BIM has been paying off for AE firm NELSON. “Once a team becomes proficient in the BIM process, we see better margins for projects completed in Revit,” says John “Ozzie” Nelson, Jr., President/CEO. “We see more RFPs that require Revit.” Creating Revit models opens up doors in analysis, data integration, facilities management, and advanced visualization, he says.
Perkins Eastman is starting to see results from its investment in BIM. “Our most recent in-house analysis of project labor costs on comparable CAD/BIM projects is showing an increase in BIM projects over CAD projects,” says Chair/CEO Bradford Perkins, FAIA, MRAIC, AICP. “Many of the other benefits of a BIM workflow are not so easily quantified, but they are real enough to give us confidence that BIM is paying off.”
SCROLL DOWN FOR GIANTS 300 BIM FIRM RANKINGS
Alex Ivanikiw, AIA, LEED AP, Senior Vice President at Barton Malow: “The real benefit is how the use of BIM enables collaboration, which in turn builds a real sense of trust and teamwork.” When subcontractors had trouble using the BIM model for submittal approval and materials fabrication, Barton Malow created a BIM 101 seminar to educate them in these processes, says Ivanikiw.
BIM projects have been profitable for Syska Hennessy Group, but there’s always room for improvement, says Co-president Gary Brennen, PE, LEED AP. SHG was “committed and fully invested in the early adoption of BIM,” but the MEP software still lags behind the architectural and structural components. “We were aware of that going into the process,” he says.
Structural engineering firm Magnusson Klemencic Associates is producing 100% of its projects as BIM models. “After many years of investment, we are finally turning the corner on implementing BIM in an efficient and thoughtful manner,” says MKA President Ron Klemencic, PE, SE.
The key to successful BIM implementation: “A project team with the experience and knowledge of what to model and how to model it,” says Klemencic.
“Allowing owners to better visualize the project has become an influencing factor during the presentation process,” says Doug Davidson, President, New South Construction. In 2011, over 45% of New South’s projects used BIM.
“There’s no question that BIM has paid off in our role as engineer of record producing construction drawings and as detailing engineer,” says Robert Otani, PE, LEED AP, Vice President of Thornton Tomasetti. The firm’s Construction Support Services practice uses BIM to produce digital fabrication drawings, connection engineering, and erection engineering for steel contractors. “The technology is constantly changing, and the engineers need to stay ahead of the curve,” says Otani.
KJWW Engineering recently standardized on Revit BIM in all 11 offices. President Paul VanDuyne, PE, says it was much more difficult to develop the MEP and technology components of the firm’s BIM platform than it was for structural engineering and medical equipment planning. “Now we are completing projects in close to the same time frame as previously with 3D, and in some cases faster,” he says.
EwingCole now uses an internal “cloud” for team members, who are now able to work on BIM through higher-end processors and central servers, says President Mark Hebden, AIA, LEED AP.
EYP Architecture & Engineering adopted BIM in 2006, and it has become a core competency. One unexpected benefit: “BIM integration has created more opportunities for younger tech-savvy staff to collaborate with senior technical team members,” says John Pocorobba, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP, Chief Operations Officer.
“It becomes apparent which market sectors are embracing BIM,” said Greg Lyon, Vice President and Director of Business Development at Nadel Architects, whose BIM work focuses on hospitality and retail clients.
“BIM implementation has been a long-term effort and a considerable one,” says Phil Harrison, FAIA, LEED AP, CEO of Perkins+Will. The firm has overcome the technical and training issues and is now “focusing on innovations and efficiencies,” he says.
Shepley Bulfinch has been using BIM since 2009 and now uses it for all projects. President Carole Wedge, FAIA, LEED AP, says BIM implementation has led to a “deeper exploration about how we approach our work, including how we draw and how we schedule our projects.”
According to Graef CEO John Kissinger, “We were early adopters. It was more difficult than we thought, but it is ingrained in all areas of our practice now.”
SmithGroupJJR began transitioning to Revit in 2005, and is now demonstrating a return on its BIM investment. On a daily basis, the firm peaks at around 310 concurrent users on Revit Architecture, Revit MEP, and Revit Structure.
