The healthcare sector faces grave financial uncertainties, even with the June 28 Supreme Court decision upholding the Affordable Care Act. To help us sort out the factors impacting this lucrative segment, we turned to Philip Tobey, a Fellow of both the AIA and the American College of Healthcare Architects and Senior Vice President with SmithGroupJJR.
“Health industry providers legitimately expect significant efficiencies and lower costs for design and construction services, to go along with the economies that they themselves face with tighter and value-based reimbursement terms under health reform,” says Tobey, a member of Building Design+Construction’s Editorial Board.
In other words, AEC firms are going to have to share some of their healthcare clients’ pain. The drive for greater operational efficiency and lower cost in healthcare will be unrelenting, with bundled payments and shared savings models in lieu of traditional fee-for-service reimbursement forcing healthcare providers to eliminate wasteful practices.
Tobey sees three major trends emerging: 1) growing emphasis on ambulatory care, 2) medical systems integration, and 3) the “bundling/unbundling” of services.
SCROLL DOWN FOR GIANTS 300 TOP 25 AEC HEALTHCARE FIRM RANKINGS
1. PUSHING AMBULATORY CARE FACILITIES OUT
“The trend to push services out of the hospital into ambulatory settings will only intensify,” says Tobey. He notes, however, that there will be an “overwhelming need” to expand the front end of delivery—primary care, urgent care, and emergency departments—and to rationalize procedural and imaging resource capacity. At the same time, freestanding surgery and imaging centers may not be as prevalent in the future, and may need to be consolidated into larger hospital centers.
“Hospitals are not going away,” says Tobey, even though inpatient volumes are predicted to fall 5%, vs. 30% growth in outpatient volume. The sheer increased volume of patients, especially as baby boomers age, will inevitably drive up acute-care admissions. In the face of these seemingly countervailing trends, says Tobey, “The need to renovate outdated or obsolete facilities will be a strong driver in the healthcare business.”
2. INTEGRATING MEDICAL SYSTEMS MORE TIGHTLY
Tobey says the need for greater efficiency and ever-higher quality of care are not new goals for medical care or medical design, but hospital systems are being encouraged further by healthcare reform to streamline processes, with more mergers, acquisitions, and hospital-physician staff integrations on the horizon. “The industry’s even been talking about including services like long-term care and home care into this integrated approach,” he says.
Although there will always be a need for acute-care hospitals, Tobey sees a possible shift toward more community-based portals. As health systems continue to integrate, they will rely more and more on treatment venues outside the hospital to provide patients with coordinated preventive care and treatment for chronic conditions.
The IT component of hospital systems is already a natural for systems integration. “Providing the right information where it’s needed is essential for clinical care,” says Tobey, who foresees greater implementation of electronic medical records.
Are hospitals ready for lean?
“Everybody’s talking about it, but many hospital owners are wary of taking on lean,” says SmithGroupJJR’s Phil Tobey, FAIA, FACHA, whose firm is on the team for Sutter Health’s California Pacific Medical Center in San Francisco, the largest lean project in the U.S. “You have Sutter, which is totally lean, then you have clients who tell us not even to mention the word,” he says. “Others are applying the basic principles of lean construction without carrying the heavy weight of all that lean entails.”
Applying Lean/Six Sigma principles to healthcare, says Jeffrey C. Stouffer, AIA, a Principal with HKS, would result in “measurable outcomes and even risk sharing as part of the design and construction process” by eliminating unnecessary waste in construction and operations and increasing staff efficiency and safety, while reducing energy and staff costs for the hospital.
3. UNBUNDLING/BUNDLING OF HEALTHCARE SERVICES
Healthcare providers are “decanting” non-core functions—services like pharmacy, lab support, materials handling, and environmental management—from the mother ship into cheaper B-occupancy buildings. “Anything soft, anything that’s not high-tech, is being taken out,” says Tobey. “That’s the unbundling.”
However, once the unbundling of less-intense services has been accomplished, says Tobey, some hospital systems are opting to bundle the remaining hospital space, by placing beds back on top of the structure’s base diagnostic and support block, instead of having the traditional diagnostic/support chassis with attached nursing wings.
