flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Cell and Genome Sciences Building, Farmington, Conn.

Cell and Genome Sciences Building, Farmington, Conn.


By By Jay W. Schneider, Editor | October 12, 2010

Administrators at the University of Connecticut Health Center in Farmington didn’t think much of the 1970s building they planned to turn into the school’s Cell and Genome Sciences Building. It’s not that the former toxicology research facility was in such terrible shape, but the 117,800-sf structure had almost no windows and its interior was dark and chopped up.

Enter the Building Team of Goody Clancy (architect) and FIP Construction (GC), who worked with the university to create an open, bright, and sustainable home (targeting LEED Silver) for three major research programs: UConn Stem Cell Institute, the R.D. Berlin Center for Cell Analysis and Modeling, and the Department of Genetics and Developmental Biology.

But how to get daylight deep into the lab spaces? Fortunately, the one-story framework allowed light to be brought in from above. The Building Team ran a 464-foot-long skylight the length of the main corridor, and clerestory windows were installed above the “Crossroads,” a central gathering and eating space that features a newly raised roof.

Additional daylighting comes from 56 new windows installed in exterior walls—not an easy task, given the building’s concrete panel construction. The team calculated the maximum window size allowable without compromising the panels and then standardized all windows to that size. Louvered sunshades were added above each of these.

Interior walls were also punched through with window openings to further distribute daylight. Leaving interior walls largely in place also kept construction costs down, to $259/sf (inclusive of site work). Also helping the budget: refurbishing and reconfiguring existing metal casework in research labs, which were extensively upgraded to modern research and safety standards, and finishing the new 100-seat auditorium in wood paneling left over from another campus project.

The facility’s wetlands site was carefully reconfigured to accommodate extra parking, and a bioretention pond was added to control runoff and keep stormwater out of the town’s sewer system. Also, because the existing building lacked a recognizable “front door,” a proper front entrance was added.

“It’s very difficult to do these types of buildings, and this one was very well done,” said David Callan, SVP, Environmental Systems Design, Chicago. “Excellent job on a low budget.” BD+C

PROJECT SUMMARY

Building Team

Submitting firm: Goody Clancy (architect)

Owner/developer: University of Connecticut Health Center

CM: FIP Construction

Structural engineer: LeMessurier Consultants Inc.

M/E engineer: Cosentini Associates

Plumbing engineer: BVH Integrated Services

General Information

Size: 117,813 gsf

Construction cost: $30.53 million

Construction time: September 2008 to June 2010

Delivery method: CM at risk

Related Stories

Resiliency | May 17, 2018

Architects brief lawmakers and policy-makers on disaster recovery as hurricane season approaches

Urge senate passage of disaster recovery reform act; Relationship-building with local communities.

Architects | May 14, 2018

4 tactics for our digital transformation

While our technology is becoming more advanced, the fundamental processes at the core of design and construction businesses have largely remained unchanged for decades.

Architects | May 8, 2018

WeWork names BIG’s Ingels as its Chief Architect

He’ll be plenty busy working with a company that has aggressive growth ambitions.

Architects | May 8, 2018

Illinois Office of Tourism unveils new Frank Lloyd Wright Trail

The trail stretches from Rockford to Springfield.

Architects | May 3, 2018

Designing innovative solutions for chronic homelessness

What’s stopping us from creating more Permanent Supportive Housing? 

Architects | Apr 27, 2018

4 reasons to pursue speaking engagements

We found speaking engagements were among the top ten marketing techniques that AEC firms employ.

Office Buildings | Apr 19, 2018

From fitness to bowling alleys: How commercial office buildings are differentiating themselves through amenities

Here are five ways that amenities can help developers and building owners attract and secure tenants by appealing to their inhabitants.

Architects | Apr 19, 2018

Perkins Eastman and Dougherty announce intent to merge

Combined practice will create expanded capabilities for K-12, higher education projects in California.

Architects | Apr 17, 2018

Cannon Design expects merger with gkkworks will help streamline its deliveries

The combined firm reinforces its presence in the western U.S.

Architects | Apr 16, 2018

Is the AEC industry ready to shake off its retrograde image?

Technology has been and always will be perceived as a source for wonder and worry.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Urban Planning

Bridging the gap: How early architect involvement can revolutionize a city’s capital improvement plans

Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs) typically span three to five years and outline future city projects and their costs. While they set the stage, the design and construction of these projects often extend beyond the CIP window, leading to a disconnect between the initial budget and evolving project scope. This can result in financial shortfalls, forcing cities to cut back on critical project features.



Libraries

Reasons to reinvent the Midcentury academic library

DLR Group's Interior Design Leader Gretchen Holy, Assoc. IIDA, shares the idea that a designer's responsibility to embrace a library’s history, respect its past, and create an environment that will serve student populations for the next 100 years.

halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021