71 | OLA Consulting Engineers | $750,000 |
| 72 | CTLGroup | $700,000 |
| 72 | French & Parrello Associates | $700,000 |
| 74 | Primera Engineers | $620,000 |
| 75 | FBA Engineering | $400,000 |
| 76 | Joseph R. Loring & Associates | $280,000 |
| 77 | G&W Engineering | $232,000 |
| 78 | Wallace Engineering | $225,000 |
| 79 | Stanley Consultants | $219,880 |
| 80 | Davis, Bowen & Friedel | $187,632 |
| 81 | Paulus, Sokolowski and Sartor | $150,000 |
| 82 | P2S Engineering | $76,079 |
| 83 | Total Building Commissioning | $46,144 |
| 84 | Kamm Consulting | $21,025 |
| 85 | Guernsey | $11,668 |
Read the Healthcare Giants article
Read BD+C's full Giants 300 Report
Related Stories
Engineers | Nov 10, 2022
U.S. engineering firms cash in on a volatile, expanding market
New practices and markets drive growth for U.S. engineering and engineering-architecture firms. And firms are getting serious about reducing projects’ carbon footprint.
Architects | Nov 10, 2022
What’s new at 173 architecture firms for 2022
More than 295 U.S. architecture and architecture-engineering (AE) firms participated in BD+C's 2022 Giants 400 survey. As part of the Giants survey process, participating firms are asked to describe their most impactful firm innovations and noteworthy company moves in the past 12 months. Here is a collection of the most compelling business and project innovations and business moves from the 2022 Architecture Giants.
Giants 400 | Nov 9, 2022
Top 30 Data Center Architecture + AE Firms for 2022
HDR, Corgan, Sheehan Nagle Hartray Architects, and Gensler top the ranking of the nation's largest data center architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms for 2022, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Nov 8, 2022
Top 110 Sports Facility Architecture and AE Firms for 2022
Populous, HOK, Gensler, and Perkins and Will top the ranking of the nation's largest sports facility architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms for 2022, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Industry Research | Nov 8, 2022
U.S. metros take the lead in decarbonizing their built environments
A new JLL report evaluates the goals and actions of 18 cities.
Hotel Facilities | Nov 8, 2022
6 hotel design trends for 2022-2023
Personalization of the hotel guest experience shapes new construction and renovation, say architects and construction experts in this sector.
Green | Nov 8, 2022
USGBC and IWBI will develop dual certification pathways for LEED and WELL
The U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) and the International WELL Building Institute (IWBI) will expand their strategic partnership to develop dual certification pathways for LEED and WELL.
Reconstruction & Renovation | Nov 8, 2022
Renovation work outpaces new construction for first time in two decades
Renovations of older buildings in U.S. cities recently hit a record high as reflected in architecture firm billings, according to the American Institute of Architects (AIA).
Sponsored | Steel Buildings | Nov 7, 2022
Steel structures offer faster path to climate benefits
Faster delivery of buildings isn’t always associated with sustainability benefits or long-term value, but things are changing. An instructive case is in the development of steel structures that not only allow speedier erection times, but also can reduce embodied carbon and create durable, highly resilient building approaches.
Building Team | Nov 7, 2022
U.S. commercial buildings decreased energy use intensity from 2012 to 2018
The recently released 2018 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS) by the U.S. Energy Information Administration found that the total floorspace in commercial buildings has increased but energy consumption has not, compared with the last survey analyzing the landscape in 2012.
