In the $90 billion U.S. office construction sector, Class A and Class A+ properties are the darlings of every major metro market. Owners and developers of these amenity-rich, high-performance buildings are competing to lure top-notch companies willing to pay the most lucrative lease rates—and to keep them there long-term.
There’s certainly plenty of money to be made in building and rehabbing Class A office buildings. But what about their less-flashy counterparts, Class B and Class C properties?
A new Urban Land Institute report, researched in partnership with the Rocky Mountain Institute and the Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA), suggests that there is significant “hidden value” waiting to be unlocked by owners of Class B/C properties—and plenty of work for AEC firms that cater to these segments of the office market.
For myriad reasons, these properties are woefully outdated and in serious need of a tune-up to meet baseline energy efficiency standards. The ULI report found that even the simplest of energy efficiency measures—low- and no-cost tactics such as upgrading general office illumination to LED fixtures, optimizing HVAC schedules and setpoints, performing routine preventative maintenance, and engaging tenants in occupant behavior measures—could net an immediate 15% savings in energy costs.
Larger capital investments—such as improvements to the building envelope and roof system, or installation of high-efficiency building systems, sensors/controls, or solar panels—could slash energy use by 35% or more, with paybacks in the three-year range. “That can reduce a property’s operating expenses by $0.26 to $0.61 per square foot, increase net operating income by 1.9% to 4.3%, and boost property value by approximately $4 to $8 per square foot,” said the authors.
Why haven’t more Class B/C property owners taken steps to improve the energy performance of their buildings? The report pinpoints three primary reasons: limited working capital to pay for project costs, inadequate staff capacity to implement these measures, and a lack of priority versus other business activities.
Furthermore, by successfully instituting a green lease program, owners can recoup a sizable portion of the initial investment, which would further improve the financial outcomes for the property.
If all of this is so elementary, as the report outlines, why haven’t more Class B/C property owners taken steps to improve the energy performance of their buildings? The report pinpoints three primary reasons: limited working capital to pay for project costs, inadequate staff capacity to implement these measures, and a lack of priority versus other business activities.
“Staff working at Class B/C buildings wear multiple hats. Rarely do they have dedicated third-party management or building engineering staff with time to focus on identifying, championing, and implementing energy efficiency efforts,” said the authors.
The report offers a roadmap for getting started.
For a free PDF download of the ULI report, “Unlocking Hidden Value in Class B/C Office Buildings,” visit BDCnetwork.com/ClassBC.
Related Stories
| Sep 13, 2010
Triple-LEED for Engineering Firm's HQ
With more than 250 LEED projects in the works, Enermodal Engineering is Canada's most prolific green building consulting firm. In 2007, with the firm outgrowing its home office in Kitchener, Ont., the decision was made go all out with a new green building. The goal: triple Platinum for New Construction, Commercial Interiors, and Existing Buildings: O&M.
| Aug 11, 2010
CTBUH changes height criteria; Burj Dubai height increases, others decrease
The Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (CTBUH)—the international body that arbitrates on tall building height and determines the title of “The World’s Tallest Building”—has announced a change to its height criteria, as a reflection of recent developments with several super-tall buildings.
| Aug 11, 2010
BIG's 'folded façade' design takes first-prize in competition for China energy company headquarters
Copenhagen-based architect BIG, in collaboration with ARUP and Transsolar, was awarded first-prize in an international competition to design Shenzhen International Energy Mansion, the regional headquarters for the Shenzhen Energy Company.
| Aug 11, 2010
Jacobs, Arup, AECOM top BD+C's ranking of the nation's 75 largest international design firms
A ranking of the Top 75 International Design Firms based on Building Design+Construction's 2009 Giants 300 survey. For more Giants 300 rankings, visit http://www.BDCnetwork.com/Giants
| Aug 11, 2010
New air-conditioning design standard allows for increased air speed to cool building interiors
Building occupants, who may soon feel cooler from increased air movement, can thank a committee of building science specialists. The committee in charge of ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55 - Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy—after months of study and discussion--has voted recently to allow increased air speed as an option for cooling building interiors. In lay terms, increased air speed is the equivalent of turning up the fan.
| Aug 11, 2010
Architecture Billings Index flat in May, according to AIA
After a slight decline in April, the Architecture Billings Index was up a tenth of a point to 42.9 in May. As a leading economic indicator of construction activity, the ABI reflects the approximate nine to twelve month lag time between architecture billings and construction spending. Any score above 50 indicates an increase in billings.
| Aug 11, 2010
Free-span solar energy system installed at REM Eyewear headquarters
The first cable-suspended free-span solar energy system was completed today over the REM Eyewear headquarters parking lot in Sun Valley, Calif. The patented, cable-supported photovoltaic system created by P4P Energy is expected to generate 40,877 kilowatt-hours of renewable electricity per year, enough to power five to six single family homes and to prevent 1.5 million pounds of carbon from being released into the atmosphere.