President Steven Straus says Glumac made “an enormous investment” in BIM training and software development. “BIM is a new technology that is improving coordination,” he says, “but the software is not ready for prime time.”
“Not all contractors we work with are leveraging BIM. This means we have to spend more time preparing drawings in BIM than we normally would,” says BRPH President/CEO Brad Harmsen, AIA.
The chief conclusion from this survey: BIM is here to stay, but be prepared to invest staff time and money to perfect it. +
TOP 25 BIM ARCHITECTURE FIRMS
| Rank | Company | 2011 BIM Revenue ($) |
| 1 | HOK | 398,217,301 |
| 2 | HDR Architecture | 327,690,000 |
| 3 | Perkins+Will | 274,336,000 |
| 4 | Skidmore, Owings & Merrill | 204,000,000 |
| 5 | HKS | 200,000,000 |
| 6 | Cannon Design | 173,000,000 |
| 7 | SmithGroupJJR | 150,540,000 |
| 8 | RTKL Associates | 140,000,000 |
| 9 | Hammel, Green and Abrahamson | 76,740,000 |
| 10 | EYP Architecture & Engineering | 72,681,105 |
| 11 | Corgan Associates | 67,575,000 |
| 12 | Flad Architects | 65,100,000 |
| 13 | HNTB Architecture | 63,244,852 |
| 14 | Fentress Architects | 58,824,000 |
| 15 | DLR Group | 49,500,000 |
| 16 | BSA LifeStructures | 45,316,495 |
| 17 | PageSoutherlandPage | 44,918,630 |
| 18 | ZGF Architects | 40,352,152 |
| 19 | Ennead Architects | 39,341,000 |
| 20 | KMD Architects | 35,143,453 |
| 21 | Cooper Carry | 34,000,000 |
| 22 | Perkins Eastman | 32,500,000 |
| 23 | LS3P Associates | 32,211,134 |
| 24 | FKP Architects | 30,000,000 |
| 25 | Harley Ellis Devereaux | 28,740,000 |
TOP 25 BIM ENGINEERING FIRMS
| Rank | Company | 2011 BIM Revenue ($) |
| 1 | Jacobs | 355,021,036 |
| 2 | URS Corp. | 275,000,000 |
| 3 | Stantec | 181,300,000 |
| 4 | SSOE Group | 103,506,950 |
| 5 | Science Applications International Corp. | 92,695,000 |
| 6 | Thornton Tomasetti | 83,314,632 |
| 7 | KPFF Consulting Engineers | 60,000,000 |
| 8 | Burns & McDonnell | 50,000,000 |
| 9 | KJWW Engineering Consultants | 43,784,892 |
| 10 | Bard, Rao + Athanas Consulting Engineers | 32,000,000 |
| 11 | H&A Architects & Engineers | 29,883,975 |
| 12 | TLC Engineering for Architecture | 27,290,274 |
| 13 | STV | 26,646,000 |
| 14 | Glumac | 26,408,740 |
| 15 | Magnusson Klemencic Associates | 25,845,578 |
| 16 | Middough | 25,000,000 |
| 17 | R.G. Vanderweil Engineers | 24,912,000 |
| 18 | Michael Baker Jr., Inc | 24,000,000 |
| 19 | Syska Hennessy Group | 23,500,000 |
| 20 | Smith Seckman Reid | 21,360,000 |
| 21 | Bergmann Associates | 18,420,000 |
| 22 | ccrd partners | 16,700,000 |
| 23 | Rutherford & Chekene | 16,568,000 |
| 24 | Paulus, Sokolowski and Sartor | 15,500,000 |
| 25 | L.R. Kimball | 14,200,000 |
TOP 25 BIM CONSTRUCTION FIRMS
| Rank | Company | 2011 BIM Revenue ($) |
| 1 | Turner Corporation, The | 5,458,100,812 |
| 2 | URS Corp. | 4,150,000,000 |
| 3 | Hensel Phelps Construction | 2,230,890,000 |
| 4 | Mortenson | 2,220,000,000 |
| 5 | Balfour Beatty US | 2,070,776,637 |
| 6 | McCarthy Holdings | 1,897,000,000 |
| 7 | Holder Construction | 1,651,000,000 |
| 8 | Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., The | 1,282,424,019 |
| 9 | Lend Lease | 1,264,115,151 |
| 10 | Hoffman Corp. | 1,165,887,387 |
| 11 | Walsh Group, The | 1,128,436,530 |
| 12 | PCL Construction Enterprises | 1,100,346,901 |
| 13 | JE Dunn Construction | 1,097,865,953 |
| 14 | Clayco | 820,000,000 |
| 15 | DPR Construction | 691,319,178 |
| 16 | Swinerton | 653,859,000 |
| 17 | Gilbane Building Co. | 622,414,000 |
| 18 | Suffolk Construction | 621,498,214 |
| 19 | Structure Tone | 606,850,000 |
| 20 | Pepper Construction Group | 566,300,000 |
