The occasional pleasant surprise is always nice, but an unanticipated tornado is rarely greeted with enthusiasm. Most of us prefer a relatively predictable future with adequate warning when the occasional storm heads our way.
Unfortunately, our current political drama has made our healthcare clients view the future of their business environment in much the same way most of us approach the latest weather report. We want to stay abreast of the latest news, but what we hear is greeted with skepticism.
Just as very few of us would bet a significant amount of our wealth on the reliability of weather predictions, our healthcare clients are struggling with how best to approach long-term planning when our national healthcare policy seems to change with the nightly news cycle.
Within this rancorous political environment and the uncertainty that it imposes on the healthcare industry, architects are asking themselves how they can best serve their healthcare clients with decisions that have significant cost and long-term implications.
Our advice to fellow architects and clients alike is to focus on what you know and avoid speculative investments.
We know, for example, that most of the nation’s healthcare infrastructure is aging, with many hospital campuses occupied by buildings that are ill-suited to meet the demands of modern healthcare.
We know that we have an aging Baby Boomer population that will require care and treatment for chronic problems that accompany old age. We also know that they are living longer than their parents did.
We’re aware, too, that the demographic and financial composition of the country is evolving. We know that many of the rural areas of the country are poorly served and lack adequate healthcare services. We also know that many urban areas have inadequate or poorly distributed trauma services.
These realities provide direction for where healthcare providers might make meaningful and defensible investments—at least until the political seas calm and the way forward is a bit more predictable.
For healthcare architects, these realities also offer potential opportunities for marketing strategies that can be tailored toward the types of projects that might surface during this stressful period. Projects could include the modernization of existing facilities, conversions from semi-private rooms to private rooms, or energy system upgrades that reduce operating costs.
More proactively, healthcare planners and designers might consider bundling services that are directed toward strategically assisting their clients with assessing opportunities within their existing healthcare campuses—opportunities that could improve operational efficiency, space utilization, and throughput.
Architects may be as ill-equipped to resolve the healthcare policy turmoil as everyone else, but healthcare designers are very well positioned to assist their clients strategically with insight and creativity—not only to navigate the stormy waters that are currently roiling the industry, but also to make meaningful interventions that provide long-term value to the communities they and their healthcare clients serve.
Related Stories
| Sep 9, 2014
Using Facebook to transform workplace design
As part of our ongoing studies of how building design influences human behavior in today’s social media-driven world, HOK’s workplace strategists had an idea: Leverage the power of social media to collect data about how people feel about their workplaces and the type of spaces they need to succeed.
| Sep 7, 2014
Ranked: Top state government sector AEC firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]
PCL Construction, Stantec, and AECOM head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest state government design and construction firms, as reported in the 2014 Giants 300 Report.
| Sep 7, 2014
Hybrid healthcare: Revamping inefficient inpatient units to revenue-producing outpatient care
It's happening at community hospitals all over America: leadership teams are looking for ways to maintain margins by managing underutilized and non-revenue producing space. GS&P's David Magner explores nontraditional healthcare models.
| Sep 7, 2014
Behind the scenes of integrated project delivery — successful tools and applications
The underlying variables and tools used to manage collaboration between teams is ultimately the driving for success with IPD, writes CBRE Healthcare's Megan Donham.
| Sep 4, 2014
Hospital CEOs, architects sound off on state of healthcare design
Healthcare construction will continue to feel the effects of radical changes in the delivery of care, according to healthcare leaders attending the annual Summer Leadership Summit of the American College of Healthcare Architects and the AIA Academy of Architecture for Health.
| Sep 3, 2014
Ranked: Top local government sector AEC firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]
STV, HOK, and Turner top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest local government design and construction firms, as reported in the 2014 Giants 300 Report.
| Sep 3, 2014
New designation launched to streamline LEED review process
The LEED Proven Provider designation is designed to minimize the need for additional work during the project review process.
| Sep 2, 2014
Ranked: Top green building sector AEC firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]
AECOM, Gensler, and Turner top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest green design and construction firms.
| Sep 1, 2014
Ranked: Top federal government sector AEC firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]
Clark Group, Fluor, and HOK top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest federal government design and construction firms, as reported in the 2014 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 26, 2014
6 lessons from a true IPD project: George Washington University Hospital
In its latest blog post, Skanska shares tips and takeaways from the firm's second true integrated project delivery project.
