flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Reconstruction Sector Engineering Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]

Reconstruction Sector Engineering Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]

URS, STV, Wiss Janney Elstner top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest reconstruction engineering and engineering/architecture firms in the U.S.


By BD+C Staff | July 19, 2013
Rank Company 2012 Reconstruction Revenue ($)
1 URS Corp. $292,591,405
2 STV $125,755,000
3 Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates $72,500,000
4 Science Applications International Corp. $57,788,875
5 Middough $54,100,000
6 Dewberry $53,086,519
7 SSOE Group $52,518,417
8 Thornton Tomasetti $50,250,524
9 Syska Hennessy Group $49,258,501
10 AKF Group $45,000,000
11 Simpson Gumpertz & Heger $43,800,000
12 Buro Happold Consulting Engineers $38,844,000
13 Henderson Engineers $33,000,000
14 TTG $30,728,610
15 Environmental Systems Design $28,211,025
16 RDK Engineers $26,520,850
17 Smith Seckman Reid $21,167,725
18 H&A Architects & Engineers $20,982,548
19 Rolf Jensen & Associates $20,800,000
20 TLC Engineering for Architecture $20,577,575
21 RMF Engineering Design $18,698,000
22 Degenkolb Engineers $18,338,904
23 Ross & Baruzzini $17,765,787
24 Interface Engineering $16,895,439
25 Michael Baker Jr. $16,480,000
26 Bard, Rao + Athanas Consulting Engineers $15,500,000
27 Newcomb & Boyd $14,428,325
28 Coffman Engineers $14,200,000
29 KCI Technologies $13,432,000
30 ThermalTech Engineering $12,900,000
31 Affiliated Engineers $12,660,000
32 Glumac $12,633,000
33 Dunham Associates $12,500,000
34 Clark Nexsen $12,454,770
35 KPFF Consulting Engineers $11,000,000
36 Walker Parking Consultants $10,939,513
37 H.F. Lenz $10,796,600
38 Bergmann Associates $10,159,200
39 CCRD Partners $10,100,000
40 Allen & Shariff $10,000,000
41 Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers $9,277,886
42 Merrick & Co. $9,000,000
43 Heapy Engineering $8,846,776
44 Sparling $8,518,471
45 Hixson Architecture, Engineering, Interiors $8,500,000
46 M-E Engineers $8,000,000
47 M/E Engineering $7,940,450
48 KLH Engineers $7,036,415
49 Peter Basso Associates $6,609,600
50 Bala Consulting Engineers $6,572,000
51 CTLGroup $5,500,000
52 Paulus, Sokolowski and Sartor $5,200,000
53 P2S Engineering $4,717,436
54 GRAEF $4,620,000
55 Rist-Frost-Shumway Engineering $4,300,000
56 Brinjac Engineering $4,018,072
57 Davis, Bowen & Friedel $3,616,428
58 Wallace Engineering $3,500,000
59 Kamm Consulting $3,313,597
60 OLA Consulting Engineers $3,200,000
61 Primera Engineers $2,990,000
62 Magnusson Klemencic Associates $2,719,958
63 FBA Engineering $2,160,000
64 Haynes Whaley Associates $639,876
65 Walter P Moore $320,431

 

Back to the Reconstruction Giants article

 

Read BD+C's full Giants 300 Report

Related Stories

| Apr 12, 2011

American Institute of Architects announces Guide for Sustainable Projects

AIA Guide for Sustainable Projects to provide design and construction industries with roadmap for working on sustainable projects.

| Apr 11, 2011

Wind turbines to generate power for new UNT football stadium

The University of North Texas has received a $2 million grant from the State Energy Conservation Office to install three wind turbines that will feed the electrical grid and provide power to UNT’s new football stadium. 

| Apr 8, 2011

SHW Group appoints Marjorie K. Simmons as CEO

Chairman of the Board Marjorie K. Simmons assumes CEO position, making SHW Group the only firm in the AIA Large Firm Roundtable to appoint a woman to this leadership position

| Apr 5, 2011

Zaha Hadid’s civic center design divides California city

Architect Zaha Hadid  is in high demand these days, designing projects in Hong Kong, Milan, and Seoul, not to mention the London Aquatics Center, the swimming arena for the 2012 Olympics. But one of the firm’s smaller clients, the city of Elk Grove, Calif., recently conjured far different kinds of aquatic life when members of the City Council and the public chose words like “squid,” “octopus,” and “starfish” to describe the latest renderings for a proposed civic center.

| Apr 5, 2011

Are architects falling behind on BIM?

A study by the National Building Specification arm of RIBA Enterprises showed that 43% of architects and others in the industry had still not heard of BIM, let alone started using it. It also found that of the 13% of respondents who were using BIM only a third thought they would be using it for most of their projects in a year’s time.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Urban Planning

Bridging the gap: How early architect involvement can revolutionize a city’s capital improvement plans

Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs) typically span three to five years and outline future city projects and their costs. While they set the stage, the design and construction of these projects often extend beyond the CIP window, leading to a disconnect between the initial budget and evolving project scope. This can result in financial shortfalls, forcing cities to cut back on critical project features.



Libraries

Reasons to reinvent the Midcentury academic library

DLR Group's Interior Design Leader Gretchen Holy, Assoc. IIDA, shares the idea that a designer's responsibility to embrace a library’s history, respect its past, and create an environment that will serve student populations for the next 100 years.

halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021