flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Deadline Extended: 2012 "Best AEC Firms to Work For” Awards

Deadline Extended: 2012 "Best AEC Firms to Work For” Awards

We’re looking for firms that create truly positive workplaces for their AEC professionals and support staff. In other words, this awards program will recognize those AEC firms that nurture and develop their most valuable asset—their people.


August 24, 2011

Building Design+Construction's

“Best AEC Firms to Work For” Awards

 

Please submit your entry by November 27, 2012

 

 

 

Is your AEC firm a “Best AEC Firm to Work For”?

Building Design+Construction is looking for the “best AEC firms to work for” in the worldwide AEC industry—the firms that excel in innovative recruitment and retention practices, professional development, social and corporate responsibility, workplace environment, compensation/benefits, and business practices. Previous winners are not eligible, only new entrants, please.

We’re looking for firms that create truly positive workplaces for their AEC professionals and support staff. In other words, this awards program will recognize those AEC firms that nurture and develop their most valuable asset—their people.

Winning firms will be featured as case studies in an upcoming issue of Building Design+Construction.Winners will not be ranked: All will be designated equally as BD+C“Best AEC Firms to Work For.”

“Best AEC Firms to Work For” may come from the following fields related to the AEC community:

  • Architecture
  • Construction
  • Construction management
  • Design/build
  • Engineering (M/E/P, structural, acoustic, etc.      
  • Project management

Note: Firms whose work is primarily related (i.e., more than 50% of revenues) to single-family housing or civil engineering are not eligible

Qualities and Characteristics We’re Looking For

  • Innovative recruitment and retention practice
  • Professional development, education, and training
  • Social, environmental, and corporate responsibility
  • Workplace environment
  • Extraordinary compensation and benefits practices
  • General business practices (profitability, business sustainability)
  • Public perception of your firm or company

Entries will be judged by the editors of Building Design+Construction, whose decisions are final.

Be sure to include:

  • Descriptions of the firm’s recent work or projects
  • Firm brochures and promotional materials
  • Reprints of articles about the firm or the firm’s work
  • Testimonials from clients or others familiar with the firm’s work
  • Awards received
  • Mission Statement, Core Values, Vision Statement

Entry fee:

$150 for firms with more than 100 employees
$100 for firms with 100 employees or less

Entries must be received by November 27, 2012.

Send Entry Materials and address all questions to:

Tim Gregorski, Senior Editor
Building Design+Construction
3030 W. Salt Creek Lane, Suite 201
Arlington Heights, IL 60005-5025
847.954.7941
tgregorski@sgcmail.com

 

Note: By submitting your entry, you give permission to Building Design+Constructionand SGC/Horizon, LLC to publish information from your entry and contact you via email. You may mark specific sections regarding confidential information for discussion of disclosure with the editors. Information about firms that are not selected will be kept confidential by BD+Cand SGC/Horizon, LLC.

Competition Rules and Guidelines

1.    Your entry must reflect practices across the entire firm, not just individual offices, divisions, or departments.

2.    Only factors over which the firm has control will be given consideration by the judges. For example, claiming that your firm is a great place to work because it is “located in a temperate climate” would not count. However, if you had a policy to “locate all firm offices near public transit” to encourage use of rail or bus by your employees, that would be of interest (especially if the firm also subsidized those employees who used public transit).

3.    Please back up your claims with data, examples, proven results, etc. For example, if your firm has a “high retention level,” we want to know the % of voluntary retention and specific reasons why retention is high. If you have an “award-winning” in-house university, tell us the number of CE units taken last year, the % of employees participating in the program, the amount allocated per employee, etc. In other words, we want PROOF.

4.    This awards program does not recognize routine practices related to compensation or benefits. We assume that you pay your people fairly and offer reasonable benefits. We’re looking for what you do beyond the ordinary, and what impact such efforts have in creating a better work environment for your employees. Therefore, to be chosen, your firm has to be “the best” at employee relations, not “routine.”

5.    “Best AEC Firms to Work For” is not a design, engineering, or construction competition. It is about your internal environment, and only implicitly about your work product. Therefore, it is not necessary to submit a portfolio of your firm’s work, unless it illustrates a key point in your entry.

6.    Your firm does not have to be the best in every category to be recognized. Therefore, you don’t have to tell us about every item in the suggested checklist. Concentrate on what you do well. What makes your firm stand out?

