Using prefabricated elements in the construction of the new Saint Joseph Hospital in Denver—scheduled to open Dec. 13—cut 72 workdays off the construction schedule and resulted in $4.3 million in savings, according to a study by University of Colorado Boulder engineers.
The study, by Matthew Morris and doctoral student Eric Antillon, both of the Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, is one of the first to try and quantify the full costs and benefits of using prefabricated elements in a large-scale construction project. The study was done in partnership with Mortenson construction, which built the new 831,000-square-foot Saint Joseph Hospital.
Developers often choose prefabrication to save time on a project. But because the process of building a unit — like a bathroom or an exterior wall panel — off site can be more expensive up front, due largely to the cost of transporting the finished products to the job site, the overall financial benefits haven’t been well understood.
“The direct cost of the actual units is more expensive — in this case 6 percent more expensive — but the cost savings come from indirect costs related to time savings,” said Morris, an instructor of construction engineering and management. “If you save three months on the schedule, that’s three months when you don’t have to pay for all the things you need to run a job site. This reduces your cost of big-ticket items such as supervision, equipment and your field office.”
For the Saint Joseph Hospital, Mortenson construction chose to prefabricate the exterior wall panels, the bathroom pods, the headwalls in patient rooms, and the utilities that run above hospital corridors by bundling them into prebuilt racks.
Prefabrication is an especially efficient technique in hospitals or any large building where the same type of unit has to be built over and over again, such as dorms or barracks, Morris said. At the Saint Joseph hospital, the need to have hospital rooms with standard equipment and private bathrooms allowed Mortenson to prefabricate 440 bathroom units and 376 patient room headwalls.
“This isn’t the solution for every project,” Morris said. “It takes a particular type of project with repetitive work and an owner and a design team that are willing to be completely onboard.”
Aside from allowing a project to be completed more quickly, prefabricating units offsite can also improve the safety of the job site by decreasing the number of different tradespeople who need to work in the building at any one time, reducing elevated work and providing a controlled environment.
For example, when utilities are traditionally installed in hospital corridors, a number of different subcontractors have to install cables, air ducts, piping and drywall overhead. Aside from the difficulty of working above your head, this causes congestion in heavily used hallways that can lead to accidents. In all, Morris and Antillon calculated that using prefabricated utility racks in the corridors along with other prefabricated units avoided seven safety incidents on the job site.
Even with the impressive cost benefits calculated in the study, Morris said it may be possible for builders like Mortenson to save even more time in the future by perfecting the sequence of work. In the case of the Saint Joseph Hospital, some prefabricated elements moved the project forward so quickly, that the workers responsible for the next phase of the project weren’t always ready to immediately get started.
It may also make sense in the future to only partially prefabricate some units before installation, which could help the workflow, Morris said.
“Fine-tuning is the next step,” he said. “Now we know that prefabrication saves time and money and increases quality and safety. The next steps include developing best practices, training project teams and continuing to drive out inefficiencies.”
Related Stories
Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022
Top 150 University Architecture + AE Firms for 2022
Gensler, CannonDesign, SmithGroup, and Perkins and Will top the ranking of the nation's largest university sector architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022
Top 90 Construction Management Firms for 2022
CBRE, Alfa Tech, Jacobs, and Hill International head the rankings of the nation's largest construction management (as agent) and program/project management firms for nonresidential and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022
Top 200 Contractors for 2022
Turner Construction, STO Building Group, Whiting-Turner, and DPR Construction top the ranking of the nation's largest general contractors, CM at risk firms, and design-builders for nonresidential buildings and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022
Top 45 Engineering Architecture Firms for 2022
Jacobs, AECOM, WSP, and Burns & McDonnell top the rankings of the nation's largest engineering architecture (EA) firms for nonresidential buildings and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022
Top 80 Engineering Firms for 2022
Kimley-Horn, Tetra Tech, Langan, and NV5 head the rankings of the nation's largest engineering firms for nonresidential buildings and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Aug 21, 2022
Top 110 Architecture/Engineering Firms for 2022
Stantec, HDR, HOK, and Skidmore, Owings & Merrill top the rankings of the nation's largest architecture engineering (AE) firms for nonresidential and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Aug 20, 2022
Top 180 Architecture Firms for 2022
Gensler, Perkins and Will, HKS, and Perkins Eastman top the rankings of the nation's largest architecture firms for nonresidential and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Aug 19, 2022
2022 Giants 400 Report: Tracking the nation's largest architecture, engineering, and construction firms
Now 46 years running, Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report rankings the largest architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. This year a record 519 AEC firms participated in BD+C's Giants 400 report. The final report includes more than 130 rankings across 25 building sectors and specialty categories.
Daylighting | Aug 18, 2022
Lisa Heschong on 'Thermal and Visual Delight in Architecture'
Lisa Heschong, FIES, discusses her books, "Thermal Delight in Architecture" and "Visual Delight in Architecture," with BD+C's Rob Cassidy.
| Aug 8, 2022
Mass timber and net zero design for higher education and lab buildings
When sourced from sustainably managed forests, the use of wood as a replacement for concrete and steel on larger scale construction projects has myriad economic and environmental benefits that have been thoroughly outlined in everything from academic journals to the pages of Newsweek.