flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Green initiative may scuttle high-rise projects in Berkeley, California, critics charge

Green initiative may scuttle high-rise projects in Berkeley, California, critics charge

Measure would mandate LEED Platinum on new high-rise construction


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | June 4, 2014
View of Berkeley and Bay from Claremont Canyon. Photo: Urban via Wikimedia Commo
View of Berkeley and Bay from Claremont Canyon. Photo: Urban via Wikimedia Commons

Volunteers in Berkeley, Calif., are collecting signatures for the “Green Downtown & Public Commons Initiative,” a controversial measure that critics charge would halt some development in the city. The initiative has higher green standards and less flexible design guidelines—factors that developers say could stop two major projects, a proposed 180-foot high hotel and a 17-story apartment tower.

The initiative would mandate that developers planning a project taller than 60 feet use the “Green Pathways” provision of the Downtown Area Plan. This rule—currently optional—says that a developer can provide a higher level of community benefits in exchange for a fast-track approval process. Under Green Pathways, developers have to make structures LEED Platinum rather than LEED Gold; build more parking; include spaces for bicycles, electric cars and the handicapped; pay prevailing wages to construction and hotel workers; and make sure that half of a project’s construction workers are Berkeley residents.

The financial proposition for a high-rise hotel in Berkeley is fragile, according to a representative of the proposed hotel, and the new initiative would require additional setbacks and restrictions that would make it impossible to have enough rooms on each floor to make the project viable. The initiative calls for a minimum 15-foot setback, but the hotel developer says the structure must have a 10-foot setback to have enough space per floor.

City Councilman Jesse Arreguín, who supports the measure, says it is not intended to stop development, but is a way of getting developers to contribute more benefits to the downtown area.

(http://www.berkeleyside.com/2014/05/14/would-new-green-initiative-kill-two-downtown-high-rises/comment-page-1/)

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Nov 18, 2020

Commissioning study finds median energy savings of 3% to 16%

Berkeley Lab examines results of commissioning across building types.

Codes and Standards | Nov 17, 2020

Midtown Manhattan’s empty offices could be converted to affordable housing

Advocates envision idle offices re-zoned to alleviate housing crisis.

Codes and Standards | Nov 16, 2020

New concrete detailing manual includes downloadable CAD files

American Concrete Institute document contains guidance on codes for structural concrete.

Codes and Standards | Nov 12, 2020

California rent control measure defeated

Golden State voters reject Proposition 21.

Codes and Standards | Nov 10, 2020

Researchers and industry leaders will form national institute for AI in construction

Goal is to identify high-impact areas for application in design and construction.

Codes and Standards | Nov 6, 2020

Jobsite injuries in New York City decline 20% since 2017

Safety training cited as a cause of improvement.

Codes and Standards | Nov 4, 2020

Commercial building owners having tougher time securing insurance policies and renewals

Insurers’ fears of civil unrest in wake of election prompt builder’s risk coverage moratoriums.

Codes and Standards | Nov 4, 2020

Turn rooftops into revenue generators with solar arrays

Lease or ownership models for PVs make more sense than ever.

Codes and Standards | Nov 3, 2020

The argument against gas stoves includes degraded indoor air quality

Asthma seems to be aggravated by cooking with flame.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021