flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Real estate investors lose over $2.6B annually in roof system value

Real estate investors lose over $2.6B annually in roof system value

CRS Roof Consultants analysis reveals US Property Investors will be Losing from $2B to $5B annually by 2014 in roof system asset values.


March 8, 2011

SAN JOSE, CA (March 8, 2011) - CRS Roof Consultants, the leading Independent Roof Consulting Firm and authority on Commercial Roof System Investments reports industry losses on the consumption side of the equation. Buyers will be loosing between $2.6B and $5.6B annually, in roof system value by the year 2014.

According to a Freedonia Group, the US Roofing Industry is expected to expand by 2.4% through 2014 reaching nearly $18B in value. Additional reports suggest material cost will rise by 4.5% over the same time period.

Industry Life-Cycle Reports indicate roof systems worldwide fail on average in about 17 years. CRS Roof Consultants who tracts regional life-cycles says dryer states like California experience much shorter life-cycle averages, closer to 14 years for commercial roof systems.

Combined, the numbers represent a 15% to 32% in loss value on the purchase of 20/25 year assets respectively. "Total losses depend on buyer perceptions as to the expected Life-Cycle", said Kevin Cardoza, a Senior Analyst at CRS Roof Consultants. Most consumers (residential and commercial) expect to get closer to 25 years out of a 20 year roof system. Industry reports on premature failures as low as 12 years with an average of 17 years indicate a huge loss in value for buyers.

The installation of Roof Systems entail various components that are assembled to manufacture a complete roof system on-site at building locations. The only available controls close to an equivalent ISO9000 are certifications required by some material manufacturers, which only apply to contractors who offer the manufacturers' extended warranties.

Inefficiencies and generally accepted roof practices at the point of installation account largely for early water intrusion issues, said Dale Rowe (RRO), an Independent Registered Roof Observer and Inspector. Buyers leave the details up to contractors who write bid proposals where architects and general contractors reference warranty specifications but leave out critical roofing project details.

Statistically, roof systems installed in accordance with a set of defined performance rules under a complete roofing project specification outpace expectations and last from twenty to thirty years. Real Estate Investors, Management and Tenants whom adhere to roof system performance objectives tend to reduce long-term asset maintenance expense.

The ratio of Commercial Buildings and Annual Roofing Projects to the number of Independent Roof Consulting Firms suggest only a fraction of all Roof System Investments are based on Bid Specifications that define and hold contractors accountable for installation/labor warranty performance.

A well written Roofing Project Bid Specification can run $10K-$12K and save $60K-$80K on a Commercial Building but many private investors and smaller real estate investment firms view it as unnecessary expense. So, it's not unusual to see a barrage of abandoned rooftop assets from a history of rotating tenants and out of control roofing expense.

Only a few tenants (ie: Home Depot, Safeway, Best Buy, etc.) who's entire building is dedicated to product storage for immediate delivery implement Rooftop Asset Management Programs. Short term office and R&D building occupants seldom return rooftop assets (including that space below roof substrates) to their original condition as required by triple net leases.

Tight credit markets and reduced flipping have real estate investors moving more towards a value based approach to roofing. "We've seen increased demand for both Written Roofing Project Specifications and Project Management in the commercial markets but Home Owner Associations remain resistant to higher cost on those projects" said Construction Performance Builders, Inc. President, Terrence Osuga.

About CRS Roof Consultants

CRS Roof Consultants, the nations leading Independent Roof Consulting Firm. Established in 1986, its headquarters remain in the heart of Silicon Valley (San Jose, California) where it services national clients. As an authority on Commercial Roof System Investments, CRS Roof Consultants publishes information and technical papers that outline and educate readers on best roofing practices for property owners, investors, asset managers and property managers in the commercial real estate industry.

For more information about CRS Roof Consultants, the Roof Inspection White Paper or to obtain a free copy, visit: http://www.CRSRoofConsultants.comhttp://www.CRSRoofConsultants.com

Related Stories

| May 30, 2014

MIT researchers create 'home in a box' transformable wall system for micro apartments

Dubbed CityHome, the system integrates furniture, storage, exercise equipment, lighting, office equipment, and entertainment systems into a compact wall unit. 

| May 30, 2014

Riding high: L.A., Chicago working on their version of the High Line elevated park

Cities around the U.S. are taking notice of New York's highly popular High Line elevated park system. Both Chicago and Los Angeles are currently working on High Line-like projects.

| May 30, 2014

Developer will convert Dallas' storied LTV Building into mixed-use residential tower

New Orleans-based HRI Properties recently completed the purchase of one of the most storied buildings in downtown Dallas. The developer will convert the LTV Building into a mixed-use complex, with 171 hotel rooms and 186 luxury apartments.

| May 29, 2014

Turn your pen-and-paper sketches into digital drawings in seconds with this nifty gadget [video]

Funded through Kickstarter, iSketchnote uses a smart pen to instantly digitize hand-written notes and drawings.

| May 29, 2014

7 cost-effective ways to make U.S. infrastructure more resilient

Moving critical elements to higher ground and designing for longer lifespans are just some of the ways cities and governments can make infrastructure more resilient to natural disasters and climate change, writes Richard Cavallaro, President of Skanska USA Civil.

| May 29, 2014

Wood advocacy groups release 'lessons learned' report on tall wood buildings

The wood-industry advocacy group reThink Wood has released "Summary Report: Survey of International Tall Wood Buildings," with informatino from 10 mid-rise projects in Europe, Australia, and Canada. 

| May 29, 2014

Five finalists, including SOM and Zaha Hadid, chosen in competition for Sweden's tallest skyscraper

In Sernecke's competition to design Sweden's tallest skyscraper, five finalists have been selected: Manuelle Gautrand Architects, Ian Simpson Architects, SOM, Wingårdhs Arkitektkontor, and Zaha Hadid Architects.

| May 29, 2014

Retail renovation trends: Omni-channel shopping, personalized experiences among top goals of new store designs

In pursuit of enhanced customer experiences, retailers are using Big Data, interactive technology, and omni-channel shopping to transform their bricks and mortar locations.

| May 28, 2014

Video Blog: How today’s construction firms are bridging the BIM gap

Turner Construction and Parsons Brinckerhoff talk about how BIM has revolutionized the way that they conduct projects, and how technology has allowed them to leverage collaboration in such a way that they can work with decentralized teams.

| May 28, 2014

KPF's dual towers in Turkey will incorporate motifs, symbols of Ottoman Empire

The two-building headquarters for Turkey’s largest and oldest financial institution, Ziraat Bank, is inspired by the country’s cultural heritage. 

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Urban Planning

Bridging the gap: How early architect involvement can revolutionize a city’s capital improvement plans

Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs) typically span three to five years and outline future city projects and their costs. While they set the stage, the design and construction of these projects often extend beyond the CIP window, leading to a disconnect between the initial budget and evolving project scope. This can result in financial shortfalls, forcing cities to cut back on critical project features.




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021