The healthcare sector faces grave financial uncertainties, even with the June 28 Supreme Court decision upholding the Affordable Care Act. To help us sort out the factors impacting this lucrative segment, we turned to Philip Tobey, a Fellow of both the AIA and the American College of Healthcare Architects and Senior Vice President with SmithGroupJJR.
“Health industry providers legitimately expect significant efficiencies and lower costs for design and construction services, to go along with the economies that they themselves face with tighter and value-based reimbursement terms under health reform,” says Tobey, a member of Building Design+Construction’s Editorial Board.
In other words, AEC firms are going to have to share some of their healthcare clients’ pain. The drive for greater operational efficiency and lower cost in healthcare will be unrelenting, with bundled payments and shared savings models in lieu of traditional fee-for-service reimbursement forcing healthcare providers to eliminate wasteful practices.
Tobey sees three major trends emerging: 1) growing emphasis on ambulatory care, 2) medical systems integration, and 3) the “bundling/unbundling” of services.
SCROLL DOWN FOR GIANTS 300 TOP 25 AEC HEALTHCARE FIRM RANKINGS
1. PUSHING AMBULATORY CARE FACILITIES OUT
“The trend to push services out of the hospital into ambulatory settings will only intensify,” says Tobey. He notes, however, that there will be an “overwhelming need” to expand the front end of delivery—primary care, urgent care, and emergency departments—and to rationalize procedural and imaging resource capacity. At the same time, freestanding surgery and imaging centers may not be as prevalent in the future, and may need to be consolidated into larger hospital centers.
“Hospitals are not going away,” says Tobey, even though inpatient volumes are predicted to fall 5%, vs. 30% growth in outpatient volume. The sheer increased volume of patients, especially as baby boomers age, will inevitably drive up acute-care admissions. In the face of these seemingly countervailing trends, says Tobey, “The need to renovate outdated or obsolete facilities will be a strong driver in the healthcare business.”
2. INTEGRATING MEDICAL SYSTEMS MORE TIGHTLY
Tobey says the need for greater efficiency and ever-higher quality of care are not new goals for medical care or medical design, but hospital systems are being encouraged further by healthcare reform to streamline processes, with more mergers, acquisitions, and hospital-physician staff integrations on the horizon. “The industry’s even been talking about including services like long-term care and home care into this integrated approach,” he says.
Although there will always be a need for acute-care hospitals, Tobey sees a possible shift toward more community-based portals. As health systems continue to integrate, they will rely more and more on treatment venues outside the hospital to provide patients with coordinated preventive care and treatment for chronic conditions.
The IT component of hospital systems is already a natural for systems integration. “Providing the right information where it’s needed is essential for clinical care,” says Tobey, who foresees greater implementation of electronic medical records.
Are hospitals ready for lean?
“Everybody’s talking about it, but many hospital owners are wary of taking on lean,” says SmithGroupJJR’s Phil Tobey, FAIA, FACHA, whose firm is on the team for Sutter Health’s California Pacific Medical Center in San Francisco, the largest lean project in the U.S. “You have Sutter, which is totally lean, then you have clients who tell us not even to mention the word,” he says. “Others are applying the basic principles of lean construction without carrying the heavy weight of all that lean entails.”
Applying Lean/Six Sigma principles to healthcare, says Jeffrey C. Stouffer, AIA, a Principal with HKS, would result in “measurable outcomes and even risk sharing as part of the design and construction process” by eliminating unnecessary waste in construction and operations and increasing staff efficiency and safety, while reducing energy and staff costs for the hospital.
3. UNBUNDLING/BUNDLING OF HEALTHCARE SERVICES
Healthcare providers are “decanting” non-core functions—services like pharmacy, lab support, materials handling, and environmental management—from the mother ship into cheaper B-occupancy buildings. “Anything soft, anything that’s not high-tech, is being taken out,” says Tobey. “That’s the unbundling.”
