flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Contractors expect to spend more time on prefabrication, according to FMI study

Contractors

Contractors expect to spend more time on prefabrication, according to FMI study

A new FMI study lays out the challenges, which include spurring demand among owners and specifiers. 


By John Caulfield, Senior Editor | June 4, 2024
Stantec illustrates the benefits of prefab multi-trade racking.
To illustrate the benefits of prefabrication, Stantec shows a multi-trade rack that features a modular frame with a custom assembly for standardized MEP components. Image credit: Stantec

Get ready for a surge in prefabrication activity by contractors.

FMI, the consulting and investment banking firm, recently polled contractors about how much time they were spending, in craft labor hours, on prefabrication for construction projects. More than 250 contractors participated in the survey, and the average response to that question was 18%. More revealing, however, was the participants’ anticipation that craft hours dedicated to prefab would essentially double, to 34%, within the next five years.

The studya sequel to FMI’s 2023 Labor Productivity Study—reiterates how the industry’s receptivity to prefab solutions corresponds with its ongoing labor shortages and compressed project schedules. (Contractors experienced approximately $30 billion to $40 billion in lost profits due to labor inefficiencies in 2022.) In its latest study, contractors told FMI that “improved quality” was prefab’s greatest perceived benefit. “Reducing the risk and variability” is how one contractor put it. Other benefits cited include reductions in construction schedules and improved worker safety.

(Nearly three fifths of the respondents to FMI’s study are MEP contractors, with another 15% being framing and drywall contractors.)

Contractors stated that improved quality is one of the main benefits of prefabrication. Charts credit: FMI

Contractors that consider prefabrication must determine how to do it at scale, profitably, and in a way that increases company earnings. Successful prefab practices, says FMI, require long-term strategic thinking and planning across an organization, along with the development of a comprehensive operational blueprint.

Which prefab model is right for pros?

It’s not like prefabrication is an alien concept for contractors. FMI’s study found that 86% of respondents currently offer single-trade prefab services. Three quarters of the concrete contractors surveyed said they are prefabricating on their jobsites; 57% of self-performing general contractors polled are prefabbing on-site, too.

What’s often lacking, however, is a clear vision of what they want their prefab capabilities to become. To make prefab work, says FMI, contractors need to shift their operating models, processes and systems. Contractors also need to decide which prefab models and combinations would work best for their companies; these include kitting services, multi-trade services, procurement, and modular services.

In making these determinations, contractors should be asking themselves:

•Why do we want to do more prefabrication? 
•What is the total addressable portion of our work mix (today) that could be prefabricated? 
•What investments would need to be made to scale our prefabrication capabilities to capture that opportunity? 
•When fully optimized, what does the earnings stream from prefabrication look like? 
•What does the return on investment look like for the enterprise? 
•Do we have alternative investment options for other initiatives in the business? How do those options stack up against our prefabrication ambitions? 
•Will prefab make the company better, more profitable, and resilient?


Prefabrication a different kind of business
 

For prefabrication to accelerate, contractors need to see more receptive owners and designers.

Prefabrication is a manufacturing endeavor that’s different from building construction. Contractors diving into prefab in a bigger way need to think about whether prefab will be a unique business or separate entity, and how autonomously construction and prefabrication operate? Will prefab services be proprietary or available to other contractors? Will prefab be a profit or cost center? How will manufacturing cost overruns, if there are any, be accounted for?
 

FMI says that contractors need to establish clear project management lines that encompass how prefabricated products are tracked, stored, and billed for. Tracking labor productivity across prefabrication and field installation is key.

Owners and designers need to buy in more
 

Contractors must decide what type of prefab service works best for their business and clients.

One of the contractors whom FMI polled mentioned a recent casino and hotel project that required 25% less labor in the field, and cut nearly two months off of its installation time, by using prefabrication methods.

Scheduling is driving prefab demand, says FMI. But expanding that demand depends on acceptance by owners and AEC firms, and right now, that acceptance is middling: only 18% of the contractors polled by FMI said that owner-specific requests drove prefab, and only 10% said that prefab was specified by architects or engineers.

“For the industry to realize substantial gains in prefabrication and productivity, owners and designers need to be a bigger part of the demand equation,” says FMI.

FMI’s study found that the industry still struggles with broad adoption. The biggest challenges to adopting prefab are a project’s design and coordination, stakeholder awareness and education, the mindset and culture of a project’s active players, and the investment in facilities and equipment.

But given current and projected labor force limitations, “it’s clear that prefabrication will need to become part of the solution.” For that to happen, building teams need to demonstrate a bolder vision, strategic planning, commitment to investing, consistent communication, and a proactive engagement by external stakeholders. 

Related Stories

| Apr 25, 2012

Thornton Tomasetti/Fore Solutions provides consulting for Biologics Support Center

Project receives LEED Gold Certification.

| Apr 25, 2012

McCarthy introduces high school students to a career in construction

High school students from the ACE Mentoring Program tour the new CHOC Children’s Patient Tower in Orange, Calif.

| Apr 25, 2012

Missner Group names McCrory VP of property management

McCrory will be responsible for overseeing the financial and operational needs of the firm’s commercial real estate portfolio which includes more than two million square feet of property.

| Apr 25, 2012

Rogers joins Morgan/Harbour as senior project manager

Rogers will also manage the construction process and daily activities as well as act as the interface between the subcontractors, owners, municipalities and regulatory agencies

| Apr 25, 2012

J.C. Anderson selected for 50,000-sf build out at Chicago’s DePaul University

The build-out will consist of the construction of new offices, meeting rooms, video rooms and a state-of-the-art multi-tiered Trading Room.

| Apr 24, 2012

ULI Real Estate Consensus Forecast, projects improvements for the real estate industry through 2014

Survey is based on opinions from 38 of the nation’s leading real estate economists and analysts and suggests a marked increase in commercial real estate activity, with total transaction volume expected to rise from $250 billion in 2012 to $312 billion in 2014.

| Apr 24, 2012

Roofing Supply Group acquired by Clayton, Dubilier & Rice

RSG provides a complete offering of residential and commercial roofing materials and related supplies.

| Apr 24, 2012

McLennan named Ashoka Fellow

McLennan was recognized for his work on the Living Building Challenge.

| Apr 24, 2012

AECOM design and engineering team realizes NASA vision for Sustainability Base

LEED Platinum facility opens at NASA Ames Research Center at California’s Moffett Field.

| Apr 23, 2012

Vegas’ CityCenter called financial ‘black hole’

Two and a half years ago, stockholders filed six lawsuits after the stock price fell from $99.75 on Oct. 9, 2007, to $1.89 on March 5, 2009. Bondholders sued over similar steep losses.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021