flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Fast-track naval hospital sparks sea change in project delivery [2014 Building Team Awards]

Fast-track naval hospital sparks sea change in project delivery [2014 Building Team Awards]

Through advanced coordination methods and an experimental contract method, the Building Team for Camp Pendleton’s new hospital campus sets a new standard for project delivery.


By David Barista, Editor-in-Chief | July 8, 2014
The Naval Hospital at Camp Pendleton replaces an outmoded hospital on the base.
The Naval Hospital at Camp Pendleton replaces an outmoded hospital on the base. The 500,000-sf facility has 96 outpatient proced

In a Building Team Awards competition that was heavy with high-quality healthcare projects, including four eventual winners, the Naval Hospital at Camp Pendleton (NHCP) stood out, according to the awards judges. The jury commended the Building Team for executing an extremely large and complex program under an aggressive schedule and experimental design-build contracting method—all while beating the initial budget by nearly 19%.  

“On top of that, this project has a strong environmental story,” said Building Team Awards judge Susan Heinking, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP EB O+M, Sustainability Leader and Vice President with VOA. On track for LEED Gold, the facility outperforms baseline ASHRAE energy standards by 30%, thanks to its daylight-rich interior scheme, 36,000-sf vegetated roof, and 170 kW photovoltaic solar panel array for domestic hot water.

The massive, one-million-sf campus was completed in just 34 months, a full six months ahead of the original schedule and two years faster than any previous NAVFAC hospital project. The Building Team also came in more than $100 million under budget, with less than 2% contractor-requested change orders, zero lost-time incidents, and zero rework needed due to government noncompliance.

The scope of the project entailed building a 500,000-sf hospital with 60 inpatient beds for medical surgery, labor/delivery, post-partum, and intensive care, as well as 96 procedure rooms, 205 exam rooms, and 10 operating rooms; a central utility plant with 3,100 tons of cooling and redundant utility systems; a 1,500-space parking facility; and 1,000 surface parking spaces.

PLATINUM AWARD

Project summary
Naval Hospital at Camp Pendleton
Oceanside, Calif.

BUILDING TEAM
Submitting firms: Clark Construction Group, McCarthy Building Cos. (joint venture design-build contractor)
Owner: NAVFAC Southwest
Design architect: HDR Architecture
Architect of record: HKS
Interior architect: Young and Co.
Structural engineer: KPFF Consulting Engineers
Mechanical engineer: TMAD Taylor and Gaines
Electrical engineer: exp.
Civil engineer: BergerABAM

GENERAL INFORMATION
Size: 1,000,000 gsf
Construction cost: $447.3 million
Construction: September 2010 to September 2013
Delivery method: Design-build

Funded through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the project had to be completed in record time (by Navy standards) in order to meet the ARRA requirements. It meant the Building Team would have to compress the project schedule from the typical five- to seven-year time frame to just 40 months—a goal that was ultimately bested by six months. 

To expedite the schedule and start construction early, the project team developed a phased-design approach—a first for NAVFAC. The team worked alongside the client to identify critical path activities available for early starts, and eventually divided the project into six design packages. 

This approach slashed several weeks off the project schedule. For instance, by sequencing the structural package as one of the first to be reviewed and approved, the hospital’s foundation work kicked off two weeks early. And siphoning a portion of the civil design into an early package facilitated the relocation of two high-voltage transmission lines, which enabled the team to clear the way for an early start of mass grading.

BREAKTHROUGH TURNKEY PROJECT DELIVERY

In a first for the federal government, the design-build team, under a turnkey contracting method, was responsible for not only designing and building the campus, but planning, procuring, and installing all medical equipment, furniture, and artwork, as well as training the hospital staff on the equipment. From the MRI units and blood analyzers to the patient beds and operating room integration, the Building Team was responsible for all aspects of delivery: design, planning, equipment selection, procurement, installation, training, and warranties.

Under the contract, the design-build team—led by Clark Construction Group and McCarthy Building Cos., with HDR Architecture and HKS on the design side—worked hand in hand with NAVFAC to evaluate, select, and coordinate more than 20,000 pieces of equipment for the complex. Every piece of equipment was scrutinized to determine the greatest value to the client, based on life cycle cost, maintenance contracts, model options, and competitive offerings. 

 


The massive campus was completed in just 34 months, a full six months ahead of the original schedule and two years faster than any previous NAVFAC hospital project. A pocket courtyard adds to the healing environment. Photo: LaCasse Photography

 

Once the design was finalized, the team worked closely with NAVFAC to understand its funding schedule, and with the equipment manufacturers to develop a procurement schedule. The goal was to delay final equipment selections to ensure the latest technology, without impacting construction or requiring rework. After the client settled on specific equipment, Clark/McCarthy secured a purchase order from the manufacturer, coordinated lead times with the construction schedule, and incorporated just-in-time delivery to the site, which eliminated the need for temporary warehousing.