However, once the unbundling of less-intense services has been accomplished, says Tobey, some hospital systems are opting to bundle the remaining hospital space, by placing beds back on top of the structure’s base diagnostic and support block, instead of having the traditional diagnostic/support chassis with attached nursing wings.
“You unbundle and decant the support services, then take the remaining high-intensity hospital base and put the beds on top,” says Tobey. A recent study for a 100-bed community hospital found that following such a scheme would result in 39% savings in construction costs per bed. +
TOP 25 HEALTHCARE SECTOR ARCHITECTURE FIRMS
Rank | Company | 2011 Healthcare Revenue ($) |
1 | HDR Architecture | 205,200,000 |
2 | HKS | 124,736,964 |
3 | Perkins+Will | 122,895,589 |
4 | Cannon Design | 121,000,000 |
5 | NBBJ | 116,401,000 |
6 | HOK | 102,695,248 |
7 | SmithGroupJJR | 74,600,000 |
8 | RTKL Associates | 68,421,405 |
9 | Perkins Eastman | 63,700,000 |
10 | Hammel, Green and Abrahamson | 61,900,000 |
11 | ZGF Architects | 54,338,355 |
12 | Heery International | 48,583,000 |
13 | HMC Architects | 42,715,899 |
14 | PageSoutherlandPage | 38,670,000 |
15 | IBI Group | 37,349,554 |
16 | Skidmore, Owings & Merrill | 33,950,000 |
17 | FKP Architects | 33,947,200 |
18 | Gresham, Smith and Partners | 32,876,981 |
19 | FreemanWhite | 28,500,000 |
20 | RBB Architects | 28,500,000 |
21 | LEO A DALY | 26,900,325 |
22 | BSA LifeStructures | 26,323,759 |
23 | EwingCole | 24,000,000 |
24 | KMD Architects | 20,161,678 |
25 | Ennead Architects | 19,875,000 |
TOP 25 HEALTHCARE SECTOR ENGINEERING FIRMS
Rank | Company | 2011 Healthcare Revenue ($) |
1 | AECOM Technology Corp. | 314,000,000 |
2 | Stantec | 109,980,000 |
3 | URS Corp. | 41,298,918 |
4 | Smith Seckman Reid | 38,300,000 |
5 | Jacobs | 32,950,000 |
6 | Parsons Brinckerhoff | 30,600,000 |
7 | KPFF Consulting Engineers | 28,000,000 |
8 | TTG|TMAD TAYLOR & GAINES | 27,677,900 |
9 | Mazzetti Nash Lipsey Burch | 24,988,296 |
10 | Degenkolb Engineers | 22,454,591 |
11 | Allen & Shariff | 21,577,769 |
12 | Bard, Rao + Athanas Consulting Engineers | 18,000,000 |
13 | ccrd partners | 17,100,000 |
14 | Atkins North America | 16,173,240 |
15 | AKF Group | 15,200,000 |
16 | KJWW Engineering Consultants | 14,607,369 |
17 | Syska Hennessy Group | 14,462,238 |
18 | Zak Companies | 13,882,705 |
19 | TLC Engineering for Architecture | 13,874,283 |
20 | Dewberry | 10,613,564 |
21 | Thornton Tomasetti | 9,860,000 |
22 | Sparling | 9,658,825 |
23 | Walter P Moore | 7,718,326 |
24 | M/E Engineering | 7,700,000 |
25 | Rutherford & Chekene | 7,650,000 |
TOP 25 HEALTHCARE SECTOR CONSTRUCTION FIRMS
Rank | Company | 2011 Healthcare Revenue ($) |
1 | Turner Corporation, The | 1,807,050,000 |
2 | McCarthy Holdings | 1,231,000,000 |
3 | Gilbane Building Co. | 1,091,777,000 |
4 | Clark Group | 1,067,411,678 |
5 | PCL Construction Enterprises | 869,130,091 |
6 | Brasfield & Gorrie | 833,522,003 |
7 | Skanska USA | 724,418,042 |
8 | JE Dunn Construction | 636,206,095 |
9 | Robins & Morton | 599,073,000 |
10 | DPR Construction | 588,199,172 |
11 | Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., The | 464,779,240 |
12 | Mortenson | 455,620,000 |
13 | Lend Lease | 434,626,482 |
14 | Hensel Phelps Construction | 425,760,000 |
15 | Suffolk Construction | 420,343,563 |
16 | Pepper Construction Group | 415,064,000 |
17 | Tutor Perini Corp. | 409,583,000 |
18 | Balfour Beatty US | 389,253,907 |
19 | Hunt Construction Group | 369,500,000 |
20 | Hoar Construction | 313,937,000 |
21 | Flintco | 291,400,000 |
22 | Layton Construction | 287,300,000 |
23 | HBE Corp. | 279,200,000 |
24 | Power Construction | 275,000,000 |
25 | Swinerton | 274,627,440 |
Related Stories
Giants 400 | Feb 6, 2023
2022 Religious Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. religious facility construction sector
