flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

Codes and Standards

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. 


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | April 22, 2015
OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The Construction Industry Safety Coalition will cost the industry $5 billion per year. Image: Morgue File/PenMac

A new report by the Construction Industry Safety Coalition (CISC) found that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) proposed silica standards for U.S. construction industry will cost the industry $5 billion per year. That’s about $4.5 billion per year more than OSHA’s estimate.

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. The proposed rule aims to greatly reduce the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of crystalline silica for the construction industry.

The agency pegged the cost to the construction industry at about $511 million a year. “The OSHA analysis included major errors and omissions that account for the large discrepancies with the CISC report,” according to a statement from the industry group.

The CISC report estimates that about 80% of the cost ($3.9 billion/year) will be direct compliance expenditures by the industry such as additional equipment, labor and record-keeping costs.

The remaining 20% will come from increased prices that the industry will have to pay for construction materials and building products such as concrete block, glass, and roofing shingles. OSHA’s estimates failed to take into account these additional costs, CISC says. The added cost would be passed down to customers, the industry group says.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | May 23, 2019

Austin creates innovative plan to boost affordable housing

Approach includes loosened zoning, incentives for higher density in lower-cost and mixed-income developments.

Codes and Standards | May 20, 2019

Effort launched to develop better process for zero-carbon retrofits in multifamily sector

Rocky Mountain Institute, Dept. of Energy, California Energy Commission join forces.

Codes and Standards | May 20, 2019

Property lenders shouldn’t invest for 30 years in most of Florida, expert warns

Climate ignorance driving some ‘insane’ deals.

Codes and Standards | May 17, 2019

NIMBYism is the biggest multifamily construction barrier

National Apartment Assn. report assesses reasons for difficulty in creating more apartments.

Codes and Standards | May 17, 2019

Dept. of Energy to award up to $33.5 million for advanced construction R&D

Focus is on techniques to reduce energy bills.

Codes and Standards | May 16, 2019

Mixed reviews on targeted tax break for San Francisco neighborhood

“Twitter tax break” may have worsened some of the area’s problems.

Codes and Standards | May 15, 2019

OSHA inspections to increase, says Secretary of Labor

Newly hired inspectors getting up to speed.

Codes and Standards | May 14, 2019

Database records more than 1,360 K-12 school shooting incidents since 1970

Naval Postgraduate School program maps locations nationwide.

Codes and Standards | May 13, 2019

In many cities, downtown housing comes with a hefty premium

Urban core living costs hundreds of thousands more in largest U.S. cities.

Codes and Standards | May 7, 2019

San Francisco plan would require largest commercial buildings to use 100% renewable electricity

First in the U.S. mandate would be phased in from 2022 to 2030.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021