flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

Codes and Standards

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. 


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | April 22, 2015
OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The Construction Industry Safety Coalition will cost the industry $5 billion per year. Image: Morgue File/PenMac

A new report by the Construction Industry Safety Coalition (CISC) found that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) proposed silica standards for U.S. construction industry will cost the industry $5 billion per year. That’s about $4.5 billion per year more than OSHA’s estimate.

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. The proposed rule aims to greatly reduce the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of crystalline silica for the construction industry.

The agency pegged the cost to the construction industry at about $511 million a year. “The OSHA analysis included major errors and omissions that account for the large discrepancies with the CISC report,” according to a statement from the industry group.

The CISC report estimates that about 80% of the cost ($3.9 billion/year) will be direct compliance expenditures by the industry such as additional equipment, labor and record-keeping costs.

The remaining 20% will come from increased prices that the industry will have to pay for construction materials and building products such as concrete block, glass, and roofing shingles. OSHA’s estimates failed to take into account these additional costs, CISC says. The added cost would be passed down to customers, the industry group says.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Dec 28, 2020

CSI and ASTM standards can now be connected through a central location

CROSSWALK web service accesses standards specific to projects from feasibility to turnover.

Codes and Standards | Dec 28, 2020

Dept. of Energy offers Better Buildings Field Validation Results Hub

One-stop-shop for information associated with technology validations in buildings.

Codes and Standards | Dec 28, 2020

2021 Defense Authorization Act includes mass timber provision

Directs defense, agriculture secretaries to review potential for wood frame construction on defense building projects.

Codes and Standards | Dec 28, 2020

New York City proposal would require rainwater detention tanks for new development

Rule would apply to projects on lots sized 20,000 sf or larger.

Codes and Standards | Dec 17, 2020

Energy efficiency as a service gaining ground as financing approach for adopting innovations

Building owners can invest in new technology with no upfront cost.

Codes and Standards | Dec 16, 2020

Resources available to address Legionella threat

Buildings reopened after extended pandemic closure are at risk.

Codes and Standards | Dec 16, 2020

New Specifications for Concrete Construction reference manual released

Scope expanded to include shotcrete, internal curing, mineral fillers, and recycled concrete aggregates.

Codes and Standards | Dec 15, 2020

Despite COVID-19 population flight, don’t write off big cities yet

Lure of urban life and jobs may draw people back after pandemic subsides.

Codes and Standards | Dec 10, 2020

Test method for vertical fenestration installation procedures updated

FGIA issues first update for document created in 2005.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021