| 21 | Weitz Co., The | 560,000,000 |
| 22 | Manhattan Construction Group | 549,029,000 |
| 23 | Austin Industries | 547,065,203 |
| 24 | Power Construction | 530,000,000 |
| 25 | Brasfield & Gorrie | 504,676,926 |
Related Stories
Adaptive Reuse | Oct 22, 2024
Adaptive reuse project transforms 1840s-era mill building into rental housing
A recently opened multifamily property in Lawrence, Mass., is an adaptive reuse of an 1840s-era mill building. Stone Mill Lofts is one of the first all-electric mixed-income multifamily properties in Massachusetts. The all-electric building meets ambitious modern energy codes and stringent National Park Service historic preservation guidelines.
MFPRO+ News | Oct 22, 2024
Project financing tempers robust demand for multifamily housing
AEC Giants with multifamily practices report that the sector has been struggling over the past year, despite the high demand for housing, especially affordable products.
Performing Arts Centers | Oct 21, 2024
The New Jersey Performing Arts Center breaks ground on $336 million redevelopment of its 12-acre campus
In Newark, N.J., the New Jersey Performing Arts Center (NJPAC) has broken grown on the three-year, $336 million redevelopment of its 12-acre campus. The project will provide downtown Newark 350 mixed-income residential units, along with shops, restaurants, outdoor gathering spaces, and an education and community center with professional rehearsal spaces.
Office Buildings | Oct 21, 2024
3 surprises impacting the return to the office
This blog series exploring Gensler's Workplace Survey shows the top three surprises uncovered in the return to the office.
Healthcare Facilities | Oct 18, 2024
7 design lessons for future-proofing academic medical centers
HOK’s Paul Strohm and Scott Rawlings and Indiana University Health’s Jim Mladucky share strategies for planning and designing academic medical centers that remain impactful for generations to come.
Sports and Recreational Facilities | Oct 17, 2024
In the NIL era, colleges and universities are stepping up their sports facilities game
NIL policies have raised expectations among student-athletes about the quality of sports training and performing facilities, in ways that present new opportunities for AEC firms.
Codes and Standards | Oct 17, 2024
Austin, Texas, adopts AI-driven building permit software
After a successful pilot program, Austin has adopted AI-driven building permit software to speed up the building permitting process.
Resiliency | Oct 17, 2024
U.S. is reducing floodplain development in most areas
The perception that the U.S. has not been able to curb development in flood-prone areas is mostly inaccurate, according to new research from climate adaptation experts. A national survey of floodplain development between 2001 and 2019 found that fewer structures were built in floodplains than might be expected if cities were building at random.
Seismic Design | Oct 17, 2024
Calif. governor signs limited extension to hospital seismic retrofit mandate
Some California hospitals will have three additional years to comply with the state’s seismic retrofit mandate, after Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill extending the 2030 deadline.
MFPRO+ News | Oct 16, 2024
One-third of young adults say hurricanes like Helene and Milton will impact where they choose to live
Nearly one-third of U.S. residents between 18 and 34 years old say they are reconsidering where they want to move after seeing the damage wrought by Hurricane Helene, according to a Redfin report. About 15% of those over age 35 echoed their younger cohort’s sentiment.
