Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) was initially developed in Europe as an alternative to stone, masonry and concrete construction. It is essentially mass timber plates made from smaller framing lumber laminated crosswise on their wide faces. North American CLT is typically laid up as three-, five-, seven-, and nine-layer panels of 2x6 lumber finger jointed lamstock.
Here in North America, one might first see these mass timber plates and wonder, “Why on earth would I need that big piece of wood to build with?” Well, there are several common misconceptions and myths surrounding the use of wood as a building material, especially these new mass timber CLT panels.
ALSO SEE: Mass timber construction grows up
The first myth I always hear is, “It won’t meet the code,” then next, “It's wood, it will just burn down.” My favorite is, “You are cutting down all our big trees.”
One of the best resources for clarifying the topic is the 2013 US CLT Handbook. FPInnovations—in collaboration with the American Wood Council (AWC), the United States (U.S.) Forest Products Laboratory, APA, and U.S. WoodWorks—published the comprehensive guide to provide technical information for building professionals, illustrating CLT applications adapted to current codes and standards. The handbook addresses a number of these common misconceptions about wood and CLT panels.
Myth #1 — “Cross laminated timber is not in the Building Code.”
CLT panels have great potential for providing cost-effective building solutions for residential, commercial, and institutional buildings, as well as large industrial facilities in accordance with the International Building Code.
In 2015, cross laminated timber will be incorporated in the International Building Code (IBC). The IBC recently adopted ANSI CLT Standard PRG 320 into the 2015 IBC, (see US CLT Handbook Chapter 1, p. 2) so you can request a design review based on it now and submit it as an alternate material, design and methods (AMM).
Myth #2 — “Cross laminated timber is a wood product and, therefore, easily catches on fire.”
Like using a few 12-inch-diameter logs to start a camp fire, mass timber does not catch fire easily. In fact, cross laminated timber acts more like concrete. Mass timber is not conventional so it is very hard to light, and once it is lit, it wants to put itself out (see US CLT Handbook Chapter 8, p. 2).
A research project recently completed at FPInnovations showed that CLT panels have the potential to provide excellent fire resistance, often comparable to typical heavy construction assemblies of non-combustible construction. CLT panels can maintain significant structural capacity for an extended duration of time when exposed to fire.
Myth #3 — “You have to bring in a specialized crew to install cross laminated timber.”
Keep in mind, CLT is just another form of glue laminated timber (glulam). It is just wood, so it designs and builds on the earlier technology. CLT panels, like other industry panels (precast concrete or SIP panels), provide easy handling during construction and a high level of prefabrication facilitation and rapid project completion.
A conventional wood installation crew with other panel experience can lift, set, and screw down CLT wood panels, and with a manufacturer provided installation plan, it goes even faster (see US CLT Handbook Chapter 12, p. 1).
Myth #4 — “Mass timber is not good for the environment since many trees need to be cut down to create the building material.”
CLT panels are manufactured 2x6 lumber from trees harvested from sustainably managed forests, and mostly Mountain Pine Beetle kill trees. If we don’t use them, they decay and emit carbon back into the atmosphere.
Wood is also the only primary structural material that grows naturally and is renewable. In fact, according to “Sustainable Forestry in North America,” during the last 50 years less than 2% of the standing tree inventory in the U.S. was harvested each year, while net tree growth was three percent.
Myth #5 — “Cross laminated timber is expensive.”
When considering the total in-place value of a CLT system, it is cost competitive to other plate building materials. But you also need to consider all the value added benefits:
• More savings can be found in the reduced installation cost, usually 50% cheaper than installing other plate materials.
• With an earlier project completion date, you are open for business sometimes months ahead of schedule.
• The building structure will weigh less than half the weight of other construction types, so the foundation costs less money.
• Job site safety is dramatically increased due to the prefabricated CLT panels and usually the only power tools are pneumatic drills.
The intent of cross laminated timber is not to replace light-frame construction, but rather to offer a versatile, low-carbon, and cost-competitive wood-based solution that complements the existing light frame and heavy timber options while offering a suitable candidate for some applications that currently use concrete, masonry, and steel.
While it is a relatively new building system of interest in North American construction, the benefits speak for themselves. For more information on CLT wood, visit www.masstimber.com.
About the author
Kris Spickler lives in Northern California and is a Heavy Timber Specialist for Structurlam Products Ltd. in Penticton, B.C., Canada. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering, with emphasis on wood structural design, from Fresno State University, California. As a California licensed Professional Engineer since 1981, he has worked in the Engineered Wood Products industry for 25 years. The last ten years he has focused on Engineered Wood Lumber used in Heavy Timber design and Cross Laminated Timber.
Related Stories
| May 7, 2012
2012 BUILDING TEAM AWARDS: Audie L. Murphy VA Hospital
How a Building Team created a high-tech rehabilitation center for wounded veterans of the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.
| May 3, 2012
2012 BUILDING TEAM AWARDS: Rush University Medical Center
This fully integrated Building Team opted for a multi-prime contracting strategy to keep construction going on Chicago’s Rush University Medical Center, despite the economic meltdown.
| May 3, 2012
Best commercial modular buildings and marketing programs recognized
Judges scored entries on architectural excellence, technical innovation, cost effectiveness, energy efficiency, and calendar days to complete.
| May 3, 2012
Zero Energy Research Lab opens at North Texas
The living lab—the only one of its kind in Texas—is designed to test various technologies and systems in order to achieve a net-zero consumption of energy.
| May 3, 2012
NSF publishes ANSI standard evaluating the sustainability of single ply roofing membranes
New NSF Standard provides manufacturers, specifiers and building industry with verifiable, objective criteria to identify sustainable roofing products.
| May 3, 2012
Ground broken for $94 million hospital expansion at Scripps Encinitas
New facility to more than double emergency department size, boost inpatient beds by 43%.
| May 3, 2012
Rudolph and Sletten, Inc. wins CMAA award
Firm recognized for the renovation of Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College’s Student Administrative & Griffin Student Center.
| May 2, 2012
Building Team completes two additions at UCLA
New student housing buildings are part of UCLA’s Northwest Campus Student Housing In-Fill Project.
| May 2, 2012
Sasaki selected for 2012 National Planning Firm Award
The award recognizes a firm for its body of distinguished work influencing the planning profession.
| May 1, 2012
White paper discusses benefits of diaphragm and piston flushometer valves
The white paper highlights considerations that impact which type of technology is most appropriate for various restroom environments.