Builders, developers, and owners are constantly complaining that high-performance buildings rarely get their due from appraisers who, they say, don’t have good measures to compare one building’s energy savings over another’s, or how those savings affect the value of the building.
The Appraisal Foundation, a nonprofit organization authorized by Congress to establish appraisal standards, is working methodically to alter this perceived image of cluelessness. Within the next few weeks, the Foundation is expected to issue the final draft of its guidance related to background and competency for appraisers valuing green buildings.
John Brenan, the Foundation’s director of appraisal issues, tells BD+C that states may elect to start adopting this guidance by early next year. And while the guidance would be voluntary, Brenan believes it may serve as a safe harbor for appraisers performing appraisals on green buildings.
The final guidance relating to the valuation of green buildings may offer methods and techniques to allow compliance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP).
That Board—which utilizes panels of experts, including those with green-building expertise—is one of three independent boards that comprise the Foundation, the other two being the Appraiser Qualifications Board and the Appraisal Standards Board.
The Foundation is also working on more specific guidance for appraisers to use when valuing the “greenness” of one- to four-unit residential buildings; and commercial, multifamily, and institutional properties.
Brenan says these guidances would contain methods and techniques that show appraisers what to look for and how to compare a building’s green features, materials, and construction management with other buildings in a market.
He expects an initial “exposure draft” of these guidances could be available for public comment in the first quarter of 2015. “Our hope is that all three advisories are adopted by late 2015, so the Foundation would have a tool kit for appraisers and regulators to use.”
At press time, Brenan was unable to elaborate on the proposed methodologies. And he is quick to note that appraisers don’t set values; “they just mirror what’s going on in a market.”
He did note, however, that the guidance being developed includes how to compare properties that have sold with like green features, and how to recognize market-to-market differences.
“One of the most interesting potential [guidances] would be to look at anticipated cost savings over an extended period of time,” he says.
Brenan points out that there is never going to be a “plug-in formula” for green valuation that fits all buildings. “It is still completely market-driven, and markets are stratified. Just because you have green features doesn’t mean the appraisal will be apples to apples. It’s kind of a sliding scale.”
That being said, Brenan readily acknowledges that there aren’t enough appraisers out there who are competent enough to assess how high performance should be factored into a home’s valuation. He’s speaking from experience. “I live in California, in a home that has a solar photovoltaic system, and the appraiser didn’t know what to do with it. So that became a little educational experience.”
Brenan says that anyone in the building, design, and construction sectors who wants to get involving in helping to develop these guidances can contact him directly at John@appraisalfoundation.org.
Related Stories
| Apr 8, 2014
Understanding value billing vs. conventional billing
Every company is a sum of the value it delivers to its clients. What differs from one company to the next is how that value is delivered and perceived. All too often, it is based solely on the fee you charge.
| Apr 8, 2014
Science, engineering find common ground on the Northeastern University campus [slideshow]
The new Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering Building is designed to maximize potential of serendipitous meetings between researchers.
| Apr 8, 2014
40 Under 40 winners: Meet the contractors
Of the up-and-coming AEC professionals to be named to the class of 2014, nine make their living as contractors.
| Apr 7, 2014
40 Under 40 winners: Meet the architects
Of the up-and-coming AEC professionals to be named 40 Under 40 winners by the editors of Building Design+Construction, 21 make their living in the architecture profession.
| Apr 4, 2014
$25 million Orion Jet Center designed by SchenkelShultz now open
As the centerpiece of the 45-acre campus, which is its first phase of a planned 215-acre mixed-use development, the 18,000 square foot executive terminal facility offers spacious passenger areas, administrative space, an executive suite, rental car kiosk, catering and a cafe.
| Apr 3, 2014
Security, accountability, and cloud access: Can you really have it all?
I’ve heard countless stories of conversations between project engineers and IT professionals who can’t come to an agreement on the level of security needed to protect their data while making it more accessible—not only externally, but also internally.
| Apr 2, 2014
The new model of healthcare facility management
A growing number of healthcare organizations are moving to an integrated real estate model in an effort to better manage costs, respond to regulatory requirements, and support changes in patient care delivery.
| Apr 2, 2014
8 tips for avoiding thermal bridges in window applications
Aligning thermal breaks and applying air barriers are among the top design and installation tricks recommended by building enclosure experts.
| Apr 2, 2014
Check out the stunning research facility just named 2014 Lab of the Year [slideshow]
NREL's Energy Systems Integration Facility takes top honors in R&D Magazine's 48th annual lab design awards.
| Apr 1, 2014
The risks of mismatched fire-rated assemblies
Mismatched fire-rated glass and framing happens more often than you think. Failing to confirm that the tested and listed performance capabilities of the framing system match those of the glazing can create a financial nightmare for the entire building team.