7.    Remember, if more than 50% of your firm’s revenue is derived from single-family or civil engineering, your firm may not be eligible. Exception: A homebuilding or civil engineering firm with a completely separate commercial division may be eligible, provided the commercial division follows the same HR policies as the main firm.

8.    The selected firms will be featured as case studies in an upcoming issue. Winners will not be ranked.

To view past “Best AEC Firms to Work For” winners, go to:

www.bdcnetwork.com/BestAECFirms


 

Building Design+Construction's

 

“Best AEC Firms to Work For”

 

Nomination Form

Please submit your entry by November 27, 2012

 

NOTE: There are 5 steps involved in submitting:

STEP 1.  Tell us who you are. [All fields are required.]

Name of Firm:_________________________________________________________

Address:______________________________________________________________

City:_________________________________________________________________

State/Province:_________________________________________________________

Postal/ZIP Code:________________________________________________________

Country (if not U.S.):____________________________________________________

Main Phone Number:____________________________________________________

Web Address:__________________________________________________________

Name of Person Submitting Entry:__________________________________________

Organization (if different from firm):________________________________________

Title or Position:________________________________________________________

Address:______________________________________________________________

City:_________________________________________________________________

State/Province:_________________________________________________________

Postal Code:___________________________________________________________

Country (if not U.S.):____________________________________________________

Direct Telephone Number:________________________________________________

E-mail Address:________________________________________________________

Please check the AEC firm’s primary professional area:

[ ]    Architecture

[ ]     Construction

[ ]      Construction management

[ ]      Design/build

[ ]     Engineering (M/E/P, structural, acoustic, etc.)

[ ]      Project management

Note: AEC firms whose work is primarily (more than 50% of revenues) related to single-family housing or civil engineering may not be eligible. For a ruling on this issue, contact: Tim Gregorski, 847.954.7941, tgregorski@sgcmail.com

Please give your firm’s Mission Statement, Core Values, or Vision Statement (as stated either publicly or internally to staff), if you have such a document.

___________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________

[ ] Firm does not have such a policy or document (not required, and not a negative factor in judging).

Step 2. Tell us the 3 most important things about your firm and why it is a “Best AEC Firm to Work For”.

Summary (very important!)

Please state the 3 main reasons your firm should be named a BD+C“Best AEC Firm to Work For”:

  1. ____________________
  2. ____________________
  3. ____________________

STEP 3.  Tell us why yours is a “Best AEC Firm to Work For.”

Written Statement of Support

Please include a written statement with your entry, using the following as suggested topics. You are not required to discuss every item, nor must you limit your statement to these factors. We recommend, however, that you give adequate attention to the “3 chief factors” listed in your entry.

Innovative Recruitment and Retention Practices

  • Recruitment: What unique or unusual methods do you use to attract the best and brightest? What is your “hit rate” in recruiting at various levels? Do you have different methods for recruiting experienced staff vs. new graduates?
  • Retention: How does the firm keep people happy and enthusiastic? Do you have programs to reduce the stress of today’s work environment? What is your record of promotion from within? Is your retention rate declining? Why? How do you make sure you’re not keeping people you shouldn’t be keeping? Are there clear lines of career development and opportunities for advancement? Do you offer special benefits for long-term service? Do you have a mandatory retirement age? Do you encourage staff to stay on beyond normal retirement age?

Professional Development, Education, and Training

  • Career Development: Are there clear lines of career development and opportunities for advancement? Is this communicated to professionals and staff? What unusual programs or initiatives do you have in place to help employees move up the ladder? How do you measure the success of these initiatives?
  • Education and Training: How does the firm promote lifelong learning and professional development? Is training and education linked to the firm’s mission, values, and client needs? Does the firm offer tuition reimbursement? Does it reimburse employees for Learning Units? Do you have an in-house continuing education program? Does the firm solicit ideas and assess needs for training and education from the staff? Approximately how much does your firm spend annually per professional employee on continuing education or training? How does this compare to what other firms are doing? Does your firm measure the effectiveness of continuing education or training and its impact on actual practice?
  • Mentoring: Do you have a formal mentoring program? Do you have any evidence that it produces positive results? Do you have alternatives or supplementary programs to more traditional mentoring?
  • Performance Recognition Programs: How does the firm acknowledge the contributions of its best employees? Do you have any measure of the effectiveness of your performance recognition efforts?

