flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Inefficient supply chains, outdated project delivery systems hamper construction investment

Codes and Standards

Inefficient supply chains, outdated project delivery systems hamper construction investment

Additional complexity makes it harder to justify, construct physical assets.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | July 8, 2022
Manufacturing Plant
Courtesy Pixabay.

Constructing and justifying the cost of physical assets such as a manufacturing plant is much more difficult than it was decades ago, according to a report by Steffen Fuchs, senior partner with McKinsey & Company.

Inflation, rigorous sustainability requirements, and rapid changes in technology and regulations all complicate investment in new construction projects, the report says. “Adding to the complexity, the next generation of assets needs to be “set and forget”: the high cost of building them must be offset by lower operating costs,” Fuchs writes.

Improvements in construction processes and project delivery are especially necessary given that a new wave of “once-in-a-lifetime” capital spending on physical assets will take place between now and 2027. Roughly $130 trillion will pour into projects to decarbonize and renew critical infrastructure, Fuchs writes.

Project leaders typically rely on practices that aim to optimize individual investments, such as a nuclear power plant, an oil refinery, or a pipeline. Cost overruns are typical and costly using this approach. New decarbonization and sustainability investments where groups of similar projects (such as wind farms and solar parks) are delivered repeatedly over a long period of time require much better performance, Fuchs says.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Jan 18, 2022

Greater emphasis on building materials needed to achieve net-zero carbon offices

Engineered wood, straw, and bamboo can be keys to achieving goal.

Codes and Standards | Jan 17, 2022

AISC seeks comments on draft earthquake standard for steel buildings

Includes new limits for cross-sectional slenderness of steel columns based on latest research.

Codes and Standards | Jan 12, 2022

California’s wildfire building code significantly reduces structural loss

As other states consider upgrading their codes, Golden State provides useful model.

Codes and Standards | Jan 12, 2022

Regulator holding back climate-friendly, energy-saving equipment deployment, critics say

Heat pumps, solar power could be made more accessible for low-income communities in Massachusetts.

Codes and Standards | Jan 11, 2022

Cost hikes drive nearly one million renters out of homeownership qualification in 2021

Household income needed to pay a mortgage rose to $62,872 from $55,186.

Codes and Standards | Jan 10, 2022

New ratings services focus on climate risk for homeowners

Efficacy of models used in risk assessment varies.

Codes and Standards | Jan 6, 2022

Virginia contractors having a tough time finding diverse subs to meet state goals

Survey of primes may indicate similar issues at federal level.

Codes and Standards | Jan 5, 2022

Boston drops parking requirements for affordable housing

Measure expected to spur new projects.

Codes and Standards | Jan 4, 2022

Dept. of Energy Better Climate Challenge aims for 50% GHG emission reduction by 2030

Program offers technical assistance and peer-to-peer knowledge sharing.

Codes and Standards | Jan 4, 2022

Architects at New York firm take steps to unionize

Support for unionization reported at two other New York firms.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021