A quick scan of our 41st annual Giants 300 report reveals a wealth of technology and business innovations across every major building sector and industry discipline.
Architecture firms are developing advanced tools and apps—such as HKS’s “Lab in a Bag” sensor network and Perkins+Will’s “Hazel” infrastructure modeling tool—to help improve the design process and enhance outcomes. They’re adopting emerging technologies like AR/VR and computational design at a breakneck pace, and they are tapping into the deluge of project data in new and inventive ways. They’re also reinventing continuing education with hands-on learning opportunities that take CE to the streets.
Engineering firms such as Arup, Glumac, and Thornton Tomasetti are leveraging their in-house expertise to develop products and tools for their design teams, clients, and even the competition. Some of these products, like Glumac’s G Cloud personal environmental control platform, are the first of their kind. Others, such as Thornton Tomasetti’s Hummingbird Kinetics compact mass damper, are fresh takes on time-tested technologies.
Construction firms are leveraging prefabrication, modularization, VDC, gaming, 3D laser scanning, and other progressive tools and processes to minimize risk, speed delivery, and improve quality control on projects. Case in point: Using BIM and prefabrication, Turner Construction was able to execute a complex, 20,000-sf mechanical penthouse piping fitout in a MIT research building in just four months—a third of the time it would have taken using traditional coordination methods, according to the firm.
Terms like “predictive data analytics,” “machine learning,” and “data visualization” are becoming mainstream in the AEC market. Firms are looking outside the industry for specialists in these emerging fields. They’re also beefing up their investment in and resources for in-house R&D and innovation programs, and are creating quasi think tank cultures with a startup-like vibe.
As an industry observer, I’ve been fascinated by this transformation. But it leads me to wonder, Is the race to innovate leading to healthier bottom lines for AEC firms?
While it’s too early to tell for most firms, several companies report financial gains and new business as a direct result of R&D- and innovation-related initiatives. SmithGroupJJR’s Russ Sykes points to the firm’s more progressive culture (kicked off in 2014) as a key reason for its 15% YOY average growth rate—vs. 8% when the firm had a “conservative culture” (more at: BDCnetwork/SGJ). And, as reported last year, Little’s LaceUp mini-grant R&D program has funded more than 40 unique projects, including one—the Center for Building Performance—that is responsible for winning 14 jobs for the A/E firm.
For other firms, the investment in innovation is viewed as a new cost of doing business in the increasingly competitive and chaotic AEC marketplace.
Related Stories
Giants 400 | Aug 11, 2021
BD+C Awards Programs
Entry information and past winners for Building Design+Construction's two major awards programs: 40 Under 40 and Giants 400
University Buildings | Aug 6, 2021
Is air quality the next hot campus amenity?
New research shows that students want to be back on campus, but they—and their parents—are asking more of higher ed institutions.
Giants 400 | Dec 16, 2020
Download a PDF of all 2020 Giants 400 Rankings
This 70-page PDF features AEC firm rankings across 51 building sectors, disciplines, and specialty services.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Science & Technology Facilities Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the S+T sector
HDR, Jacobs, and Turner head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Laboratory Facilities Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. laboratory facilities sector
Affiliated Engineers, HDR, and Skanska top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest laboratory facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Industrial Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. industrial buildings sector
Clayco, Jacobs, and Ware Malcomb top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest industrial buildings sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Convention Center Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. convention center sector
AECOM, Gensler, and Jacobs head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest convention center sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Reconstruction Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. building reconstruction and renovation sector
Gensler, Jacobs, and STO Building Group head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest reconstruction sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 K-12 School Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. K-12 school facilities sector
AECOM, Gilbane, and PBK head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest K-12 school facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Sports Facilities Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. sports facilities sector
Kimley-Horn, Mortenson, and Populous top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest sports facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