5D BIM MODEL PAYS OFF

From the project’s inception, the team worked entirely in three dimensions to design and coordinate the hospital, including its civil infrastructure, building superstructure, envelope, building systems, and interior spaces. 

During design development, the model helped the team accurately determine the budget and constructability. The model was linked to the project’s cost-loaded CPM schedule to produce a 5D tool (3D geometry, time, cost) that automatically adjusted when changes were made.

Using the model, the team prefabricated numerous materials and components, including mechanical systems, window and exterior framing assemblies, ductwork, piping, casework, pneumatic tube system, and electrical distribution systems. 

 


Navy Medicine West personnel were integrated into the project team to provide valuable counsel on how to design and build the most functional spaces for hospital staff. The team used BIM to produce virtual mockups, in conjunction with physical mockups, for a half-dozen major medical spaces. The digital layouts helped coordinate all in-wall and overhead MEP and mechanical spaces, doors, and stud locations, as well as provide tools for early validation by the clinical staff. Photo: LaCasse Photography

 

 
The team also produced virtual mockups for a half-dozen major medical spaces. Working ahead of, and in conjunction with, on-site physical mockups, the digital layouts helped coordinate all in-wall and overhead MEP and mechanical spaces, doors, and stud locations, as well as provide tools for early validation by the clinical staff.

From the successful implementation of an experimental turnkey contract method to the use of 5D BIM for advanced collaboration, the Naval Hospital at Camp Pendleton will serve as model for federal healthcare facilities delivery for years to come.

Related Stories

Designers | Sep 13, 2016

5 trends propelling a new era of food halls

Food halls have not only become an economical solution for restauranteurs and chefs experiencing skyrocketing retail prices and rents in large cities, but they also tap into our increased interest in gourmet locally sourced food, writes Gensler's Toshi Kasai.

AEC Tech | Sep 6, 2016

Innovation intervention: How AEC firms are driving growth through R&D programs

AEC firms are taking a page from the tech industry, by infusing a deep commitment to innovation and disruption into their cultural DNA.

Office Buildings | Sep 2, 2016

Eight-story digital installation added as part of ESI Design’s renovation of Denver’s Wells Fargo Center

The crown jewel of a three-year makeover project, the LED columns bring the building’s lobby to life.

| Sep 1, 2016

TRANSIT GIANTS: A ranking of the nation's top transit sector design and construction firms

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, Perkins+Will, Skanska USA, Webcor Builders, Jacobs, and STV top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest transit sector AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.

| Sep 1, 2016

INDUSTRIAL GIANTS: A ranking of the nation's top industrial design and construction firms

Stantec, BRPH, Fluor Corp., Walbridge, Jacobs, and AECOM top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest industrial sector AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.

| Sep 1, 2016

HOTEL SECTOR GIANTS: A ranking of the nation's top hotel sector design and construction firms

Gensler, HKS, Turner Construction Co., The Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., Jacobs, and JBA Consulting Engineers top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest hotel sector AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.

| Sep 1, 2016

CULTURAL SECTOR GIANTS: A ranking of the nation's top cultural sector design and construction firms

Gensler, Perkins+Will, PCL Construction Enterprises, Turner Construction Co., AECOM, and WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest cultural sector AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.

| Sep 1, 2016

COURTHOUSE GIANTS: A ranking of the nation's top courthouse design and construction firms

DLR Group, NBBJ, Hensel Phelps, Sundt Construction, AECOM, and Dewberry top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest courthouse sector AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.

Airports | Aug 31, 2016

Aircraft manufacturing facility innovation from The Austin Company

Austin’s many innovations contributed to the success of our clients by enabling them to operate in more efficient environments, optimize the flexibility of their operations, and meet aggressive schedules.

| Aug 30, 2016

CONVENTION CENTER GIANTS: A ranking of the nation's top convention center sector design and construction firms

Gensler, LMN Architects, AECOM, Turner Construction Co., and WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest convention center sector AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Urban Planning

Bridging the gap: How early architect involvement can revolutionize a city’s capital improvement plans

Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs) typically span three to five years and outline future city projects and their costs. While they set the stage, the design and construction of these projects often extend beyond the CIP window, leading to a disconnect between the initial budget and evolving project scope. This can result in financial shortfalls, forcing cities to cut back on critical project features.



Libraries

Reasons to reinvent the Midcentury academic library

DLR Group's Interior Design Leader Gretchen Holy, Assoc. IIDA, shares the idea that a designer's responsibility to embrace a library’s history, respect its past, and create an environment that will serve student populations for the next 100 years.

halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021