A quick scan of our 41st annual Giants 300 report reveals a wealth of technology and business innovations across every major building sector and industry discipline.
Architecture firms are developing advanced tools and apps—such as HKS’s “Lab in a Bag” sensor network and Perkins+Will’s “Hazel” infrastructure modeling tool—to help improve the design process and enhance outcomes. They’re adopting emerging technologies like AR/VR and computational design at a breakneck pace, and they are tapping into the deluge of project data in new and inventive ways. They’re also reinventing continuing education with hands-on learning opportunities that take CE to the streets.
Engineering firms such as Arup, Glumac, and Thornton Tomasetti are leveraging their in-house expertise to develop products and tools for their design teams, clients, and even the competition. Some of these products, like Glumac’s G Cloud personal environmental control platform, are the first of their kind. Others, such as Thornton Tomasetti’s Hummingbird Kinetics compact mass damper, are fresh takes on time-tested technologies.
Construction firms are leveraging prefabrication, modularization, VDC, gaming, 3D laser scanning, and other progressive tools and processes to minimize risk, speed delivery, and improve quality control on projects. Case in point: Using BIM and prefabrication, Turner Construction was able to execute a complex, 20,000-sf mechanical penthouse piping fitout in a MIT research building in just four months—a third of the time it would have taken using traditional coordination methods, according to the firm.
Terms like “predictive data analytics,” “machine learning,” and “data visualization” are becoming mainstream in the AEC market. Firms are looking outside the industry for specialists in these emerging fields. They’re also beefing up their investment in and resources for in-house R&D and innovation programs, and are creating quasi think tank cultures with a startup-like vibe.
As an industry observer, I’ve been fascinated by this transformation. But it leads me to wonder, Is the race to innovate leading to healthier bottom lines for AEC firms?
While it’s too early to tell for most firms, several companies report financial gains and new business as a direct result of R&D- and innovation-related initiatives. SmithGroupJJR’s Russ Sykes points to the firm’s more progressive culture (kicked off in 2014) as a key reason for its 15% YOY average growth rate—vs. 8% when the firm had a “conservative culture” (more at: BDCnetwork/SGJ). And, as reported last year, Little’s LaceUp mini-grant R&D program has funded more than 40 unique projects, including one—the Center for Building Performance—that is responsible for winning 14 jobs for the A/E firm.
For other firms, the investment in innovation is viewed as a new cost of doing business in the increasingly competitive and chaotic AEC marketplace.
Related Stories
| Sep 1, 2016
COURTHOUSE GIANTS: A ranking of the nation's top courthouse design and construction firms
DLR Group, NBBJ, Hensel Phelps, Sundt Construction, AECOM, and Dewberry top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest courthouse sector AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 30, 2016
CONVENTION CENTER GIANTS: A ranking of the nation's top convention center sector design and construction firms
Gensler, LMN Architects, AECOM, Turner Construction Co., and WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest convention center sector AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
BIM and Information Technology | Aug 30, 2016
BIM GIANTS: A ranking of the nation's top BIM design and construction firms
HOK, Perkins+Will, Turner Construction Co., The Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., Jacobs, and Thornton Tomasetti top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest BIM AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 19, 2016
RECONSTRUCTION GIANTS: Facelifts give buildings new identities, even as they keep a few wrinkles
Reconstruction is always a balancing act between the client’s pro forma and what the building needs to be vibrant again.
| Aug 19, 2016
Top 70 Reconstruction Engineering Firms
Jacobs, Robins & Morton, and The Boldt Company top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest reconstruction sector engineering and E/A firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 19, 2016
Top 110 Reconstruction Construction Firms
Gilbane Building Co., Turner Construction Co., and The Whiting-Turner Contracting Co. top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest reconstruction sector construction and construction management firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 19, 2016
Top 130 Reconstruction Architecture Firms
The Beck Group, Stantec, and IMC Consruction top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest reconstruction sector architecture and A/E firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 18, 2016
LOCAL GOVERNMENT GIANTS: A ranking of the nation’s top design and construction firms in local sector work
HOK, Stantec, Turner Construction Co.,Clark Group, AECOM and STV top Building Design+Construction’s annual rankings of the nation’s largest local government sector AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 18, 2016
STATE GOVERNMENT GIANTS: A ranking of the nation’s top design and construction firms in state sector work
CannonDesign, Stantec, Turner Construction Co.,Mortensen Construction, WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff and AECOM top Building Design+Construction’s annual rankings of the nation’s largest state government sector AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 18, 2016
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GIANTS: A ranking of the nation’s top design and construction firms in federal sector work
Page, EYP, Fluor Corp.,BL Harbert International, and AECOM top Building Design+Construction’s annual rankings of the nation’s largest federal government sector AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
