Blame it on the weather. That's what many economists have been doing over the past two months as economic data continue to disappoint. Retail sales, durable goods orders, and other categories have not been as strong as anticipated.
Nonresidential construction has often proved an exception, with the industry's momentum gaining steam recently. However, in February, nonresidential construction spending remained virtually unchanged, inching down 0.1% on a monthly basis, according to the April 1 release from the U.S. Census Bureau.
The February 2015 spending figure is 4.6% higher than February 2014, as spending for the month totaled $611.5 billion on a seasonally adjusted annualized basis. The estimate for January spending was revised downward, from $614.1 billion to $611.9 billion, while the government revised December's spending estimate upward from $627 billion to $629.3 billion.
"Construction is impacted more by weather than just about any economic segment, and the impact of February's brutal weather is evident in the government's spending figure," said Associated Builders and Contractors Chief Economist Anirban Basu. "ABC continues to forecast a robust nonresidential construction spending recovery in 2015, despite the most recent monthly data, with the obvious exceptions of industry segments most directly and negatively impacted by declines in energy prices.
"The broader U.S. economy has not gotten off to as good a start in 2015 as many had expected with consumer spending growth frustrated by thriftier than anticipated shoppers," said Basu. "With winter behind us and temperatures warming, the expectation is that economic growth will roar back during the second quarter, which is precisely what happened last year. To the extent that this proves to be true, nonresidential construction's recovery can be expected to persist."
Seven of 16 nonresidential construction subsectors posted increases in spending in February on a monthly basis.
- Manufacturing-related spending expanded 6.8 percent in February and is up 37.9% on a year-over-year basis.
- Conservation and development-related construction spending expanded 11% for the month and is up 19.8% on a yearly basis.
- Office-related construction spending expanded 2.4% in February and is up 19% from the same time one year ago.
- Amusement and recreation-related construction spending gained 2% on a monthly basis and is up 22.5% from the same time last year.
- Education-related construction spending grew 0.3% for the month, but is down 0.6% on a year-over-year basis.
- Construction spending in the transportation category grew 0.6% on a monthly basis and has expanded 9.3% on an annual basis.
- Lodging-related construction spending was up 5% on a monthly basis and 10.4% on a year-over-year basis.
Spending in nine nonresidential construction subsectors failed to rise in February.
- Healthcare-related construction spending fell 0.9% for the month and is down 4.5% for the year.
- Spending in the water supply category dropped 7.8% from January, but is still 7.4% higher than at the same time last year.
- Public safety-related construction spending lost 2.2% on a monthly basis and is down 9.6% on a year-over-year basis.
- Commercial construction spending lost 1.9% in February, but is up 13.5% on a year-over-year basis.
- Religious spending fell 4.8% for the month and is down 10.3% from the same time last year.
- Sewage and waste disposal-related construction spending shed 1.4% for the month, but has grown 19.9% on a 12-month basis.
- Power-related construction spending fell 4.5% for the month and is 17.2% lower than at the same time one year ago.
- Lodging construction spending is down 4.4% on a monthly basis, but is up 18.2% on a year-over-year basis.
- Sewage and waste disposal-related construction spending shed 7.5% for the month, but has grown 16% on a 12-month basis.
- Power-related construction spending fell 1.1% for the month and is 13.2% lower than at the same time one year ago.
- Communication-related construction spending fell 6.1% for the month and is down 15.5% for the year.
- Highway and street-related construction spending was unchanged in February and is up 3.3% compared to the same time last year.
To view the previous spending report, click here.
Related Stories
Building Team Awards | Apr 10, 2015
Virtual collaboration helps complete a hospital in 24 months
PinnacleHealth needed a new hospital STAT! This team delivered it in two years, start to finish.
Building Team Awards | Apr 10, 2015
New arts venue reinvigorates Virginia Tech's campus
The STV-led Building Team creates a world-class performance and arts venue with learning and entrepreneurial dimensions.
Building Team Awards | Apr 9, 2015
Multifaced fitness center becomes campus landmark
A sloped running track and open-concept design put this Building Team to the test.
Building Team Awards | Apr 9, 2015
Nation's first LEED-certified bus depot
A bus garage in Harlem shows that even the most mundane of facilities can strut its environmentally sensitive stuff.
Building Team Awards | Apr 9, 2015
Setting the bar for port-of-entry design
Whenever you eat a tomato from Mexico, there’s a one-in-three chance it came through this LEED Gold gateway.
Building Team Awards | Apr 9, 2015
Big D’s billion-dollar baby: New Parkland Hospital Tops the Chart | BD+C
Dallas’s new $1.27 billion public hospital preserves an important civic anchor, Texas-style.
Building Team Awards | Apr 9, 2015
IPD-driven fusion facility serves science and student life in Chicago
In dire need of modern science labs and a student union, North Park University built both—in the same building.
Building Team Awards | Apr 9, 2015
‘Prudent, not opulent’ sets the tone for this Catholic hospital
This Building Team stuck with a project for seven years to get a new hospital built for a faithful client.
Building Team Awards | Apr 9, 2015
9/11 museum triumphs over controversy
The Building Team for this highly visible project had much more than design, engineering, and construction problems to deal with.
Building Team Awards | Apr 7, 2015
Unique test facility will help make wind power more feasible
A new facility at Clemson University makes it possible to test the huge stresses that large-scale wind turbines must be able to withstand.