Social, Environmental, and Corporate Responsibility

  • Social Responsibility: How is the firm involved in community outreach, public service, charitable work (esp. pro bono), etc.? (Note: Donating money to charity does not count.) Do you have any special programs for women, minority, disabled employees, or military veterans?
  • Environmental Responsibility: How does your firm “walk the talk” regarding the environment? How do you stress environmental responsibility within the firm’s own practices?
  • Corporate Citizenship and Industry Leadership: How does the firm contribute to its respective AEC industry and professional societies? In what extraordinary ways does the firm contribute to the local economy or business community?

Workplace Environment

  • Work Environment: What do you do to make your workplace more creative, stimulating, professionally rewarding, and fun?
  • Working Conditions: Do you provide the tools your people need to do their jobs? Are there any extraordinary efforts to make the workspace environmentally sound (e.g., indoor air quality, daylighting, temperature control, acoustics)? Are employees’ workspace needs given priority? How does the firm evaluate employee satisfaction with their working conditions? Do you act on employee recommendations?
  • Work/Life Balance: How do you help your professional and support staff deal with stress on the job? What programs do you have in place to balance work and home life (e.g., flex time, job share, sabbaticals, etc.)? Note: Compliance with government-mandated programs does not count.
  • Nontraditional Benefits: Does the firm offer benefits that go beyond the ordinary; for example, on-site daycare, priority parking for hybrid vehicles, personal finance counseling, special services for employees in distress (divorce, death in family, etc.)? Have employees initiated any efforts to help co-workers in distress or with special needs?
  • Internal Communications: What extraordinary or unusual ways do you employ to keep your employees informed about the firm’s activities? How do you assess employee attitudes and needs? How does the firm communicate its mission, values, and goals? How do you know these efforts are effective?

Extraordinary Compensation and Benefits Practices

  • Compensation Programs: What innovative compensation schemes do you have in place (with evidence of their effectiveness)?
  • Health-related Benefits: In-house fitness center? End-smoking campaign? CPR training? Other benefits innovations?

General Business Practices

  • Management Practices: Is the firm financially sound? Is it profitable? Do people get paid on time? Is the firm growing? Is market share increasing? Is there job stability? Is your business expanding? Are you entering new markets or expanding existing markets?
  • Reputation: Does the firm have a strong reputation in the business community, with clients, in its professional association, etc.? How much repeat business do you get from clients? Note: You may list appropriate awards and supply other evidence or testimonials of peer perception, client satisfaction, or professional image.

Public Perception of Your Firm

  • How is your firm perceived in your community or nationally? Has your firm or company been recognized by community organizations, public entities, or the media?
  • Note: If your firm or company has won “Best Firm (or Company)” awards from other publication or organization, you may include this material with your entry; if possible, include judging criteria.]

STEP 4. Send us “hard copy” of your entry.

Please send a printed copy of your Written Statement of Support and any additional materials that support your entry to: Tim Gregorski, BD+C “Best Firms Awards,” 3030 W. Salt Creek Lane, Suite 201, Arlington Heights, IL 60005-5025.

  • Descriptions of the firm’s recent work or projects
  • Firm brochures and promotional materials
  • Reprints of articles about the firm or the firm’s work
  • Testimonials from clients or others familiar with the firm’s work
  • Awards received
  • Mission Statement, Core Values, Vision Statement

STEP 5. Select method of payment.

Method of Payment

  • Check enclosed (payable to “Building Design+Construction”)
  • Credit Card Payment (complete and submit form below)

Amount

  • $150 (firms with more than 100 employees)
  • $100 (firms with 100 employees or less)

Credit Card Payment Form

(This information will be kept confidential).

1. Project/submission name:

2. Submitting firm:

3. Name on card:

4. Card Type (MC, Visa, or Amex):

5. Card number:

6. Exp date:

7. Billing address:

8. Billing City:

9. Billing State:

10. Billing Zip:

11. Billing Country:

12. Phone Number:

13. Confirmation e-mail: 

Related Stories

| Nov 16, 2010

Architecture Billings Index: inquiries for new projects remain extremely high

The new projects inquiry index was 61.7, down slightly from a nearly three-year high mark of 62.3 in September, according to the Architecture Billings Index (ABI). However, the ABI dropped nearly two points in October; the October ABI score was 48.7, down from a reading of 50.4 the previous month. The ABI reflects the approximate nine to 12 month lag time between architecture billings and construction spending.