“You unbundle and decant the support services, then take the remaining high-intensity hospital base and put the beds on top,” says Tobey. A recent study for a 100-bed community hospital found that following such a scheme would result in 39% savings in construction costs per bed. +
TOP 25 HEALTHCARE SECTOR ARCHITECTURE FIRMS
Rank | Company | 2011 Healthcare Revenue ($) |
1 | HDR Architecture | 205,200,000 |
2 | HKS | 124,736,964 |
3 | Perkins+Will | 122,895,589 |
4 | Cannon Design | 121,000,000 |
5 | NBBJ | 116,401,000 |
6 | HOK | 102,695,248 |
7 | SmithGroupJJR | 74,600,000 |
8 | RTKL Associates | 68,421,405 |
9 | Perkins Eastman | 63,700,000 |
10 | Hammel, Green and Abrahamson | 61,900,000 |
11 | ZGF Architects | 54,338,355 |
12 | Heery International | 48,583,000 |
13 | HMC Architects | 42,715,899 |
14 | PageSoutherlandPage | 38,670,000 |
15 | IBI Group | 37,349,554 |
16 | Skidmore, Owings & Merrill | 33,950,000 |
17 | FKP Architects | 33,947,200 |
18 | Gresham, Smith and Partners | 32,876,981 |
19 | FreemanWhite | 28,500,000 |
20 | RBB Architects | 28,500,000 |
21 | LEO A DALY | 26,900,325 |
22 | BSA LifeStructures | 26,323,759 |
23 | EwingCole | 24,000,000 |
24 | KMD Architects | 20,161,678 |
25 | Ennead Architects | 19,875,000 |
TOP 25 HEALTHCARE SECTOR ENGINEERING FIRMS
Rank | Company | 2011 Healthcare Revenue ($) |
1 | AECOM Technology Corp. | 314,000,000 |
2 | Stantec | 109,980,000 |
3 | URS Corp. | 41,298,918 |
4 | Smith Seckman Reid | 38,300,000 |
5 | Jacobs | 32,950,000 |
6 | Parsons Brinckerhoff | 30,600,000 |
7 | KPFF Consulting Engineers | 28,000,000 |
8 | TTG|TMAD TAYLOR & GAINES | 27,677,900 |
9 | Mazzetti Nash Lipsey Burch | 24,988,296 |
10 | Degenkolb Engineers | 22,454,591 |
11 | Allen & Shariff | 21,577,769 |
12 | Bard, Rao + Athanas Consulting Engineers | 18,000,000 |
13 | ccrd partners | 17,100,000 |
14 | Atkins North America | 16,173,240 |
15 | AKF Group | 15,200,000 |
16 | KJWW Engineering Consultants | 14,607,369 |
17 | Syska Hennessy Group | 14,462,238 |
18 | Zak Companies | 13,882,705 |
19 | TLC Engineering for Architecture | 13,874,283 |
20 | Dewberry | 10,613,564 |
21 | Thornton Tomasetti | 9,860,000 |
22 | Sparling | 9,658,825 |
23 | Walter P Moore | 7,718,326 |
24 | M/E Engineering | 7,700,000 |
25 | Rutherford & Chekene | 7,650,000 |
TOP 25 HEALTHCARE SECTOR CONSTRUCTION FIRMS
Rank | Company | 2011 Healthcare Revenue ($) |
1 | Turner Corporation, The | 1,807,050,000 |
2 | McCarthy Holdings | 1,231,000,000 |
3 | Gilbane Building Co. | 1,091,777,000 |
4 | Clark Group | 1,067,411,678 |
5 | PCL Construction Enterprises | 869,130,091 |
6 | Brasfield & Gorrie | 833,522,003 |
7 | Skanska USA | 724,418,042 |
8 | JE Dunn Construction | 636,206,095 |
9 | Robins & Morton | 599,073,000 |
10 | DPR Construction | 588,199,172 |
11 | Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., The | 464,779,240 |
12 | Mortenson | 455,620,000 |
13 | Lend Lease | 434,626,482 |
14 | Hensel Phelps Construction | 425,760,000 |
15 | Suffolk Construction | 420,343,563 |
16 | Pepper Construction Group | 415,064,000 |
17 | Tutor Perini Corp. | 409,583,000 |
18 | Balfour Beatty US | 389,253,907 |
19 | Hunt Construction Group | 369,500,000 |
20 | Hoar Construction | 313,937,000 |
21 | Flintco | 291,400,000 |
22 | Layton Construction | 287,300,000 |
23 | HBE Corp. | 279,200,000 |
24 | Power Construction | 275,000,000 |
25 | Swinerton | 274,627,440 |
Related Stories
Building Technology | Mar 8, 2019
What is your firm's innovation 'hit rate'?
As firms begin to adopt the practices and mindset of Silicon Valley tech and advanced manufacturing, it’s fair to ask: Are all of these innovation projects and initiatives working?
Architects | Mar 7, 2019
HED, Integrated Design Group to merge firms
ID has a strong reputation for data center design with locations in Boston in Dallas.
Architects | Mar 5, 2019
Arata Isozaki named 2019 Pritzker Architecture Prize Laureate
The Japanese architect, city planner, and theorist is known for his deep commitment to the “art of space” and transnational methodology.
Education Facilities | Feb 25, 2019
Fallingwater Institute’s summer residency programs have a new educational hub
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson designed the project.
Architects | Feb 14, 2019
Amazon will not build HQ2 in New York City
The tech giant walks away from a deal, succumbing to opposition over huge tax breaks.
Architects | Feb 12, 2019
The basics of building commissioning
As building system technology increases in complexity and sustainability remains at the forefront of design, the need for commissioning continues to rise. This is the first post in our series examining the basics, benefits and boundaries of building commissioning.
Architects | Jan 28, 2019
9 tech trends to track in 2019
Innovations in voice recognition, cognitive neuroscience, and biometrics are among the trending tech topics for 2019, according to CallisonRTKL's Kristin Tilley.
AEC Tech | Jan 9, 2019
Our robotic future: Assessing AI's impact on the AEC profession and the built environment
This is the first in a series by Lance Hosey, FAIA, on how automation is disrupting design and construction.
Architects | Dec 17, 2018
New toolkit helps architect achieve high-performance buildings
Architects can download a copy of the toolkit online.
Architects | Dec 13, 2018
Social media synergy: Revving up your AEC firm’s content engine
Design firms know that just having a website and a blog aren’t enough, but social media complicates how they communicate.