flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

7 towers that define the 'skinny skyscraper' boom [slideshow]

7 towers that define the 'skinny skyscraper' boom [slideshow]

New York and Melbourne are leading the charge with six super-slender towers in the works. 


By BD+C Staff | February 5, 2014
Designed by Bjarke Ingels Group and James KM Cheng Architects, the 49-story Beach & Howe Tower in Vancouver features a twisting,

Recent advancements in structural design, combined with the loosening of density and zoning requirements, has opened the door for the so-called "superslim skyscraper."  

From New York to Melbourne to Vancouver, developers are planning high-rise structures on postage-stamp-sized parcels (OK, not that small, but we're talking lots as narrow as 22 feet) in dense urban locations. 

Developers love the building type because they can finally take advantage of land that was previously unusable for large multifamily and mixed-use structures.

Some projects, like the Beach & Howe Tower in Vancouver (see No. 2 below), utilize a narrow form to accommodate multiple structures on a given site.

To be considered "superthin" or "slender," a tower must have a height-to-width ratio of at least 10:1. A typical skyscraper, such as the Willis Tower, falls in the 7:1 range. The new crop of skinny towers blows those ratios out of the water. For example, the 111 West 57th Street project in New York City has a height-to-width ratio of 22.5:1.

Here's a quick look at some prominent skinny skyscraper projects in the works:

 

1. 111 West 57th Street, New York

Building Type: multifamily (100 units)
Height: 1,350 feet, 77 fours
Width: 60 feet

Building Team
Developer: JDS Development
Architect: SHoP Architects
Structural engineer: WSP Cantor Seinuk

More on 111 West 57th Street via CTBUH's Skyscraper Center

 

 

 

2. Beach & Howe Tower, Vancouver

Building Type: multifamily (407 units)
Height: 493 feet, 49 floors
Width: NA

Building Team
Developer: Westbank Corp.
Architects: Bjarke Ingels Group (BIG), James KM Cheng Architects
Structural engineer: Glotman Simpson Group
MEP engineer: Cobalt Engineering

More on the Beach & Howe Tower via CTBUH's Skyscraper Center

 

 

 

3. Phoenix Apartments, Melbourne, Australia

Building Type: multifamily (28 units)
Height: 290 feet, 29 floors
Width: 21 feet, 11 inches

Building Team
Developer: Equiset
Architect: Fender Katsalidis Architects

More on the Phoenix Apartments via Sidney Morning Herald

 

 

 

4. One57, New York

Building Type: mixed use, with hotel (210 rooms) and multifamily (92 units)
Height: 1,005 feet, 79 floors
Width: NA

Building Team
Developer: Extell Development Company
Design architect: Christian de Portzamparc
Executive architect: SLCE Architect LLP
Structural engineer: WSP Cantor Seinuk
MEP engineer: AKF Engineers
Exterior performance consultant: Israel Berger Associates
Interior designers: Yabu Pushelberg (hotel), Thomas Juul-Hansen, LLC (residential)
Contractor: Bovis Lend Lease

More on One57 via CTBUH's Skyscraper Center

 

 

 

5. 464 Collins Street, Melbourne

Building Type: mixed use, with multifamily (37 floors, 185 units) and office (13 floors)
Height: 593 feet, 50 floors
Width: 36 feet, 1 inch

Building Team
Developer: Equiset
Architect: Bates Smart

More on 464 Collins Street via Urban Melbourne

 

 

 

6. 432 Park Avenue, New York

Building type: multifamily (125 units)
Height: 1,397 feet, 85 floors
Width: 50 feet

Building Team
Developers: CIM Group, Macklowe Properties
Architects: Rafael Vinoly Architects, SLCE Architects
Structural engineer: WSP Cantor Seinuk
MEP engineer: WSP Flack + Kurtz
Contractor: Bovis Lend Lease

More on 432 Park Avenue via CTBUH's Skyscraper Center

 

 

7. 54 Clarke Street, Melbourne

Building Type: multifamily (256 units)
Height: 787 feet, 73 floors
Width: 39 feet, 4 inches

Building Team
Developer: Matrix & Cube
Architect: BKK Architects
Structural engineer: Macleod Consulting

More on 54 Clarke Street via Urban Melbourne

Related Stories

| Dec 12, 2011

Mojo Stumer takes top honors at AIA Long Island Design Awards

Firm's TriBeCa Loft wins "Archi" for interior design.

| Dec 10, 2011

10 Great Solutions

The editors of Building Design+Construction present 10 “Great Solutions” that highlight innovative technology and products that can be used to address some of the many problems Building Teams face in their day-to-day work. Readers are encouraged to submit entries for Great Solutions; if we use yours, you’ll receive a $25 gift certificate. Look for more Great Solutions in 2012 at: www.bdcnetwork.com/greatsolutions/2012.

| Dec 10, 2011

Energy performance starts at the building envelope

Rainscreen system installed at the west building expansion of the University of Arizona’s Meinel Optical Sciences Center in Tucson, with its folded glass wall and copper-paneled, breathable cladding over precast concrete.

| Dec 10, 2011

Turning Balconies Outside In

Operable glass balcony glazing systems provide solution to increase usable space in residential and commercial structures. 

| Dec 10, 2011

BIM tools to make your project easier to manage

Two innovations—program manager Gafcon’s SharePoint360 project management platform and a new BIM “wall creator” add-on developed by ClarkDietrich Building Systems for use with the Revit BIM platform and construction consultant—show how fabricators and owner’s reps are stepping in to fill the gaps between construction and design that can typically be exposed by working with a 3D model.

| Dec 9, 2011

BEST AEC FIRM 2011: MHTN Architects

Serving Utah for nearly eight decades.

| Dec 9, 2011

BEST AEC FIRM 2011: HMC Architects

Fostering a tradition of collaboration.

| Dec 9, 2011

BEST AEC FIRM 2011: Gensler

Developing talent on a global scale.

| Dec 9, 2011

BEST AEC FIRM 2011: Chapman Construction/Design

Taking sustainable practices to heart.

| Dec 9, 2011

BEST AEC FIRMS 2011: EYP Architecture & Engineering

Expertise-Driven Design: At EYP Architecture & Engineering, growing the business goes hand in hand with growing the firm’s people.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Urban Planning

Bridging the gap: How early architect involvement can revolutionize a city’s capital improvement plans

Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs) typically span three to five years and outline future city projects and their costs. While they set the stage, the design and construction of these projects often extend beyond the CIP window, leading to a disconnect between the initial budget and evolving project scope. This can result in financial shortfalls, forcing cities to cut back on critical project features.



Libraries

Reasons to reinvent the Midcentury academic library

DLR Group's Interior Design Leader Gretchen Holy, Assoc. IIDA, shares the idea that a designer's responsibility to embrace a library’s history, respect its past, and create an environment that will serve student populations for the next 100 years.

halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021