flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Dual, often incompatible, management systems add work and cost to projects

AEC Tech

Dual, often incompatible, management systems add work and cost to projects

A new survey finds that contractors and owners differ about the urgency of getting to single, seamless platforms.


By John Caulfield, Senior Editor | September 27, 2019

A national survey of contractors and building owners finds a large portion of respondents unhappy about how data are shared by project teams. Charts: e-Builder and Dodge Data & Analysis

A new survey of building owners and contractors highlights the challenges of managing construction projects when software applications lack automated data exchange processes.

The report, “Connecting Owners and Contractors: How Technology Drives Connected Construction,” was released by e-Builder, a Trimble Company, and Dodge Data & Analytics. It is based on responses to online surveys last Spring from 112 contracting companies and 98 building owners. Nearly three-quarters of the contractor respondents identify themselves as GCs. Sixty-nine percent of the owners operate within the public sector, and most focus on education, government, or healthcare projects.

Among these companies, 57% of owners and 52% of contractors say they use Project Management Information Systems (PMIS). However, these systems often are not compatible: only 16% of contractors say that an owner’s PMIS is the same as their own, and only 14% say they can integrate the two systems. But owners appear to have the upper hand here, as seven out of 10 owner-respondents with PMIS require contractors to use the owner’s system. More than half of these owners deploy their systems on more than half of their projects.

Consequently, about two-fifths of contractors say they end up using the owners’ systems and their own, leading to double data entry that, the survey found, has a negative impact on worker productivity, workflow, accuracy, decision making, and scheduling.

The survey finds that most owners insist that their PMIS prevail as the system used. That demand can present more work for contractors that also prefer to use their own systems. 

 

More than one-third of contractors say they use the owner’s PMIS exclusively. The risk for contractors that use an owner’s PMIS, according to the survey, include increased costs, lack of proper documentation in the event of a claim, lack of project performance data and reports.

The disconnect, however, is that contractors see all these risks as being much bigger problems than owners do. Only two fifths of contractors are satisfied with the status quo, compared to nearly three fifths of owners. Contractors, though, also tend to be more neutral than owners about these systems’ incompatibilities, apparently accepting inefficiencies as part of doing business.

The irony is that there’s consensus among contractors and owners about, and a high level of satisfaction with, the overall benefits of using PMIS to handle such things as submittals and RFIs. Sixty-five percent of owners and 51% of contractors see high/very high value in a single platform that all parties use on projects for data management. “Both believe that creating a more seamless workflow for their processes would increase the value they receive,” the report states.

Contractors and owners agree that there's value in managing projects using a single, seamless system. 

 

The report quotes Aaron Haas, Executive Vice President and construction manager with Howard Hughes, that within such a seamless scenario “there should be no miscommunication about cost, change orders, RFIs, submittals; it’s all one unified system.” Contractors in general believe that the key to accelerating this project process, and to getting paid quicker, is better data exchange.

But the industry has a ways to go to reach that plateau. The survey finds that 73% of contractors still use manual methods to measure project progress on more than half of their jobs, and 49% of pros subjectively estimate project progress on more than half of their jobs.

\More than a quarter of contractors don’t use a PMIS because they think it’s too expensive, and 23% think it’s too complicated. But 58% expressed a moderate to higher interest in using a system within the next three years.

Tags

Related Stories

Green | Mar 9, 2020

BuroHappold commits to all new building projects achieving net-zero carbon by 2030

The engineering firm also launched a long-term partnership with ILFI.

Architects | Mar 2, 2020

Two ‘firsts’ for Sasaki and LEO A DALY

Following an industry trend, the firms hire chiefs of technology and sustainability, respectively.

AEC Tech | Feb 22, 2020

Investor interest in the built environment not quite as avid in 2019

Builtworlds’ annual list of venture deals led by workspace providers.

AEC Tech | Feb 13, 2020

Exclusive research: Download the final report for BD+C's Giants 300 Technology and Innovation Study

This survey of 130 of the nation's largest architecture, engineering, and construction firms tracks the state of AEC technology adoption and innovation initiatives at the AEC Giants.

AEC Tech | Feb 5, 2020

BIM London: A glimpse of BIM discussions across the pond

Digital twin, ISO standards, blockchain, and data were the hot topics at the recent The Digital World: BIM event.

AEC Tech | Jan 16, 2020

EC firms with a clear ‘digital roadmap’ should excel in 2020

Deloitte, in new report, lays out a risk mitigation strategy that relies on tech.

Green | Jan 10, 2020

How the new EC3 tool raises the bar on collective action

Nearly 50 AEC industry organizations partnered to develop the groundbreaking Embodied Carbon in Construction Calculator.

AEC Tech | Jan 8, 2020

Thornton Tomasetti launches open-source embodied carbon measurement tool

Beacon is a Revit plugin that generates a comprehensive data visualization of a project’s embodied carbon.

| Dec 18, 2019

Reconsidering construction robotics

After decades when experts predicted that robots would become more prevalent on construction sites, it would appear that the industry has finally reached that point where necessity, aspiration, and investment are colliding. 

Big Data | Dec 4, 2019

AEC data's coming out party

AEC firms are finally putting to use project information they’ve been storing in their computers for years.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


3D Printing

3D-printed construction milestones take shape in Tennessee and Texas

Two notable 3D-printed projects mark milestones in the new construction technique of “printing” structures with specialized concrete. In Athens, Tennessee, Walmart hired Alquist 3D to build a 20-foot-high store expansion, one of the largest freestanding 3D-printed commercial concrete structures in the U.S. In Marfa, Texas, the world’s first 3D-printed hotel is under construction at an existing hotel and campground site.



halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021