flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

State of the state: How state governments are funding construction projects

Justice Facilities

State of the state: How state governments are funding construction projects

State budget shortfalls are making new construction and renovation projects a tough sell, leading lawmakers to seek alternative funding for these jobs.  


By John Caulfield, Senior Editor | March 5, 2015
State of the state: How state governments are funding construction projects

Bonds issued to build or renovate 44 courthouses in California helped pay for the $29.4 million Superior Court for San Benito County, which opened in 2014. The exterior is distinguished by a cantilevered patterned canopy. Photo: Bruce Damonte, courtesy SmithGroupJJR

This article first appeared in the March 2015 issue of BD+C.

It took six years, but in 2013, the Utah State Courts finally got the state legislature to approve a budget for the $34.2 million 2nd District Juvenile Courthouse, in Ogden. When it opens this May, the 85,000-sf, five-story building will include eight courtrooms, offices for judges and their 50-member staff, and space for juvenile probation services and the Weber County Sheriff’s security staff.

Projects like the Utah courthouse are luxuries for many states that, despite improving economies, are struggling to keep their heads above water.

Since the second half of 2013, state tax collections have fluctuated. They were down in the first half of 2014, then rebounded by 4.4% in the third quarter of 2014 over the same period a year earlier, according to the Rockefeller Institute of Government. The institute expects continued revenue growth in the coming quarters, but state tax collections have failed to keep pace with expenditures, especially as more states expand Medicaid coverage under the Affordable Care Act.

At least 16 states are facing serious budget shortfalls, according to the Washington Post. These include Louisiana, which is looking at a $1.6 billion deficit, which ballooned by $400 million as the price of oil—a huge source of state revenue—fell by 50%. Other states with impending deficits include Virginia ($2.4 billion), Pennsylvania ($1.8 billion), Kansas ($1 billion through FY 2016), Alabama ($950 million), and Maryland ($900 million).

The National Association of State Budget Officers (NASBO) notes that all states but Vermont either require their governors to submit or sign a balanced budget, or their legislatures to pass a balance budget. With tax increases mostly off the table, achieving balance means spending cuts. Recent data offer inconclusive clues as to the impact of those cuts on future state-funded construction and renovation work.

One snapshot—NASBO’s “State Expenditure Report 2012-2014”—projected a 5.5% increase, to $17.4 billion, in the states’ capital expenditures in fiscal 2014 for projects in an “all other” category that includes stadiums, public schools, and healthcare.

The Census Bureau’s broader estimates for public state and local construction put in place were less robust. Last year that number stood at $251.5 billion, up 2.2% from 2013, but still the second-lowest spending year since 2006. 

Big-ticket categories were Roads and Bridges, Education, Transportation, and Sewage and Waste Disposal. Amusements and Recreation (which include sports stadiums) jumped 7.7% to $8.7 billion. Office construction was up 3.6% to $5.4 billion; Public Safety projects (jails, firehouses, etc.) fell by 7.9%, to $6.1 billion. Healthcare declined by 10.5%, to $6.3 billion.

Jan Frew, Deputy Administrator for Idaho’s Public Works division, reached out to several of her counterparts in the National Association of State Facilities Administrators on behalf of BD+C. Most of those contacted reported slight increases in tax revenues but only modest state-funded construction activities, she says.

Frew says that, since 2011, Idaho’s appropriations for public works have been “fairly steady,” at around $22.5 million per year. But while appropriations have recently spiked to $36 million, lawmakers aren’t confident that tax revenues will keep growing and are being cautious about adding to the state’s project funding base. Frew says the state is also reluctant to use bonds to fund projects.

Other states are looking for new ways to lower their construction costs. Illinois, Indiana, South Carolina, and West Virginia are among the states debating whether to repeal prevailing wage laws that apply to government-funded projects.

Newly elected Hawaii Governor David Ige, a Democrat, proclaimed that his state would actively seek more federal dollars to help fund state projects for housing, water, and transportation.

On the other hand, a can-do spirit is evident in Maine, where Governor Paul LePage, a Republican, recently unveiled a three-year, $2 billion, 1,900-project public works plan that, in 2015 alone, would include safety improvement projects at 76 locations, and $4 million for improvements at Portland’s International Marine Terminal.

In Michigan, the first stages of a new $88 million Welcome Center and park for the State Capitol have been initiated, even though the project’s funding mechanism isn’t in place. John Truscott, a spokesman for the Michigan State Capitol Commission, says the early work is being paid for through a $3 million allocation established last year for Capitol renovation and upkeep. The commission is seeking bond financing for the Welcome Center that would be repaid with tobacco taxes.

Related Stories

| Jul 18, 2013

Top Local Government Sector Construction Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]

Turner, Clark Group, PCL top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest local government sector contractor and construction management firms in the U.S.

| Jul 18, 2013

Top Local Government Sector Engineering Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]

STV, URS, AECOM top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest local government sector engineering and engineering/architecture firms in the U.S. 

| Jul 18, 2013

Top Local Government Sector Architecture Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]

Stantec, HOK, IBI Group top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest local government sector architecture and architecture/engineering firms in the U.S. 

| Jul 18, 2013

Top State Government Sector Construction Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]

PCL, Clark Group, Turner top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest state government sector contractor and construction management firms in the U.S.

| Jul 18, 2013

Top State Government Sector Engineering Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]

Jacobs, AECOM, URS top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest state government sector engineering and engineering/architecture firms in the U.S. 

| Jul 18, 2013

Top State Government Sector Architecture Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]

Stantec, Perkins+Will, HNTB top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest state government sector architecture and architecture/engineering firms in the U.S. 

| Jul 18, 2013

Top Federal Government Sector Construction Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]

Clark Group, PCL, Hensel Phelps top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest federal government sector contractor and construction management firms in the U.S.

| Jul 18, 2013

Top Federal Government Sector Engineering Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]

Fluor, URS, AECOM top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest federal government sector engineering and engineering/architecture firms in the U.S.

| Jul 18, 2013

Top Government Sector Construction Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]

Clark Group, Turner, PCL head Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest government sector contractors and construction management firms in the U.S.

| Jul 18, 2013

Top Government Sector Engineering Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]

Fluor, URS, AECOM top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest government sector engineering and engineering/architecture firms in the U.S.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Giants 400

Top 50 Justice Facility Construction Firms for 2023

Turner Construction, Whiting-Turner, STO Building Group, Clark Group, and CORE Construction top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest justice facility general contractors and construction management (CM) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report. Note: This ranking includes revenue from all public safety/justice facilities buildings work, including correctional facilities, fire stations, jails, police stations, and prisons.  


Giants 400

Top 60 Justice Facility Engineering Firms for 2023

EXP, AECOM, IMEG, Dewberry, and Tetra Tech head BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest justice facility engineering and engineering architecture (EA) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report. Note: This ranking includes revenue from all public safety/justice facilities buildings work, including correctional facilities, fire stations, jails, police stations, and prisons.  


Giants 400

Top 90 Justice Facility Architecture Firms for 2023

DLR Group, Stantec, HDR, HOK, and Elevatus Architecture top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest justice facility architecture and architecture engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report. Note: This ranking includes revenue from all public safety/justice facilities buildings work, including correctional facilities, fire stations, jails, police stations, and prisons. 


Giants 400

Top 115 Architecture Engineering Firms for 2023

Stantec, HDR, Page, HOK, and Arcadis North America top the rankings of the nation's largest architecture engineering (AE) firms for nonresidential building and multifamily housing work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021