Builders, developers, and owners are constantly complaining that high-performance buildings rarely get their due from appraisers who, they say, don’t have good measures to compare one building’s energy savings over another’s, or how those savings affect the value of the building.
The Appraisal Foundation, a nonprofit organization authorized by Congress to establish appraisal standards, is working methodically to alter this perceived image of cluelessness. Within the next few weeks, the Foundation is expected to issue the final draft of its guidance related to background and competency for appraisers valuing green buildings.
John Brenan, the Foundation’s director of appraisal issues, tells BD+C that states may elect to start adopting this guidance by early next year. And while the guidance would be voluntary, Brenan believes it may serve as a safe harbor for appraisers performing appraisals on green buildings.
The final guidance relating to the valuation of green buildings may offer methods and techniques to allow compliance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP).
That Board—which utilizes panels of experts, including those with green-building expertise—is one of three independent boards that comprise the Foundation, the other two being the Appraiser Qualifications Board and the Appraisal Standards Board.
The Foundation is also working on more specific guidance for appraisers to use when valuing the “greenness” of one- to four-unit residential buildings; and commercial, multifamily, and institutional properties.
Brenan says these guidances would contain methods and techniques that show appraisers what to look for and how to compare a building’s green features, materials, and construction management with other buildings in a market.
He expects an initial “exposure draft” of these guidances could be available for public comment in the first quarter of 2015. “Our hope is that all three advisories are adopted by late 2015, so the Foundation would have a tool kit for appraisers and regulators to use.”
At press time, Brenan was unable to elaborate on the proposed methodologies. And he is quick to note that appraisers don’t set values; “they just mirror what’s going on in a market.”
He did note, however, that the guidance being developed includes how to compare properties that have sold with like green features, and how to recognize market-to-market differences.
“One of the most interesting potential [guidances] would be to look at anticipated cost savings over an extended period of time,” he says.
Brenan points out that there is never going to be a “plug-in formula” for green valuation that fits all buildings. “It is still completely market-driven, and markets are stratified. Just because you have green features doesn’t mean the appraisal will be apples to apples. It’s kind of a sliding scale.”
That being said, Brenan readily acknowledges that there aren’t enough appraisers out there who are competent enough to assess how high performance should be factored into a home’s valuation. He’s speaking from experience. “I live in California, in a home that has a solar photovoltaic system, and the appraiser didn’t know what to do with it. So that became a little educational experience.”
Brenan says that anyone in the building, design, and construction sectors who wants to get involving in helping to develop these guidances can contact him directly at John@appraisalfoundation.org.
Related Stories
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 K-12 School Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. K-12 school facilities sector
AECOM, Gilbane, and PBK head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest K-12 school facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Sports Facilities Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. sports facilities sector
Kimley-Horn, Mortenson, and Populous top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest sports facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Office Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. office building sector
Gensler, Jacobs, and STO Building Group head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest office building sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Hotel Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. hospitality sector
Gensler, Jacobs, and Suffolk Construction top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest hotel sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Healthcare Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. healthcare facilities sector
HDR, Jacobs, and Turner top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest healthcare facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Government Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. government buildings sector
HNTB, Jacobs, and Turner top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest government sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Cultural Facilities Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. cultural facilities sector
AECOM, Arup, and Populous head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest cultural facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 2, 2020
2020 Retail Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. retail building sector
Gensler, Jacobs, and PCL Construction top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest retail sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 2, 2020
2020 University Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the higher education sector
Gensler, AECOM, and Turner Construction top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest university sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 2, 2020
2020 Multifamily Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. multifamily building sector
Clark Group, Humphreys & Partners Architects, and Kimley-Horn head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest multifamily building sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
