flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

California Supreme Court rules that architects can be sued by condo association

California Supreme Court rules that architects can be sued by condo association

Design defects will be fair game for lawsuits by residential groups


By BD+C Staff | July 11, 2014

California’s Supreme Court has ruled unanimously that the principal architects for a condominium project may be sued directly by a condominium homeowners association for design defects. 

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill and HKS, Inc. were the principal architects for a 595 unit condominium project built near AT&T Park in San Francisco. The case, Beacon Residential Community Association v. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP, pertained to a 595-unit condominium project built near AT&T Park in San Francisco.

The units allegedly developing several defects including water infiltration, structural cracks, and overheating that made units virtually uninhabitable at times. The homeowners association sued the architects, alleging that these defects were caused by negligent design.

The decision highlighted the closeness of the connection between the architects’ conduct and the plaintiffs’ injuries, the limited and predictable class of potential plaintiffs, and the absence of options for the owners in obtaining design services on their own. 

The decision held that even though, on most projects, the developer has the final say on design choices, the architect can’t escape liability to the end user. This decision is likely to give homeowners associations another target in defect cases. Architecture firms should consult their liability insurer to determine whether these claims will be covered.

(http://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/architects-may-be-sued-directly-by-homeo-19296/)

Related Stories

| May 31, 2012

Natural gas industry opposes federal carbon-neutral construction rule

The natural gas industry and some allies are working to block a federal green building rule that was expected to be a national model for carbon-neutral construction.

| May 31, 2012

Lawsuits push the legal boundaries of green building definition

This article explores some legal issues stemming from lawsuits in which plaintiffs have charged developers with not delivering on a promised level of sustainability.  

| May 31, 2012

ANSI approves Green Building Initiative’s design standard

The Green Building Initiative (GBI), a Portland, Ore. nonprofit organization, has had its new consensus-based standard for the design, construction, and operations of environmentally friendly buildings approved by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI).

| May 31, 2012

USGBC testing Minnesota buildings to see if they are living up to LEED standards

The Minnesota chapter of the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) has teamed up with EnergyPrint, a St. Paul, Minn. energy consulting firm, to study the energy and water use of more than 150 buildings in the state that have LEED certification.

| May 29, 2012

Reconstruction Awards Entry Information

Download a PDF of the Entry Information at the bottom of this page.

| May 25, 2012

Major retail chains welcome LEED Volume option

Large national chains such as Starbucks, Marriott, Verizon, and Kohl’s are welcoming the LEED Volume Program that enables them to batch certify similar projects.

| May 25, 2012

Alaska’s okay of gravel aggregate with naturally occurring asbestos opens up development

Some long-delayed projects in the Upper Kobuk region of Alaska may now move forward thanks to legislation that allows construction in areas that have naturally occurring asbestos.

| May 25, 2012

Las Vegas building codes may thwart innovative shipping container development

A developer wants to build a commercial development out of steel shipping containers in Las Vegas, but city codes would have to be altered or the project would have to obtain waivers for it to receive the city’s go-ahead.

| May 25, 2012

Collapse of Brooklyn building that killed worker blamed on improperly braced frame

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration cited SP&K Construction with 11 safety violations, for which it could face more than $77,000 in fines.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021