| Nov 16, 2010

Brazil Olympics spurring green construction

Brazil's green building industry will expand in the coming years, spurred by construction of low-impact venues being built for the 2016 Olympics. The International Olympic Committee requires arenas built for the 2016 games in Rio de Janeiro meet international standards for low-carbon emissions and energy efficiency. This has boosted local interest in developing real estate with lower environmental impact than existing buildings. The timing couldn’t be better: the Brazilian government is just beginning its long-term infrastructure expansion program.

| Nov 16, 2010

Green building market grows 50% in two years; Green Outlook 2011 report

The U.S. green building market is up 50% from 2008 to 2010—from $42 billion to $55 billion-$71 billion, according to McGraw-Hill Construction's Green Outlook 2011: Green Trends Driving Growth report. Today, a third of all new nonresidential construction is green; in five years, nonresidential green building activity is expected to triple, representing $120 billion to $145 billion in new construction.

| Nov 16, 2010

Calculating office building performance? Yep, there’s an app for that

123 Zero build is a free tool for calculating the performance of a market-ready carbon-neutral office building design. The app estimates the discounted payback for constructing a zero emissions office building in any U.S. location, including the investment needed for photovoltaics to offset annual carbon emissions, payback calculations, estimated first costs for a highly energy efficient building, photovoltaic costs, discount rates, and user-specified fuel escalation rates.

| Nov 16, 2010

CityCenter’s new Harmon Hotel targeted for demolition

MGM Resorts officials want to demolish the unopened 27-story Harmon Hotel—one of the main components of its brand new $8.5 billion CityCenter development in Las Vegas. In 2008, inspectors found structural work on the Harmon didn’t match building plans submitted to the county, with construction issues focused on improperly placed steel reinforcing bar. In January 2009, MGM scrapped the building’s 200 condo units on the upper floors and stopped the tower at 27 stories, focusing on the Harmon having just 400 hotel rooms. With the Lord Norman Foster-designed building mired in litigation, construction has since been halted on the interior, and the blue-glass tower is essentially a 27-story empty shell.

| Nov 16, 2010

Where can your firm beat the recession? Try any of these 10 places

Wondering where condos and rental apartments will be needed? Where companies are looking to rent office space? Where people will need hotel rooms, retail stores, and restaurants? Newsweek compiled a list of the 10 American cities best situated for economic recovery. The cities fall into three basic groups: Texas, the New Silicon Valleys, and the Heartland Honeys. Welcome to the recovery.

| Nov 16, 2010

Landscape architecture challenges Andrés Duany’s Congress for New Urbanism

Andrés Duany, founder of the Congress for the New Urbanism, adopted the ideas, vision,  and values of the early 20th Century landscape architects/planners John Nolen and Frederick Law Olmsted, Jr., to launch a movement that led to more than 300 new towns, regional plans, and community revitalization project commissions for his firm. However, now that there’s a societal buyer’s remorse about New Urbanism, Duany is coming up against a movement that sees landscape architecture—not architecture—as the design medium more capable of organizing the city and enhancing the urban experience.

| Nov 16, 2010

Just for fun: Words that architects use

If you regularly use such words as juxtaposition, folly, truncated, and articulation, you may be an architect. Architects tend to use words rarely uttered during normal conversations. In fact, 62% of all the words that come out of an architects mouth could be replaced by a simpler and more widely known word, according to this “report.” Review this list of designer words, and once you manage to work them into daily conversation, you’re on your way to becoming a bonafide architect.

| Nov 16, 2010

NFRC approves technical procedures for attachment product ratings

The NFRC Board of Directors has approved technical procedures for the development of U-factor, solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC), and visible transmittance (VT) ratings for co-planar interior and exterior attachment products. The new procedures, approved by unanimous voice vote last week at NFRC’s Fall Membership Meeting in San Francisco, will add co-planar attachments such as blinds and shades to the group’s existing portfolio of windows, doors, skylights, curtain walls, and window film.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Urban Planning

Bridging the gap: How early architect involvement can revolutionize a city’s capital improvement plans

Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs) typically span three to five years and outline future city projects and their costs. While they set the stage, the design and construction of these projects often extend beyond the CIP window, leading to a disconnect between the initial budget and evolving project scope. This can result in financial shortfalls, forcing cities to cut back on critical project features.



Libraries

Reasons to reinvent the Midcentury academic library

DLR Group's Interior Design Leader Gretchen Holy, Assoc. IIDA, shares the idea that a designer's responsibility to embrace a library’s history, respect its past, and create an environment that will serve student populations for the next 100 years.

halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021