flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Top K-12 School Sector Engineering Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]

Top K-12 School Sector Engineering Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]

AECOM, URS, STV top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest K-12 school sector engineering and engineering/architecture firms in the U.S.


By BD+C Staff | July 22, 2013
Rank Company 2012 K-12 Revenue ($)
1 AECOM Technology Corp. $100,150,000
2 URS Corp. $55,927,778
3 STV $45,937,000
4 Jacobs Engineering Group $36,550,000
5 Parsons Brinckerhoff $19,100,000
6 TTG $9,985,300
7 Shive-Hattery $7,379,425
8 BRPH $4,900,000
9 KCI Technologies $4,200,000
10 Dewberry $3,852,971
11 KJWW Engineering Consultants $3,643,844
12 Thornton Tomasetti $3,589,317
13 Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates $3,570,000
14 Joseph R. Loring & Associates $3,500,000
15 KPFF Consulting Engineers $3,000,000
16 M/E Engineering $2,779,150
17 Interface Engineering $2,745,564
18 Simpson Gumpertz & Heger $2,700,000
19 CJL Engineering $2,507,621
20 Rist-Frost-Shumway Engineering $2,500,000
21 FBA Engineering $2,405,000
22 Allen & Shariff $2,200,000
23 Coffman Engineers $2,140,000
24 Heapy Engineering $2,086,975
25 Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers $2,024,266
26 RDK Engineers $1,975,000
27 AKF Group $1,576,000
28 Vanderweil Engineers $1,553,500
29 French & Parrello Associates $1,500,000
30 SSOE Group $1,473,611
31 Glumac $1,404,000
32 Peter Basso Associates $1,400,000
33 Wallace Engineering $1,350,000
34 Henderson Engineers $1,118,069
35 Brinjac Engineering $1,080,748
36 Clark Nexsen $1,063,791
37 G&W Engineering $1,000,000
37 KLH Engineers $1,000,000
37 WSP USA $1,000,000
40 TLC Engineering for Architecture $933,884
41 H.F. Lenz $847,000
42 Davis, Bowen & Friedel $833,642
43 Sparling $785,356
44 Primera Engineers $748,000
45 M-E Engineers $700,000
46 Environmental Systems Design $610,185
47 Paulus, Sokolowski and Sartor $500,000
48 RMF Engineering Design $500,000
49 OLA Consulting Engineers $400,000
50 Rolf Jensen & Associates $400,000
51 Karpinski Engineering $379,369
52 Bala Consulting Engineers $350,000
53 Eaton Energy Solutions $312,320
54 Wick Fisher White $300,697
55 Apogee Consulting Group $278,000
56 Arup $251,475
57 Aon Fire Protection Engineering $200,000
57 GHT Limited $200,000
59 Mazzetti $182,262
60 Dunham Associates $150,000
61 GRW $135,860
62 Magnusson Klemencic Associates $109,780
63 Science Applications International Corp. $109,282
64 Barge, Waggoner, Sumner and Cannon $100,000
64 CTLGroup $100,000
66 Degenkolb Engineers $97,850
67 P2S Engineering $86,100
68 Spectrum Engineers $83,820
69 Affiliated Engineers $55,000
70 Kamm Consulting $45,861
71 Newcomb & Boyd $42,814
72 Haynes Whaley Associates $34,139
73 Walter P Moore $29,068

 

Back to the K-12 School Giants article

 

Read BD+C's full Giants 300 Report

Related Stories

| Apr 12, 2011

American Institute of Architects announces Guide for Sustainable Projects

AIA Guide for Sustainable Projects to provide design and construction industries with roadmap for working on sustainable projects.

| Apr 11, 2011

Wind turbines to generate power for new UNT football stadium

The University of North Texas has received a $2 million grant from the State Energy Conservation Office to install three wind turbines that will feed the electrical grid and provide power to UNT’s new football stadium. 

| Apr 8, 2011

SHW Group appoints Marjorie K. Simmons as CEO

Chairman of the Board Marjorie K. Simmons assumes CEO position, making SHW Group the only firm in the AIA Large Firm Roundtable to appoint a woman to this leadership position

| Apr 5, 2011

Zaha Hadid’s civic center design divides California city

Architect Zaha Hadid  is in high demand these days, designing projects in Hong Kong, Milan, and Seoul, not to mention the London Aquatics Center, the swimming arena for the 2012 Olympics. But one of the firm’s smaller clients, the city of Elk Grove, Calif., recently conjured far different kinds of aquatic life when members of the City Council and the public chose words like “squid,” “octopus,” and “starfish” to describe the latest renderings for a proposed civic center.

| Apr 5, 2011

Are architects falling behind on BIM?

A study by the National Building Specification arm of RIBA Enterprises showed that 43% of architects and others in the industry had still not heard of BIM, let alone started using it. It also found that of the 13% of respondents who were using BIM only a third thought they would be using it for most of their projects in a year’s time.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Urban Planning

Bridging the gap: How early architect involvement can revolutionize a city’s capital improvement plans

Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs) typically span three to five years and outline future city projects and their costs. While they set the stage, the design and construction of these projects often extend beyond the CIP window, leading to a disconnect between the initial budget and evolving project scope. This can result in financial shortfalls, forcing cities to cut back on critical project features.



Libraries

Reasons to reinvent the Midcentury academic library

DLR Group's Interior Design Leader Gretchen Holy, Assoc. IIDA, shares the idea that a designer's responsibility to embrace a library’s history, respect its past, and create an environment that will serve student populations for the next 100 years.

halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021