flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Energy efficiency ratings not reflecting true energy use

Codes and Standards

Energy efficiency ratings not reflecting true energy use

Highest rated U.K. buildings are less efficient than lower rated ones.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | February 7, 2022
Energy efficiency rating

Courtesy Pixabay

Recent findings from the Better Buildings Partnership raise serious questions about the efficacy of energy efficiency ratings used in the United Kingdom.

The study found that buildings that have received the highest rating—an A Energy Performance Certificate—use more energy than some of their peers rated C, D, E, or F. The analysis of self-reported energy data in 2020 for more than 1,100 commercial properties found that the median energy intensity for all B-rated buildings is higher than for C-rated buildings.

The disparity between how buildings are designed and their actual greenhouse gas emissions is widespread in the U.K. The findings are in line with past evidence that green building certifications based on predicted energy use don’t necessarily translate to energy savings in the field.

Some studies have found that LEED certification yields better energy efficiency, but others have found that certified buildings use more energy than non-certified buildings. The U.S. Green Building Council maintains that its own research shows certified buildings are overall more efficient.

Part of the explanation for the disparity between ratings systems and real-world results could be due to the limitation of assessments that only predict potential energy efficiency. In practice, building management systems may not be set up or used properly. In addition, people sometimes undo the efficiency design by bringing fans into buildings or installing additional air conditioners.

Related Stories

| Oct 31, 2013

IECC code updates include better lighting controls and new HVAC technology

The proposed new code will increase the mandatory installation of occupancy sensors and daylighting controls to many new types of spaces.

| Oct 31, 2013

Effects of green, white roofs to be compared at Walmart in Oregon

Portland State University will construct a 40,000 sf green roof research site on the top of a new Walmart store in North Portland, Ore., and compare it to a 52,000 sf section of roof with a white membrane.

| Oct 31, 2013

GSA okays Green Globes; USGBC counters forestry industry concerns

Green Globes, a LEED rival, was recently declared to be nearly equal with LEED standards by the General Services Administration.

| Oct 25, 2013

California struggles with updated seismic codes

In California, there are still hundreds of concrete buildings that need reinforcement to bring them up to the new seismic code.

| Oct 24, 2013

Supplement No. 2 to AISC 358-10 Prequalified Moment Connection Standard available for public review

Supplement No. 2 to the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) standard Prequalified Connections for Special and Intermediate Steel Moment Frames for Seismic Applications (AISC 358-10) is now available for public review.

| Oct 24, 2013

Changes in LEED v4 will have large impact on materials manufacturers

Changes to LEED in LEED v4 are so dramatic that they will send ripples into other industries and shift expectations on sustainability reporting and performance far beyond the building industry.

| Oct 24, 2013

D.C. office buildings going green at twice the national average

In 2011, about 33% of new office buildings in the U.S. were built to green standards, but in the nation’s capital that rate has skyrocketed.

| Oct 18, 2013

AGC considers suit over new hiring goals for vets, disabled

The Associated General Contractors of America and the HR Policy Association are reportedly considering taking legal action over the Labor Department's new hiring goals for veterans and disabled people.

| Oct 18, 2013

Cities may be more capable of driving sustainability than nations, experts say

With countries not tackling climate change aggressively, cities are in the best position to drive increased sustainability.

| Oct 8, 2013

Kansas City board OKs $1.6 billion TIF for $4.3 billion redevelopment project

Kansas City’s Tax Increment Financing Commission voted unanimously to forward the Bannister & I-435 TIF Plan to the Kansas City Council for approval.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021