HOK, Parkhill, KPFF, Shawmut Design and Construction, and Wiss, Janney, Elstner head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest religious facility sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Feb 6, 2023
2022 Justice Facility Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. justice facility/public safety sector
Stantec, DLR Group, Turner Construction, STO Building Group, AECOM, and Dewberry top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest architecture, engineering, and construction firms for justice facility/public safety buildings work, including correctional facilities, fire stations, jails, police stations, and prisons, as reported in the 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Feb 6, 2023
2022 Parking Structure Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. parking structure sector
Choate Parking Consultants, Walker Consultants, Kimley-Horn, PCL, and Balfour Beatty top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest parking structure sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Market Data | Feb 6, 2023
Nonresidential construction spending dips 0.5% in December 2022
National nonresidential construction spending decreased by 0.5% in December, according to an Associated Builders and Contractors analysis of data published today by the U.S. Census Bureau. On a seasonally adjusted annualized basis, nonresidential spending totaled $943.5 billion for the month.
Giants 400 | Feb 3, 2023
Top Workplace/Interior Fitout Architecture, Engineering, and Construction Firms for 2022
Gensler, Interior Architects, AECOM, STO Building Group, and CBRE top the ranking of the nation's largest workplace/interior fitout architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Multifamily Housing | Feb 3, 2023
HUD unveils report to help multifamily housing developers overcome barriers to offsite construction
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, in partnership with the National Institute of Building Sciences and MOD X, has released the Offsite Construction for Housing: Research Roadmap, a strategic report that presents the key knowledge gaps and research needs to overcome the barriers and challenges to offsite construction.
Steel Buildings | Feb 3, 2023
Top 10 structural steel building projects for 2023
A Mies van der Rohe-designed art and architecture school at Indiana University and Morphosis Architects' Orange County Museum of Art in Costa Mesa, Calif., are among 10 projects to win IDEAS² Awards from the American Institute of Steel Construction.
Multifamily Housing | Feb 2, 2023
St. Louis’s first transit-oriented multifamily development opens in historic Skinker DeBaliviere neighborhood
St. Louis’s first major transit-oriented, multi-family development recently opened with 287 apartments available for rent. The $71 million Expo at Forest Park project includes a network of pathways to accommodate many modes of transportation including ride share, the region’s Metro Transit system, a trolley line, pedestrian traffic, automobiles, and bike traffic on the 7-mile St. Vincent Greenway Trail.
Giants 400 | Feb 2, 2023
2022 Convention Center Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. convention and conference facilities sector
Clark Group, EUA, KPFF, Populous, TVS, and Walter P Moore top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest convention and conference facilities architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Multifamily Housing | Feb 1, 2023
Step(1) housing: A new approach to sheltering unhoused people in Redwood City, Calif.
A novel solution to homelessness will open soon in Redwood City, Calif. The compact residential campus employs modular units to create individual sleeping units, most with private bathrooms. The 240 units of housing will be accompanied by shared services and community spaces. Instead of the congregate dorm-style shelters found in many U.S. cities, this approach gives each resident a private, lockable, conditioned sleeping space.