The cloud is coming of age. Fortune 500 companies like Coca-Cola and General Mills that once exclusively managed their own data centers are starting to migrate to the cloud. They’ve found that outsourcing vital IT infrastructure can be a reliable, cost-effective strategy.
The data center industry is projected to double by 2021 from its capacity in 2015, according to real estate consultant JLL. An expected explosion in Internet of Things applications will lead to even more bits and bytes being collected, stored, and analyzed. Factor in what JLL calls “American consumers’ insatiable thirst for digital content,” and you have explosive demand for data storage.
One new mini-trend: Cloud providers are spreading capacity near NFL cities, says Scott Ruch, AIA, Executive Managing Principal and Critical Facilities Sector Leader with Corgan, referring to large cities with National Football League teams.
New migrants to the cloud are also building their data centers to their large metro areas in order to sleep better knowing vital infrastructure is easily accessible near corporate offices. “They want the ability to check in on those facilities,” Ruch says. But rural areas with temperate climates (for more cost-efficient cooling) and low utility rates are still in the mix.
In Europe, some countries now require sensitive data to be housed within their borders. These regulations have complicated data center location decisions, in some cases forcing companies to build out sites in several countries rather than building one consolidated facility.
Data centers are getting cheaper to build. Five to 10 years ago, the average cost was $15-20 million per megawatt, Ruch says. Today, it’s $7-15 million. Customers are spending more wisely on risk mitigation. Shells to be used in high-risk hurricane and tornado zones must still be built to withstand 170-mph winds, but outside of those zones, less costly 120-mph-resistant structures will do.
UPS system design has been upgraded such that most facilities use block-redundant designs, which provide about 20% backup power redundancy, rather than more expensive two-end systems, with 100% redundancy. The smaller backup capacity is usually adequate for the mega-facilities being built by the big providers: if one site goes down completely, they can switch to another data center, Ruch says. Most of the big cloud providers have enough system-wide capacity to weather a short, single-site shutdown.
ALSO SEE: BD+C Giants 300 data centers rankings
Top 25 data center architecture firms
Top 30 data center engineering firms
Top 35 data center construction firms
RECYCLING OLDER DATA CENTERS
Many legacy data centers are becoming obsolete. As a result, a niche market in salvaged equipment has surfaced, says Jonathan Clay, President and CEO, The Blue River Group. Chillers, raised flooring, and backup generators can be reused, he says. Some older equipment is finding its way to Asia, Africa, and Mexico. “There’s no reason to put it in a landfill,” says Clay.
Data centers are also making significant strides in energy efficiency. Most cloud providers today aim for a power usage effectiveness rating of 1.25 or less, Ruch says, well ahead of the 1.5 to 1.6 PUE range of the last decade.
Indirect/direct evaporative cooling, known as IDEC, which uses outside ambient air for cooling purposes, has been refined to the point where even air temperatures in the low 80s can be suitable. Pinpoint cooling can be directed to specific racks rather than to the entire space, says Clay. Alternating hot racks with cool racks can also reduce the overall cooling burden. Removing the chassis from servers makes cooling more effective, too.
Some data centers track and publish their PUEs—some as low as 1.1—online and in real time, according to published reports. Big players like Google, Facebook, and Intel are leading the way. Salesforce recently said it has achieved net-zero greenhouse gas emissions and is now providing a carbon-neutral cloud for all customers.
These are encouraging developments. But with demand for storage capacity rising as fast as you can say YouTube, will data center providers be able to keep up?
SEE ALL 2017 GIANTS 300 RANKINGS
Related Stories
Giants 400 | Jan 3, 2022
2021 Religious Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. religious facility construction sector, as reported in the 2021 Giants 400 Report
Gensler, KPFF, Crossland Construction, and Rogers-O'Brien Construction head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest religious facility sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2021 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Jan 3, 2022
2021 Government Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. government buildings sector
Stantec, Jacobs, Turner Construction, and Hensel Phelps top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest government sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2021 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 31, 2021
2021 Science and Technology Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. S+T facilities sector
HDR, CRB, Jacobs, Skanska USA, and Whiting-Turner Contracting Co. top the rankings of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2021 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 5, 2021
2021 Reconstruction Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. building reconstruction and renovation sector
STO Building Group, Alfa Tech Consulting Engineers, Gensler, and Stantec top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest reconstruction sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2021 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 5, 2021
2021 Telecommunications Facility Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. telecommunications facility sector
Alfa Tech Consulting Engineers, AECOM, Kimley-Horn, and BRPH head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest telecommunications facility sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2021 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 5, 2021
2021 Justice Facility Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. justice facility/public safety sector
Turner Construction, DLR Group, AECOM, and Stantec top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest architecture, engineering, and construction firms for justice facility/public safety buildings work, including correctional facilities, fire stations, jails, police stations, and prisons, as reported in the 2021 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2021
2021 Hotel Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. hospitality sector
Gensler, Jacobs, Suffolk Construction, and WATG top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest hotel sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2021 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Nov 20, 2021
2021 Transit Facility Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. transit facility sector
Perkins and Will, Walsh Group, AECOM, and HDR top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest transit facility sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2021 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Nov 20, 2021
2021 Parking Structure Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. parking structure sector
PGAL, PCL Construction, and Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest parking structure sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2021 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Nov 20, 2021
Top 10 Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) Construction Firms for 2021
Gilbane, BartonMalow, Whiting-Turner, and Hensel Phelps head the rankings of the nation's largest integrated project delivery (IPD) construction firms for buildings construction work, according to BD+C's 2021 Giants 400 Report.
