flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Cell and Genome Sciences Building, Farmington, Conn.

Cell and Genome Sciences Building, Farmington, Conn.


By By Jay W. Schneider, Editor | October 12, 2010

Administrators at the University of Connecticut Health Center in Farmington didn’t think much of the 1970s building they planned to turn into the school’s Cell and Genome Sciences Building. It’s not that the former toxicology research facility was in such terrible shape, but the 117,800-sf structure had almost no windows and its interior was dark and chopped up.

Enter the Building Team of Goody Clancy (architect) and FIP Construction (GC), who worked with the university to create an open, bright, and sustainable home (targeting LEED Silver) for three major research programs: UConn Stem Cell Institute, the R.D. Berlin Center for Cell Analysis and Modeling, and the Department of Genetics and Developmental Biology.

But how to get daylight deep into the lab spaces? Fortunately, the one-story framework allowed light to be brought in from above. The Building Team ran a 464-foot-long skylight the length of the main corridor, and clerestory windows were installed above the “Crossroads,” a central gathering and eating space that features a newly raised roof.

Additional daylighting comes from 56 new windows installed in exterior walls—not an easy task, given the building’s concrete panel construction. The team calculated the maximum window size allowable without compromising the panels and then standardized all windows to that size. Louvered sunshades were added above each of these.

Interior walls were also punched through with window openings to further distribute daylight. Leaving interior walls largely in place also kept construction costs down, to $259/sf (inclusive of site work). Also helping the budget: refurbishing and reconfiguring existing metal casework in research labs, which were extensively upgraded to modern research and safety standards, and finishing the new 100-seat auditorium in wood paneling left over from another campus project.

The facility’s wetlands site was carefully reconfigured to accommodate extra parking, and a bioretention pond was added to control runoff and keep stormwater out of the town’s sewer system. Also, because the existing building lacked a recognizable “front door,” a proper front entrance was added.

“It’s very difficult to do these types of buildings, and this one was very well done,” said David Callan, SVP, Environmental Systems Design, Chicago. “Excellent job on a low budget.” BD+C

PROJECT SUMMARY

Building Team

Submitting firm: Goody Clancy (architect)

Owner/developer: University of Connecticut Health Center

CM: FIP Construction

Structural engineer: LeMessurier Consultants Inc.

M/E engineer: Cosentini Associates

Plumbing engineer: BVH Integrated Services

General Information

Size: 117,813 gsf

Construction cost: $30.53 million

Construction time: September 2008 to June 2010

Delivery method: CM at risk

Related Stories

40 Under 40 | Sep 21, 2017

Meet the 40 Under 40 Class of 2017

These AEC stars are making their mark in business, philanthropy, and in their communities.

Office Buildings | Sep 20, 2017

Five Stantec offices move into one Fifth Avenue location

The new location provides the firm with 40,000 sf of space.

Architects | Sep 19, 2017

What we talk about when we talk about placemaking

What does Good Growth mean and how do we set about achieving it?

Architects | Sep 13, 2017

Leo A Daly hires hospitality-design veteran to lead its Dallas office

Ken Martin views this sector as an incubator of innovation.

Museums | Sep 8, 2017

CAF announces plans for 20,000-sf Chicago Architecture Center to be built on East Wacker Drive

The Adrian Smith + Gordon Gill-designed space will open in summer 2018.

Architects | Sep 6, 2017

Top 110 university architecture firms

Perkins+Will, Gensler, and CannonDesign top BD+C’s ranking of the nation’s largest university sector architecture and AE firms, as reported in the 2017 Giants 300 Report.

Contractors | Sep 6, 2017

Following the money: G702 progress payment certifications

There is no single method of calculating progress payments, but the most common formula is the percentage of completion applied to the total contract price, less a retainage which is held by the owner until final acceptance of the project.

Multifamily Housing | Sep 5, 2017

Free WiFi, meeting rooms most popular business services amenities in multifamily developments

Complimentary, building-wide WiFi is more or less a given for marketing purposes in the multifamily arena.

Architects | Sep 1, 2017

5 reasons why AEC firms need to focus on employer branding

Not to be confused with the branding of your firm overall, your employer brand is defined by your reputation as a workplace.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Urban Planning

Bridging the gap: How early architect involvement can revolutionize a city’s capital improvement plans

Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs) typically span three to five years and outline future city projects and their costs. While they set the stage, the design and construction of these projects often extend beyond the CIP window, leading to a disconnect between the initial budget and evolving project scope. This can result in financial shortfalls, forcing cities to cut back on critical project features.



Libraries

Reasons to reinvent the Midcentury academic library

DLR Group's Interior Design Leader Gretchen Holy, Assoc. IIDA, shares the idea that a designer's responsibility to embrace a library’s history, respect its past, and create an environment that will serve student populations for the next 100 years.

halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021