flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

Codes and Standards

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. 


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | April 22, 2015
OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The Construction Industry Safety Coalition will cost the industry $5 billion per year. Image: Morgue File/PenMac

A new report by the Construction Industry Safety Coalition (CISC) found that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) proposed silica standards for U.S. construction industry will cost the industry $5 billion per year. That’s about $4.5 billion per year more than OSHA’s estimate.

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. The proposed rule aims to greatly reduce the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of crystalline silica for the construction industry.

The agency pegged the cost to the construction industry at about $511 million a year. “The OSHA analysis included major errors and omissions that account for the large discrepancies with the CISC report,” according to a statement from the industry group.

The CISC report estimates that about 80% of the cost ($3.9 billion/year) will be direct compliance expenditures by the industry such as additional equipment, labor and record-keeping costs.

The remaining 20% will come from increased prices that the industry will have to pay for construction materials and building products such as concrete block, glass, and roofing shingles. OSHA’s estimates failed to take into account these additional costs, CISC says. The added cost would be passed down to customers, the industry group says.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Jan 10, 2019

Ontario building first to achieve zero-carbon designation by Canada GBC

Geothermal heating, living wall among notable features.

Codes and Standards | Jan 9, 2019

Policymakers need to act to alleviate affordable housing crunch

Moody’s economist says costs including mortgage rates worsening situation.

Codes and Standards | Jan 7, 2019

Program uses low-cost sensors to monitor impact of stormwater mitigation systems

University/municipal partnership in Philadelphia aims to improve green infrastructure design.

Codes and Standards | Jan 7, 2019

Washington, D.C., to transition to 100% renewable energy by 2032

Includes measures to reduce emissions from buildings and transportation.

Codes and Standards | Jan 4, 2019

Canada’s National Building Code will include climate change obligations

New durability requirements for new buildings in the works.

Codes and Standards | Jan 4, 2019

LEED v4.1 beta registration begins in January

First releases are O+M, BD+C, and ID+C.

Codes and Standards | Jan 3, 2019

U.S. Appeals Court says general contractors can be cited for subcontractor violations

Ruling will prompt review of OSH decision that said GCs cannot be held liable for subs’ violations.

Codes and Standards | Jan 3, 2019

Tall mass timber code changes receive final approval

New provisions to be included in the 2021 International Building Code.

Codes and Standards | Jan 2, 2019

ASHRAE’s Low-Rise Residential Buildings standard update now available

Performance measures are at least 50% more efficient than 2006 IECC.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021