flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

In the NIL era, colleges and universities are stepping up their sports facilities game

Sports and Recreational Facilities

In the NIL era, colleges and universities are stepping up their sports facilities game

NIL policies have raised expectations among student-athletes about the quality of sports training and performing facilities, in ways that present new opportunities for AEC firms.


By John Caulfield, Senior Editor | October 17, 2024
the renovation of Sam Houston State University’s Mafrige Fieldhouse Locker Room, Photo courtesy PBK
Colleges are upgrading their athletic facilities to meet the rising expectations of student-athletes and to recruit new players. Shown here is the renovation of Sam Houston State University’s Mafrige Fieldhouse Locker Room. Photo courtesy PBK

Since July 1, 2021, student-athletes in most states have had the right to control the use of their names, images, and likenesses (NIL) for marketing and publicity purposes, and be compensated for that usage while maintaining their amateur status to continue playing for their college teams.

This change has led colleges and universities to strike NIL deals with businesses and advertisers, through which individual athletes can negotiate. Booster groups, like alumni associations, have also formed NIL Collectives that raise money from NIL agreements that is made available to students in exchange for using their persona. Sweeter deals can motivate student-athletes to transfer, which complicates teams’ recruiting and roster-building objectives.

NIL policies have raised expectations among student-athletes about the quality of sports training and performing facilities, in ways that present new design, renovation, and construction opportunities for AEC firms with sports practices.

“Schools’ facilities need to be more competitive, and find revenue-generating solutions,” says Sean Plunkett, Managing Principal with PBK Sports, a division of PRK Architects, which has pursued this avenue for higher ed business. He’s seeing more modifications to campus sports venues that create different experiences, such as pay tiers for seating, tailgating, and food and beverage.

On August 22, BD+C interviewed Plunkett and Melvin Robinson, who had recently joined PBK Sports as National Director of Sports Client Engagement. Robinson’s resume includes nearly 15 years with the University of Georgia Athletic Association, with stints as Director of Facilities and Assistant Athletic Director. They had just met with the coaches and staff of a major Big Ten state university, “where football matters,” says Plunkett.

Pictured: Texas A&M University’s remodel of its Davis Center Nutrition Station. Photo courtesy PBK
Pictured: Texas A&M University’s remodel of its Davis Center Nutrition Station. Photo courtesy PBK

Over the past decade, Robinson has watched college sports programs engage in a recruiting arms race, with their athletic facilities as weapons. “It started in the locker room: who has the best pool, the best barber shop? It has all been about flash and pop.” During this period, and especially over the past few years, he’s seen student-athletes evolve into “entrepreneurs,” which can add another layer of stress. College sports programming now includes health, wellness, and financial services to help their athletes handle the pressure.

Student-athletes, he says, have come to expect training facilities to resemble mini versions of ESPN. “You need digital spaces, technology, studios. Hollywood meets higher ed,” Robinson quips. And because college sports, especially football and basketball, are ubiquitous on TV and online platforms, their facilities often define the school’s image for student-athletes and their parents.

“The facilities are a big part of recruiting, enticing, and retaining athletes,” says Robinson.

The cost of new construction or renovation usually isn’t an impediment, says Plunkett, who notes that financing typically comes from ticket sales, donors, and vendors. To help its clients fill gaps in financing, PBK suggests things like seating values, and offering diverse fan experiences both inside and outside the stadium or arena.

Robinson observes that professional sports teams are generally more attentive to the comfort and convenience of their fans, whereas colleges are all about the players. However, pros’ training facilities are catching up. “NIL is leveling the playing field,“ says Robinson.

Related Stories

| Jul 28, 2014

Reconstruction Sector Architecture Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Stantec, HDR, and HOK top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest reconstruction architecture and architecture/engineering firms in the U.S.

| Jul 23, 2014

Meet Acquario Ceará: The giant crustacean-shaped aquarium that's causing concerns

A new aquarium on Brazil's northeastern coast is designed, engineered, constructed and financed by U.S. firms and institutions.

| Jul 23, 2014

Architecture Billings Index up nearly a point in June

AIA reported the June ABI score was 53.5, up from a mark of 52.6 in May.

| Jul 21, 2014

Economists ponder uneven recovery, weigh benefits of big infrastructure [2014 Giants 300 Report]

According to expert forecasters, multifamily projects, the Panama Canal expansion, and the petroleum industry’s “shale gale” could be saving graces for commercial AEC firms seeking growth opportunities in an economy that’s provided its share of recent disappointments.

| Jul 18, 2014

Contractors warm up to new technologies, invent new management schemes [2014 Giants 300 Report]

“UAV.” “LATISTA.” “CMST.” If BD+C Giants 300 contractors have anything to say about it, these new terms may someday be as well known as “BIM” or “LEED.” Here’s a sampling of what Giant GCs and CMs are doing by way of technological and managerial innovation.

| Jul 18, 2014

Top Construction Management Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Jacobs, Barton Malow, Hill International top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest construction management and project management firms in the United States. 

| Jul 18, 2014

Top Contractors [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Turner, Whiting-Turner, Skanska top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest contractors in the United States. 

| Jul 18, 2014

Engineering firms look to bolster growth through new services, technology [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Following solid revenue growth in 2013, the majority of U.S.-based engineering and engineering/architecture firms expect more of the same this year, according to BD+C’s 2014 Giants 300 report. 

| Jul 18, 2014

Top Engineering/Architecture Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Jacobs, AECOM, Parsons Brinckerhoff top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest engineering/architecture firms in the United States.

| Jul 18, 2014

Top Engineering Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Fluor, Arup, Day & Zimmermann top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest engineering firms in the United States.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021