flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Seattle's Bullitt Center influencing codes and public policy on sustainability

Seattle's Bullitt Center influencing codes and public policy on sustainability

Seeking approval to be its own water district


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | October 24, 2014
The buildings design was made possible by Seattles Deep Green Pilot Program th
The buildings design was made possible by Seattles Deep Green Pilot Program that allows builders to deviate from standard code

The Bullitt Center in Seattle, which some say is the world's "most efficient" office building is not only influencing how other structures are built, it is contributing to revisions of codes and public policy.

The building’s design was made possible by Seattle’s Deep Green Pilot Program that allows builders to deviate from standard codes to build more sustainably. For example, the building was allowed to add two to three feet to the height of each floor to allow more daylighting. Neighbors objected to the additional 10 feet in overall building height, but the program permitted the non-conforming design.

Some of the building’s code deviations have been incorporated into the city code. For instance, the city council and the mayor had to approve changes to the building code to allow permits for “sustainability features.” This move allows the building’s solar canopy to extend all the way to the property line.

Bullitt Foundation, the environmental group that owns the building, recently signed a first-in-the-nation agreement with the local utility that will allow the foundation to sell Seattle City Light the energy it is saving or “negawatts.” The arrangement, known as MEETS (metered energy efficiency transaction structure) could be a pioneer in drawing investment funds to energy-efficiency projects.

Bullitt is also seeking final approvals from the county and state to turn the building into its own water district. That designation would allow tenants to drink rainwater collected on site and treated in the building’s basement.

(http://grist.org/business-technology/how-one-building-is-changing-the-world/)

Related Stories

| Jun 21, 2012

Brazilian engineering/construction firm Odebrecht sues Florida over ban on companies doing business in Cuba

Odebrecht Construction Inc., a Brazilian engineering and construction company, is suing the State of Florida over a new law that bans governments from hiring companies with business ties to Cuba.

| Jun 21, 2012

String of shattered glass balcony panels prompts call for code reform in Ontario

Since last summer, glass balconies have shattered at 13 different buildings in Toronto.

| Jun 21, 2012

California adds window film to building code

California is the first state to add window film into its building code. Window film, a polymer material, offers cost-effective energy savings.

| Jun 21, 2012

New ISO standard to improve environmental management of concrete

A new ISO standard will help the construction industry better manage the environmental impacts of concrete.

| Jun 21, 2012

On net-zero projects, Building Teams will be held accountable for energy-efficiency performance

The building team will be held accountable for how net-zero energy buildings perform two, five, and maybe ten years after completion.

| Jun 14, 2012

USGBC co-founder launches rating system for building product manufacturers

U.S. Green Building Council co-founder David Gottfried’s new venture, Regenerative Ventures, has established a rating system for building product manufacturers.

| Jun 14, 2012

Green standard set for single-ply roofing membrane

A sustainability standard has been established for single-ply roofing membranes used on commercial buildings.

| Jun 14, 2012

Minnesota Vikings stadium plan gets legislative go-ahead

Legislation that approved the construction of a new billion dollar stadium for the Minnesota Vikings passed the Minnesota legislature.

| Jun 14, 2012

Report alleges New York’s prevailing construction wages are miscalculated, costing billions

A miscalculation in how prevailing wages are calculated in New York reportedly costs the state $3 billion a year in public-infrastructure projects.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021